to play football, not to play trumpet
- Member for
- 4 years 16 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|2 days 2 hours ago||Download||
When will this Michigan roster download be available? I just downloaded from BallHawgMichigan on my PS3 and I am getting the team from 2015 Fall with NO RASHAN GARY. I must start playing a dynasty with Rashan ASAP.
When can I expect updated 2016 Rosters, at least for Michigan?? I care less about other teams.
|4 days 5 hours ago||Theo Howard||
The video was the top 5 plays for Theo Howard, please fix.
|1 week 4 days ago||Bryan Mone||
Denard the same as Bryan Mone, makes sense right? NOPE.
|3 weeks 3 days ago||Soccer is killing us||
No points at all from either Men's or Women's soccer. Disgraceful. We use the max # of scholarships and pay for top coaches, right? Then what gives? Why aren't we better at soccer?
Glad to see Cross Country contributing so much, those are strong programs right now.
|3 weeks 4 days ago||The Dual||
Were you there when Denard won the 60m dash at the UM-OSU Dual Meet?
I was! It was his freshman year and he had played some in Football and many people knew him. I saw him outside warming up and said hi and go blue. He smiled. That was close as I ever got to Denard!
|3 weeks 4 days ago||110H||
13.73 is an excellent time in the 110H. From a quck glance at the Big Ten 2015 results, it is good enough to make final and score points in that meet.
Impressive, especially since this was Drake's time from 4 years ago. I knew he was a hurdler but didn't realize the potential.
|3 weeks 5 days ago||But if anything, this is a||
But if anything, this is a good sign right? Hoke was 11-2 in 2011 but remember how many fubles we recovered? My memory says it was ALL of the fumbles.
It means that we were actually good this past season, and not lucky. Move to the mean next season with the same dominant defense and we will be even better.
|4 weeks 2 days ago||Plans||
I will not watch on NYE unless Michigan is playing.
|4 weeks 4 days ago||Feedback||
I don't quite see why you need to have 4 divisions when in essence your proposal is really just 2 divisions. I would say instead to keep it simple:
- 2 divisions of 8
- Play 6 division games instead of 7, so that you DON'T play every team from the division each year. You miss one team each year but there are protected rivals so that we never miss OSU (I'm fine with missing MSU once per 6 years).
- Play 3 crossover games to ensure that you see other division teams at least every 3 years.
I think this is virtually identical to your proposal. In either mine or yours, you have the potential for 2 undefeated teams from the same division (or paired divisions in your case) to not play each other and one must miss the B1G championship. But it would happen super rarely.
|4 weeks 5 days ago||Not so fast||
I believe that David and Sypniewski are scholarship guys from the beggining of their careers at UM. Their scholarships cannot be pulled....
So we do need more attrition, which is hard to peg at this point. You really never know, remember the situations from last year with Countess or Jack Miller. Who would have predicted these guys departing?
|6 weeks 3 days ago||I'm sure Harbaugh knew that||
I'm sure Harbaugh knew that Durkin was ambitious and I agree with others that this is a GOOD thing for the program to be seen as a stepping stone to bigger jobs.
However, I do think Harbaugh probably got blindsided by his decision to interview the week before the OSU game, which was unprofessional in my opinion. He should have told Maryland to wait a few days if they were interested in him.
So, I would be 100% supportive of DJ and his decision to leave if it weren't for the timing and the performance against OSU where the defense was noticably worse (particularly around scheme/coaching) than in any other game of the season. As a result of this I am only 75% supportive of DJ in the new gig.
|6 weeks 5 days ago||Fair Enough||
Fair enough, I see your point. Better to force some downfield throws which have a relatively low chance of connecting than getting gauged up the middle in the run game or leaving open easy throws underneath. Maybe DJ should have considered this strategy against OSU instead of spending his week interviewing for the next coaching gig.
|6 weeks 5 days ago||Two wide open downfield||
Two wide open downfield players and missed throws....is this really a sign of a good defense or a lucky defense?
|7 weeks 3 days ago||Wormley||
I wonder if their TEs will be able to block Chris Wormley? Nope.
|7 weeks 5 days ago||Stern||
Agree with others here, the interviews themselves are great but the wack pack stuff is so stupid and tedius. My carpool loves Howard and it's a great relief to me when there is an actual interview instead of the other stupid stuff he does.
|8 weeks 5 days ago||Joke||
I'm surprised that Brian doesn't know a basic statistics joke, he has a CS degree, correct? Shouldn't a bachelor's degree in CS at least include AP level statistics?
|8 weeks 5 days ago||Eh, Disagree||
People proposing 6 or 8 teams are missing the point. You want the regular season to matter a lot. As soon as you go that many teams in playoff, then teams at the top (ranks 1-3) can afford a loss and still make the playoff. Thefore many high profile regular season games no longer matter. MSU - Iowa doesn't matter. Both get in anyways. Same with OSU-MSU. Clemson could have lost to UNC, doesn't matter. They'd be in at 12-1. Alabama could have lost to Florida and still been in.
You get the idea. But I am biased, I don't watch neutral site College FB games (too sterile, the atmosphere kills it for me) so I prefer the real regular season games to matter as much as possible.
|8 weeks 5 days ago||uniforms||
Should be replaced by *uniformz
|8 weeks 6 days ago||J Lew||
Or Jourdan Lewis
|9 weeks 2 days ago||^^^^^^^^^^^^||
I agree with this. It would be crushing if both of MSU and OSU made the playoff. Therefore I will root for anything that will make it tougher for OSU/MSU to get in.
Iowa over MSU
Stanford over USC
Clemson/Alabama to win
In terms of the playoff itself, I will likely just root for good close game with crazy finishes.
|9 weeks 4 days ago||Well||
But as the article states, in 99% of cases they will take the highest ranked team based on the playoff rankings. The exception being teams that have gone many times in a row, i.e. Wisconsin. Therefore, it will all come down to who the committee ranks higher. Presumable a 1 loss Ohio State would jump a 2 loss Michigan State and go to the Rose. If it's Iowa that loses, maybe Iowa would stay ahead though the committee could again jump OSU ahead of them. My guess is OSU ends up playing.
|9 weeks 4 days ago||Ding Ding Ding!||
The OP clearly didn't read the article. The point is that the Rose Bowl is free to take OSU instead of the loser of the B1G Championship game. This is how this stuff works, losing in conference championships hurts teams. The same thing happened in our favor back in 2011; We missed the conference champs but MSU lost that game and the Sugar Bowl picked us over them even when they beat us head to head.
|9 weeks 4 days ago||Agree||
I also feel like OSU has a much better chance of actually winning the playoff whereas I see MSU as an underdog in the semifinal and the final regardless of matchups. Because I don't want either rival to win the title I'd rather see MSU make the playoff than OSU.
Also, we can hope that Iowa wins in Indy and neither rival makes the playoff. This is ideal.
|9 weeks 4 days ago||yes!||
Let us never forget the immense contributions of Jim Hackett! I loved his Michigan man comments.
|9 weeks 5 days ago||Magnusson got a 3rd team from||
Magnusson got a 3rd team from both coaches and media. Lots of guys got honorable mention, Deveon Smith, G. Glasgow, Cole, Braden, Kalis, Darboh. Apparently the whole O line got some award.
|9 weeks 5 days ago||Basketball||
I am part of the down syndrome community and was happy to see the tweet of our coach playing one on one with this fine young gentleman who appears to have DS. Part of me was hoping the media would interview the kid and find out his story for a fluff piece on his experience with JH. But JH did it just because he was there and it was natural, probably better than some staged media thing.
|9 weeks 5 days ago||Seniors||
Seeing all of the seniors on here is exciting for next season but worrisome for 2017. We will have a lot of experience particularly at WR, OL, DL, and secondary. The concerns are of course LB, FB and QB. Still, seems like we should be great next season, wish we didn't have OSU, MSU and Iowa all on the road.
|9 weeks 6 days ago||^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^||
Nice insights, I agree. Wilson did get one honorable mention. But Willie Henry and the lack of Glasgow is appaling.
|9 weeks 6 days ago||Wormley got a single third||
Wormley got a single third team. Glasgow got nothing. Bolden got honorable mentions. Clearly the voters don't read PFF or UFR.
|9 weeks 6 days ago||Peppers||
Would Peppers be first team All-Big Ten if not for his role on offense or special teams? My guess is no, because its about name recognition and he gets his name out there with his other roles. To be honest I would not have him slotted as first team, but definitely 2nd or honorable mention (caveat: I only watch UM so I have no idea about other teams). Glasgow/Wormley deserved 2nd team, did they miss that?