Forbes must not like Michigan football
December 17th, 2014 at 11:58 PM ^
Still more work in college. Acquiring players is just a much more time consuming task in CFB than it is in the NFL.
December 17th, 2014 at 11:51 PM ^
ESPN did an article proving how easy it is to coach in the NFL, focusing on Jim's brother:
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/10012376/baltimore-ravens-head-coach-…
December 17th, 2014 at 10:51 PM ^
clue that this guy is a moron:
Webster University
December 17th, 2014 at 10:56 PM ^
December 17th, 2014 at 11:05 PM ^
When is the Wall Street Journal doing a story on this?
December 17th, 2014 at 11:05 PM ^
December 18th, 2014 at 1:03 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 18th, 2014 at 1:21 AM ^
December 17th, 2014 at 11:07 PM ^
... is a mere shadow of what it used to be as a publication.
December 17th, 2014 at 11:08 PM ^
That's a really lame, superficial, poorly thought out and poorly written "article". Pretty much a waste of space and whatever he was paid to write it.
December 17th, 2014 at 11:10 PM ^
they don't really "recruit" in college. It's an opinion piece and that's fine, it leans toward the NFL and that's fine as well.
What is leaves out is validity related to a coach that may enjoy the challenge of rebuilding his alma mater and a roster that turns over 15-20% every year and prima donna millionaires are not there to tune out your message as coach.
Simply myopic
December 17th, 2014 at 11:15 PM ^
I am just glad this guy is NOT a professor in Michigan
December 18th, 2014 at 1:16 AM ^
Any true economic analysis would have to consider that NFL coaches have a longer season. Essentially, you work more.
December 18th, 2014 at 1:27 AM ^
December 18th, 2014 at 3:47 AM ^
unless we're now counting UNC-Charlotte and Binghamton as rivals, no. This information is spectacularly easy to find, btw
December 18th, 2014 at 7:12 AM ^
He lists "The Ohio State University Athletics Dept" as one of his clients on his SportsImpacts website.
December 18th, 2014 at 8:14 AM ^
Looks like I could write for Forbes:
$8M is a lot of money. College football coaches must recruit players while NFL coaches have GM's to manage the very simple salary cap issues. In conclusion, football is a land of contrasts.
December 18th, 2014 at 9:40 AM ^
I think he's all about the page clicks. He wrote an article why Adrian Peterson's switch incident was worse for the NFL's image than Ray Rice's fist.
I don't know if I can take anything he says seriously after that.
December 18th, 2014 at 10:08 AM ^
December 18th, 2014 at 10:15 AM ^
I used to work for an advertising company that had a CMO with a connection with Forbes. They will literally post anything you give them if it can be stretched out to 500+ words and get them links. I'm sure there are good reporters working there, but I'm not surprised stuff likes this gets published online.
December 18th, 2014 at 10:38 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 18th, 2014 at 11:22 AM ^
If an Economics professor at the University of Michigan posted some nonsensical gibberish like this online, I doubt he'd be on staff for very long afterwards.
I've taken but very basic Economic classes (read: intro) and I could have written a better article than this thrown-together shamble of highly opinionated non sequiturs. Embarassing to the Economic community, really.
December 18th, 2014 at 12:29 PM ^
According to reports Wednesday from the NFL Network and Yahoo Sports, the University of Michigan are offering Jim Harbaugh . . .NFL Network -- is that the first he heard about this? Ignorant slut. "University of Michigan are" -- is he a Brit? I could see reading this subject/verb formation in the Telegraph, but Forbes? 'Murica.
December 21st, 2014 at 9:12 AM ^
Here's a better Forbes piece on the Harbaugh situation:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/johntamny/2014/12/21/extolling-jim-harbaugh…