Who do we want to win the B1G title game (BCS-wise)?

Correct. Communism still spreading!!  Barack Delaney must go!  Kidding :)  Fun thread full of insightful talk and I enjoy, but with all due respect I think it's quite irrelevant.  Even with another down-to-the-wire, hail-mary finish FINALLY bringing the greatest college football game of all time to a breath-taking end in the 83rd overtime..... Michigan still moves ahead of the loser, period.  Really, our only (BCS related) rooting interest lies in the prison cell, recently renamed the Southeastern Athletic Conference, where we simply need LSU to take care of business;  a confident situation.  Agreed??  

That being said, let revenge be a bitch!  Upon an intensely scrutinized study of the B1G finalists' tendencies, coupled with a surgical statistical analysis of both teams' seasons, I have concluded, quite assuredly, that the exact following events will unfold if my air tight figures and calculations are indeed correct:  

1. Wisconsin's OL steamrolls Gholston who is promptly replaced by a helmet-less, padless, mouth piece-less Izzo.  
2. This substitution will be coincidentally followed by a sudden rule change which states "Upon entry of an Izzo into the game, all 10 of his teammates MUST leave him on the field, helpless, scared and alone."  
3. My calculus goes on to predict that Izzo will either be effortlessly badger-rolled, or the more predictable outcome that he will just scream himself into an aneurism.  

If anyone can take my honest pick on the game seriously after that biased blather, my (monopoly) money is with Vegas.  If I remember right, Wisco gashed State pretty bad on the ground in October.  Although State went on quite the run through the meat of the game (31-3), I would argue that the roll was less of the imposing, dominating variety and more of the, bounce of the ball, timely stops, break of the game variety.  Perhaps an embellishment, but that's how I seem to remember the game.  I would be really surprised to learn that State won any one of the T.O.P, Yds Rushing or First Down categories in that game. Not to totally discredit their win, but I'm just sayin... and I think most football observers would agree, it's safe to say that WIsconsin passed the eyeball test as the better, more oiled team in that matchup.  

State is probably the most aggressive team in the B1G with their LBs, and Ball and Co. were still gashing them up the middle regularly.  State somehow survived that bleeding at home in October but if they want a chance at winning again, they're going to have to play with both safeties up, leaving them vulnerable to the deep ball.  The Cheese's OL could have a little more trouble seeling of the ends now that Gholston is out on bail, but even still...  Decided advantage to Badgers Ground Game vs State front 7-9.     

Factor in the revenge angle, all the big- game choking criticism that Wisc Seniors are giddy to buck, and just the sheer bad odds of beating a better/equal team twice, Wisconsin ROLLS as Biellema so tastefully goes for two in a blowout, WITH his starters, while maintaning the sheepish, DB smirk the whole way.  Having said all that, if they do somehow lose, they will be officially validated as Football's biggest cupcake-eating FRAUDS.

Forewarning: If State somehow prevails, and despair appears to reign, don't choke from the bitter taste of "Michigan State University: Innagural B1G Championship Game Winners."  Instead, just pull out the "First Big Ten Baskteball Tournament Champions" card and listen to all Sparties fall silent!!  :)))  I hope an attempt at a bit of mild humor went over okay for my innagural post.  It at least helped me break up an otherwise excruciating night of studying :((  Go Badgers, Go Bulldogs, and whatever you do, PLEASE take the over on the Michigan vs Houston number :)))  Good night!!!!