Video replay in Michigan Stadium
It's awful. The in-stadium video boards show few enough replays, and virtually no replays of disputed/disputable plays. There's almost no use of any slow motion replay.
All of these effects, once limited by Conference rules, have now been allowed. But Michigan Stadium video operators, always behind our rivals in East Lansing and Madison (having seen both for myself) and to some extent in Ohio Stadium, seem to have done nothing to utilize the new freedom granted by the Conference.
http://www.bigten.org/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/082813aaa.html
Time for Michigan Stadium to get with the 21st century for video replay.
August 31st, 2013 at 11:17 PM ^
The BTN coverage had very few replays as well. Very frustrating for the MGoFan who is trying to apply the knowledge he learned on this blog.
August 31st, 2013 at 11:42 PM ^
September 1st, 2013 at 12:48 AM ^
Did they replay a single penalty call?
There is one other limiting feature as far as I know; that the Stadium boards don't routinely use the boradcast tv feed; they are using their own video sourcing, which is probably fewer cameras with less-capable replay technology than what ABC/ESPN would utilize. It's generally a very poor, tight view of plays where you can't see much more than a ballcarrier.
I'm happy to give them time to upgrade to the latest Conference dictates on what can now be shown. But I'm also right about the fact that the status quo is not good and anyone who has been to games at Camp Randall and Spartan Stadium will have seen more extensive use of replays.
September 1st, 2013 at 1:22 AM ^
September 1st, 2013 at 8:01 AM ^
August 31st, 2013 at 11:48 PM ^
Is there anything you don't complain about?
September 1st, 2013 at 12:13 AM ^
he doesn't usually complain about people complaining about things :)
September 1st, 2013 at 1:29 AM ^
Unless they are complaining about a certain resident of Tuscon, AZ.
September 1st, 2013 at 2:28 AM ^
Do you ever make insightful posts?
September 1st, 2013 at 5:42 AM ^
Your wife every Thursday afternoon.
I kid, I kid...
But my impression was the same for the BTN broadcast - I was wishing for more replays numerous times throughout the game. Wanted to check player #'s and make judgements about our new players, etc.
September 1st, 2013 at 6:39 AM ^
September 1st, 2013 at 12:04 AM ^
Also, not sure, but I highly doubt there were any really crucial replays In a game decided by 50 points.
September 1st, 2013 at 12:23 AM ^
I am intrigued to see what their protocol is for controversial/challenged plays is. You can't really complain about that for the CMU game as there weren't any such plays, but hopefully they allow them.
September 1st, 2013 at 12:44 AM ^
September 1st, 2013 at 10:23 AM ^
figured out that if they want to continue to fill the stands, they may need to think about fan experience and what is keeping them at home. The addition of wifi, and better replays fixes a few of them. Students can stay connected. MGoBloggers can liveblog. We can see the replays you can watch on TV at home.
Now, if they'd just let in coolers and thermoses like the old days ...
Anyway, MAYBE re-investing some of this money back into the average fan experience is the right thing to do.
(They still need to fix scheduling ...)