throw it deep

April 14th, 2020 at 4:30 PM ^

What makes you think the one-and-done rule is going away?

 

The fact is very few one-and-dones could be immediate contributors in the NBA (Zion is the only recent one I can think of). Most of them will need a year or two to develop and adjust to the faster pace of play. I'd think the NBA would much prefer that those players get that development on somebody else's payroll.

Darker Blue

April 14th, 2020 at 4:50 PM ^

The NBA drafts on potential...

I thought everyone knew this.

If teams think a 17 year old kid can be decent in a few years they'll draft him every time.

It's been this way for years. The only difference is right now these kids have to go play school for a year.

WolvinLA2

April 14th, 2020 at 4:53 PM ^

Exactly.  The teams in the lottery are almost always more than a year away from playing for anything meaningful so they're willing to wait a couple years for that potential to come to fruition.  That said, of course they'd prefer somebody else pay for that first year of development and a year to weed out who of the one and dones can really play at a higher level.

lhglrkwg

April 14th, 2020 at 3:35 PM ^

Let's just give up on McDonald's AA types. Too difficult to get these guys for one year and we obviously aren't making the "strong ass offers" needed to secure these guys like other schools are

OwenGoBlue

April 14th, 2020 at 4:01 PM ^

I think you can still chase those guys selectively. Players like JC are still the talent that can take a team over the top and - almost more importantly - those players lead to future ’croot interest.   

You hedge risk by oversigning and keeping a heavy eye on (or tampering with) the transfer market. Juwan is still going to have a chance to go get more guys, particularly with nobody on their own campus right now  

Today sucks but everyone saw this as a possibility with Todd and who knows what actually happened with JC. Maybe he was trolling from the jump, maybe being quarantined with his brother changed his mind.

BarryBadrinath

April 14th, 2020 at 5:05 PM ^

Why is everyone jumping to the conclusion that is too difficult to recruit All Americans? Seems like a very small sample to draw such a drastic conclusion.  The fact that we were even in contention for top players with a Head Coach that has been involved in college basketball recruiting for less than a year is a good sign (and still signed a very solid class) in my opinion. 

Beilein 4 Life

April 14th, 2020 at 4:29 PM ^

Impossible. I was told this class would be mediocre if Todd didn’t sign.

As to what our team will look like next year, we will still have one of the better teams in the B10. With Johns, Livers, and Wagner, I think we compete for the B10 championship. If we lose Livers or Franz, we won’t be that good, but we are still middle of the pack.

k1400

April 14th, 2020 at 5:30 PM ^

I saw somewhere that there's basically no chance of retrieving DDJ from the transfer portal.  How about Castleton?  Any chance of reeling him back in?

oriental andrew

April 15th, 2020 at 10:45 AM ^

I always found it curious that you can't sort by Avg (or any other column, for that matter - the default is Points).

In any case, looking at Avg, msu is ever so slightly ahead of Michigan - 97.79 to 97.47. Essentially equivalent, but Michigan has that average with 3 vs. 2 players, so similar quality with a greater depth. 

Illinois would be third with 96.09 avg, then Minnesota (94.32), Indiana (93.36), and Purdue (93.22). 

Wisconsin is listed at #3 by points, but that's based on quantity (5 commits). Avg (90.67) would drop them below Rutgers (91.18) and osu (92.82), and in line with #12 Northwestern (90.15). 

Don't know that it means all that much in the grand scheme, but interesting to look at.