Shocking! ESPN tells us how irrelevant UM and Notre Dame are
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/11465494/notre-dame-mich…
Snipet:
All of which brings us back to Notre Dame Stadium on Saturday night. The Fighting Irish and the Wolverines conclude a stirring 35-year rivalry with a lot of fanfare and not much else. Tickets on the secondary market are more expensive than ever, an economics lesson in artificial shortage. If the Irish and Wolverines were playing next season, tickets wouldn't be so costly.
I'm like everyone else. I wish Notre Dame hadn't pulled the plug on the rivalry. There may come a time, in the distant future when this rivalry is resumed, when more than bragging rights are at stake. But the truth is, Notre Dame and Michigan are groping about for national relevance.
It has been 26 years since Notre Dame won a national championship, nearly a decade longer than the previous longest drought (1949-66). How long ago? In 1988, Irish coach Brian Kelly was an assistant coach at Grand Valley State. How long ago? Four days after the Irish completed the regular season at 11-0 by defeating No. 2 USC 27-10, Seahawks quarterback and Super Bowl XLVIII MVP Russell Wilson was born.
Notre Dame stayed nationally relevant into the mid-1990s under Lou Holtz. They came back to the top five as recently as two years ago. But they have yet to make it clear they will stay.
It has been 17 seasons since Michigan won a national championship and that's not even the jaw-dropper. It's been 10 years since Michigan won a Big Ten championship. In the 10 years before that, Michigan won four Big Ten titles. In the 10 years before that, Michigan won six. In the 10 years ... you get the point.
So we say that college football is an oligarchy, because we know that the last 40 national championships have been won by only 22 schools. But there are some different names among the powers that currently be. Yes, Oklahoma and Alabama are there. But so are Oregon and Stanford. So is Baylor. Florida State has just returned to the top after a decade in the wilderness.
Michigan and Notre Dame will play for the last time in many years on Saturday night. It's a blow to anyone who likes neighborhood rivalries. But the national news being made has more to do with the end of an era than it does the top 25.
In other news, ESPN thinks the SEC is the Bees Knees and no, they have no reason to be biased.
September 5th, 2014 at 1:01 PM ^
tough to argue his point here. he concedes the game is highly watched and anticipated. he recognizes the importance of the game for history purposes. however, his point is, it doesnt (and hasnt for a while) have the significance it used to in terms of the national championship scene. he is right. there is no arguing that. 10 years ago, we would have all said, it is a result of ND's fall off. Now, its a two way street. like it or not, his point is valid.
September 5th, 2014 at 1:07 PM ^
I've done a complete 180 on ESPN over the years. When I was a kid, I would make sure I watched Sportscenter every single night after school. Now, I can't stand watching ESPN or reading their website. They are just unbearable now. Their "hidden agendas" are so transparent now. I won't even click on the link in that article.
September 5th, 2014 at 1:09 PM ^
September 5th, 2014 at 1:46 PM ^
Instead of the ESPN College Football Game Day broadcasts, Saturday morning football on TV now means NBC Sports Network.
September 5th, 2014 at 2:17 PM ^
They lost, badly, but that doesn't sound irrelevent. When was the last time Ole Miss, Kentucky, Mississippi State, Georgia or any other school not from LA or Alabama has done that?
September 5th, 2014 at 2:18 PM ^
September 5th, 2014 at 2:21 PM ^
September 5th, 2014 at 3:37 PM ^
The truth is, the truth hurts. Michigan is relevant here, but they the second best team in the state (counting the Lions), and haven't been relevant on the national scale since 2006.
Currently, the program is reeling, and trying to right itself. Until then, Michigan is relevant only because of uniforms and a great fight song.
September 5th, 2014 at 6:03 PM ^
We get it ESPN. Michigan hasn't been good since 2006. Now preview the damn game and current players because I care about this year's matchup not 2009 or 2010.
September 5th, 2014 at 8:24 PM ^
September 5th, 2014 at 7:10 PM ^
September 5th, 2014 at 8:48 PM ^
It's a relevant game to me, a Michigan fan. I don't need it to be relevant for anyone else.
September 5th, 2014 at 9:49 PM ^
September 5th, 2014 at 10:14 PM ^
so apologies if this was said already (it probably has been), but...
what do you expect from the network that a vested monetary interest in seeing the SEC succeed?
ESPN is garbage. The only thing I watch is live sporting events and even then I have the TV muted half the time so I don't have to listen to people like Eduardo Perez.