Rich Rod, Casteel, and the Myth about Money
I realize that this board will never agree on what caused Rodriguez to fail here. However, in an effort to focus our pointless bickering on the right questions, it's time to put to bed a very persistent myth. May the following remove one source of contention from our angry but increasingly-united fanbase.
The myth:
"In 2008, Bill Martin gave Rich Rodriguez only 265,000 to hire a defensive coordinator. This amount was too low to bring Casteel or any other top defensive coordinator to Michigan, which is why the defense was so terrible. Rich Rod was set up to fail."
Ignoring the silly notion that Martin would agree to furnish a new million-dollar weightroom and pay 2.5 million of RR's buyout but simultaneously put a $265,000 cap on the DC salary, let's take a look at what other power conference teams around the country were paying their DCs in 2008.
Ohio State (Jim Heacock): 260,510
Oklahoma (Brent Venables): 210,000
USC (Nick Holt): 300,000
Oregon (Nick Aliotti): 225,000
Alabama (Kirby Smart): 360,000
LSU (Bradley Dale Peveto): 200,000
Florida (Charlie Strong): 300,000
Nebraska (Carl Pelini): 190,000
Auburn (Ted Roof): 370,000
Georgia (Willie Martinez): 220,000
Florida State (Mickey Andrews): 295,483
Washington (Ed Donatell): 334,000
Cal (Bob Gregory): 168,000
Tennessee (John Chavis): 340,000
Texas (Will Muschamp): 250,000
Va Tech (Bud Foster): 300,000
Clemson (Vic Koennig): 260,000
Average: $269,611
Even assuming Michigan refused a requested increase, which is not supported by any documented facts, the offer of 265,000 was competitive even among the nation's richest big-name programs. The fact that it produced the 109th-ranked defense in 2010 is ridiculous and a spectacular indictment of the hiring abilites of one man. His name isn't Bill Martin.
October 31st, 2014 at 1:08 AM ^
October 31st, 2014 at 1:41 AM ^
Given that you've used the wrong year, I'm sure much of my data will appear incorrect. My post was about salaries in 2008. You've cited salaries from 2010/2011.
October 31st, 2014 at 2:06 AM ^
My mistake on the year. I got fixated on the year called out at the bottom of the post.
I should probably put my work down and go to bed since my ability to read AND comprehend is shot for the night.
Maybe I'll dash off a couple of nasty emails to clients?
October 31st, 2014 at 2:55 AM ^
October 31st, 2014 at 1:48 AM ^
October 31st, 2014 at 8:35 AM ^
October 31st, 2014 at 8:47 AM ^
Why can't you morons just get over it and admit that RR was/is a great coach and that maybe just maybe the almight Michigan is at fault here?
RR was a great coach before he got here. RR is a great coach after he left here...
Maybe it was the masses of morons just like you, but with more money, that are making it impossible to win here.
MAYBE.
MAYBE.
Take your grandpa football ideals and shove them up your ass. Hire a good coach this time and GET THE FUCK OUT OF THE WAY.
October 31st, 2014 at 9:25 AM ^
DECAF COFFEE IS FOR BEGINNERS!!!!
October 31st, 2014 at 10:23 AM ^
that RRod only stunk at Michigan?
October 31st, 2014 at 10:49 AM ^
October 31st, 2014 at 7:29 PM ^
30+ years in coaching, unqualified success in all but 3 of them.
Hmmm...looks like a pretty good football coach to me.
Of course I was a Poli Sci major, never did take a statistics course...
October 31st, 2014 at 10:31 AM ^
Jeez Baloo, you've brought back literally every RichRod supporter from the days of 2010. This is vintage board material. I'm swooning with nostalgia.
October 31st, 2014 at 10:32 AM ^
1) Do you really think that Castel was not RR's #1 choice to be his DC?
2) Do you really think that more money would not have increased the odds of bringing Casteel here?
The fact is that RR was not able to bring over his #1 choice and I think you have to be pretty naive if you don't think that more money would not have helped lure Casteel.
October 31st, 2014 at 10:41 AM ^
Team would still be better off right now with Year 8 of Rich Rod and Year 1 of DC #8. Try to bust that myth, Michigan Man.
October 31st, 2014 at 10:53 AM ^
October 31st, 2014 at 3:43 PM ^
there-- That Settles It . . .