Pryor received improper benefits

Submitted by BeantownBlue on
Great investigative work by the Columbus Dispatch reveals how OSU uses "student privacy" to block journalists from getting info on NCAA violations, specifically which athletes are involved. http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2009/05/31/FERP… Check out the last paragraph, where they talk about a recruit who received improper benefits during a 2007 recruiting visit. Without listing Pryor's name, they say he was "a freshman last year" and "was recruited by quarterbacks coach Joe Daniels." Um...any thoughts on who that might be? Let the floodgates open...

Jay

May 31st, 2009 at 7:48 PM ^

I'm in agreement with Huss, here. Does anyone honestly think that none of our recruits or players have ever received a $50 handshake by someone connected to UofM or have had a few free meals thrown their way?

Double Nickel BG

May 31st, 2009 at 5:33 PM ^

too fast. Every program has a position coach thats responsible for a certain part of the country because they lived there, know something about the area that a recruit lives in, or knows high school coaches in that area very well. Just because he was recruited by the QB coach doesnt mean that it was a QB.

therealtruth

May 31st, 2009 at 7:15 PM ^

Or how about we stop obsessing about every little $158 infraction? This was reported to the NCAA, and resolved. It's over. No program, including ours, is 100% clean. Lets stop shrieking about an impossibly small transgression - it makes it seem like we're trying to rationalize getting our ass handed to us for 5 consecutive years.

Rush N Attack

May 31st, 2009 at 7:43 PM ^

makes it seem like we're trying to rationalize getting our ass handed to us for 5 consecutive years." No. It doesn't...since he only actually played us once. If the alleged tansgression happened at Michigan, I would fully expect (and have no problem) with our rivals pointing it out, and having a little fun at our expense. The good news is: I no longer have to wonder what happened to chitownblue.

marco dane

May 31st, 2009 at 8:05 PM ^

Losing has led some to co-op the dreaded *inferiority complex* with our rival. Myself...these things run in cycles. I've lived long enough to witness Michigan time after time dismantle tuos,ranked or unranked. Our turn to *flip the script* just around the corner. I wonder if they have a pill for those who suffer from this syndrome? However,I just visit the Mgoblog vault and picked up this little diddy... Just sayin... http://mgoblog.blogspot.com/2008/01/who-is-ted-sarniak.html

BeantownBlue

May 31st, 2009 at 8:22 PM ^

Just thought it was interesting info that I had not heard before. I don't think $158 is a major deal. But it's interesting to know that a violation was identified. That was new information to me. Were you aware of that info before this article? Also, often with these things, the violations that actually get reported are just the tip of the iceberg. And as a Michigan fan, I am intrigued that the Columbus Dispatch is trying to scratch below the surface. Since cliches have taken over this thread (glass houses, tip of the iceberg), it's only appropriate to say: "Where there's smoke..."

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

May 31st, 2009 at 7:02 PM ^

"The football player received a special, discounted hotel rate and free food while visiting Ohio State." Free food? So, wait, can you feed them BBQ? The rulebook couldn't be more confusing if it were written in Swahili by someone who doesn't know Swahili.

markusr2007

May 31st, 2009 at 8:39 PM ^

where we're all supposed to be "shocked"? Gee, I guess so. The truth is, this kind of behavior is so widespread in college football recruiting, it's just not news. Hundreds of schools do it, and probably several Big Ten schools as well. I know this must be news to some people too, but here it goes: investigative journalism is dead in the U.S. This is because there's simply no pay off for investigative journalism anymore. You simply can't shock or outrage a society of sports fans that have observed things like Switzer, Bonds, Clemens and Neuheisel. The days of the frog marches and public disgrace are so over. Nobody cares. Now, when is "American Idol" on?

BeantownBlue

May 31st, 2009 at 9:17 PM ^

The fact that you (and society) are not fazed by investigative reports does not mean investigative journalism is dead. To the contrary, I think the Internet/blogosphere (where every strand of sports minutiae is examined and commented upon) is only going to boost the leaking of program crippling information. Think investigative journalism is dead? Talk to a USC sports fan. Or a Memphis basketball fan. Or a UConn basketball fan. Or Barry Bonds.

bgvictors

May 31st, 2009 at 9:27 PM ^

Any numbers out there, on how many trips the NCAA has made to Ann Arbor to investigate the FOOTBALL PROGRAM? When Bo and Lloyd spoke of running a clean program it was just lip service. Just because Tressle had all kinds of NCAA violations at Youngstown State doesn't mean that he'd be doing the same things at Ohio State.

markusr2007

May 31st, 2009 at 8:39 PM ^

where we're all supposed to be "shocked"? Gee, I guess so. The truth is, this kind of behavior is so widespread in college football recruiting, it's just not news. Hundreds of schools do it, and probably several Big Ten schools as well. I know this must be news to some people too, but here it goes: investigative journalism is dead in the U.S. This is because there's simply no pay off for investigative journalism anymore. You simply can't shock or outrage a society of sports fans that have observed things like Switzer, Bonds, Clemens and Neuheisel. The days of the frog marches and public disgrace are so over. Nobody cares. Now, when is "American Idol" on?

MCHammer-smooth

May 31st, 2009 at 9:08 PM ^

... isn't "Oh look at what Ohio State does that nobody else does ... just OSU and USC." nor is it ... "why we'd never." The thing about the atricle is that it is 357 (i dont rmember the number exactly) transgressions since 2000 and Fla only was in the 100s. Are there some transgressions that are not going to get reported? Sure, but then there are going to be transgressions at OSU not reported. they have the most reported violations out of any BCS bowl school. If you went on to read the entire article there were much bigger violations than $158. the article is not about how widespread it is in the NCAA. The article is about how widespread it is at OSU. These are the kinds of things I like to hear with my dad being an OSU grad and living in Dayton, Ohio.

BeantownBlue

June 1st, 2009 at 3:21 AM ^

"the article is not about how widespread it is in the NCAA. The article is about how widespread it is at OSU." My point exactly. Obviously $158 is not newsworthy. But the total # of infractions should definitely be ringing alarms. "Lack of institutional control" anyone? And I only mention Pryor because he's the highest profile guy on campus right now and I think it's interesting that he's involved. Period.

jmblue

June 1st, 2009 at 4:15 PM ^

I harbor absolutely no illusions that we're a squeaky-clean program, but that won't stop me from laughing my ass off if Pryor gets ruled ineligible. (Although realistically, this will probably just earn him a suspension of a couple games.)