OT New NCAA NIL Memo is Scary and Stupid

Submitted by Golden section on January 28th, 2023 at 5:07 PM

So the NCAA released a memo that lays out the the new standard for NIL violations.

https://twitter.com/WinterSportsLaw/status/1619081230422790145/photo/1

 

It is deemed impermissible contact when an institutional staff member directly or indirectly contacts a prospect who is not in the NCAA Transfer Portal to discuss NIL opportunities.

What constitutes indirect contact? If a staff member is using a booster or an NIL collective as a go-between, then doesn't that fall within the scope of indirect contact?

Not only has this been happening, it's very likely staff members were very much directly involved in contacting prospects to discuss specifics about potential NIL deals.

Do they think a bushel full of 5* went to TA&M without being offered specific deals?

The memo also says that if a representative of the institution's athletics interests, which includes boosters and collectives, contacts a prospect or their family about potential NIL opportunities prior to the prospect signing with the institution, then that is an impermissible contact. WTF? How do they police that?  I hate to break it to the NCAA, but this is likely occurring with every single 4 and 5-star prospect. These might be tough measures but what is the toothless NCAA going too do about it?

WayOfTheRoad

January 28th, 2023 at 5:15 PM ^

By indirect they mean the most common way to communicate, which is through a 3rd party. That's how most of it goes. The school will use a player on their team that knows them or their old HS coach to contact the kid/family. They relay the info and if interest is mutual they hit the portal and go.

Rarely do these kids call an old recruiter from a school they passed on and ask if they're still wanted.

It still doesn't matter though. This will all go unenforced while The NCAA looks for cheeseburger crimes. As long as all the top programs do it, they won't enforce it and like NIL it's hard to prove intent. You'd have to have a time stamped communication to prove a player was not yet in the portal before talking to the new school. To enforce it you'd have to have power to monitor all communications of players and institutions  and that's a massive LOL to even consider.

Grampy

January 28th, 2023 at 5:18 PM ^

Nothing. If the feckless enforcement arm of the NCAA couldn’t stop cheaters before NIL,  they aren’t going to start now. This decree is more about justifying having their skim off the top of college athletics’ dump truck of money. 

JMo

January 28th, 2023 at 6:04 PM ^

Correct. This isn't about schools/affiliates using NIL packages to entice recruits. This is about what is commonly referred to as "tampering."  If a player is NOT in the Transfer Portal, then a school or its affiliates cannot have direct or indirect NIL conversations with that player.

Not permittable:

"Hey kid, if you jump in the portal we'll give you this yacht!"

Permittable:

"Hey kid that's currently in the portal, how would you like a yacht in exchange for an appearance at my boat store, afterl,of course, you sign with my favorite school?"

trustBlue

January 28th, 2023 at 5:20 PM ^

I dont think this is very different from the current rules, which already prohibit "tampering" with enrolled prospects prior to entering the transfer portal. 

Chaco

January 28th, 2023 at 5:25 PM ^

Wonder how much $ was spent writing this important guidance that I’m sure will be adopted with great speed, consistency and reverence.

Mr. Elbel

January 28th, 2023 at 5:39 PM ^

I think this is the NCAA attempting to make threats and protect amateurism when it’s all over anyway. It may not be the final attempt at a power grab, but it certainly is a last ditch effort for the sinking ship that is the ncaa.

Mr. Elbel

January 28th, 2023 at 5:39 PM ^

I think this is the NCAA attempting to make threats and protect amateurism when it’s all over anyway. It may not be the final attempt at a power grab, but it certainly is a last ditch effort for the sinking ship that is the ncaa.

LDNfan

January 28th, 2023 at 5:50 PM ^

Think you are conflating recruiting out of HS and inducing guys to enter the portal. TAMU signed all those 5-stars out of HS for essentially pay for play. Which is also supppposssed to be illegal. Yeah right...

You can't make it make sense...NIL as a recruiting tool is always going to be a dirty, hot mess. Harbaugh was right the university experience should be transformational over transactional. Unfortunately, there's way too much money involved so that may not be realistic. 

Ham

January 28th, 2023 at 5:55 PM ^

The quoted part sounds like it is only in reference to players already on a college team and not in the portal, not high school players.

vondonation

January 28th, 2023 at 6:23 PM ^

We obviously know the answer. They are going to flex some muscle with some Level II violations for a $20 burger. The new motto for the NCAA “where we strain gnats and swallow camels.”

gremlin3

January 28th, 2023 at 6:34 PM ^

NCAA Operating Procedures:

  1. Make a stupid-ass rule.
  2. Let everyone violate the hell out of it for decades with no punishment.
  3. Catch Michigan accidentally doing it once.
  4. Drag investigation out as long as possible to harm Michigan recruiting as much as possible.
  5. Give Michigan scholarship reductions and post-season bans.
  6. Rescind the rule immediately after Michigan is caught, but continue to punish only Michigan.

Previous victims include: Jamaal Crawford, Mitch McGary, Rich Rodriguez, Jim Harbaugh

RLARCADIACA

January 28th, 2023 at 6:39 PM ^

Could it be that the NCAA “selectively” decides what institutions they attempt to apply this so called law to?  For example the NCAA does not like how an institution or individual there responds to possible violation.  They then dig this up.  Of course the NCAA will never admit this but watch and see if this is selectively applied maybe even close by.

Meteorite00

January 28th, 2023 at 6:42 PM ^

I wouldn’t read too much into the “direct of indirect” language— it’s a pretty common legal standard for things like witness tampering and it’d be kinda odd to leave it out

the bizarre theater of putting out a rule without any expectation it will be followed or intent to enforce it is the odd part of all this for me.