Michigan and OSU versus common opponents - some data

Submitted by milk-n-steak on November 20th, 2023 at 7:44 AM

I thought it might be interesting to look at how Michigan and OSU have done against the seven common Big Ten opponents this year: Indiana, Maryland, Michigan State, Minnesota, Penn State, Purdue, and Rutgers.  

I present the compiled info for information and perusal.

Vasav

November 20th, 2023 at 10:02 AM ^

This is a good point. These teams do look similar on paper but OSU typically needed 4 quarters, whereas M typically chilled after 3 in most games.

 

Edit: I'm still expecting a close game. But I feel good about our squad. This is the best offense we've faced and the second best D we've faced. Gotta make some plays to win.

WestQuad

November 20th, 2023 at 9:30 AM ^

Wasn't Jaxon Smith-Njigba hurt too? 

McCord seems to be getting into a groove against the easy part of OSU's schedule, but I'd still say that they are less explosive than they were last year.

McCord+Harrison(Jr)+Egbuka(Jr)+Fleming(Sr)+Henderson < Stroud+Harrison(So)+Egbuka(so)+Fleming(Jr)+Trayanum/Williams

That said, all of their skill players this year were five stars except Harrison.  They are a very dangerous team especially if they get some momentum.

BallsoHarb

November 20th, 2023 at 9:40 AM ^

I’ve watched them pretty closely all year, and I think McCord has only looked better because the run game couldn’t be stopped by the last two teams. He’s not bad, but if he has to get into the second/third read or scramble the throw is almost always off. He cannot escape like Taulia can (not sure if that’s his athleticism or his ankle injury he’s had pretty much all year).

MGlobules

November 20th, 2023 at 8:01 AM ^

Encouraging. Michigan just needs to play with determination and purpose, to play their game (as the cliche has it).

I know that Vegas odds are designed to elicit bets, which is the business that houses are in. But a preliminary look at this might suggest that we should be a slightly bigger favorite at home.

Hotel Putingrad

November 20th, 2023 at 8:05 AM ^

Hasn't the team with more rushing yards won The Game pretty much every year this century?

Good info, presented in an aesthetically pleasing format.

If Harbaugh were on the sideline I'd feel pretty confident. But it's getting harder to dismiss the drop-off in JJ's play when he's not.

Michigan4Life

November 20th, 2023 at 8:06 AM ^

I forgot when they changed the run scheme, but Ryan Day went away from OZ and run exclusively weak IZ/counter OH team with some gap run scheme. Their run game has gone a lot better since then. TreVeyon Henderson has been on a tear since getting back to the field from an injury. That's an another dimension that Michigan defense has to deal with in addition to trying to cover MHJ and Egbuka. 

Biggest concern for Michigan is their ability to cover their WRs. They showed a lot of crack in coverage that Maryland quite frankly didn't take advantage of it

LostPatrol14

November 20th, 2023 at 8:27 AM ^

I agree but wanted to add a few things.

JJ hasn't looked 100% out there, at least to me anyways. His game has been off the past couple of weeks. That worries me.

Then, what's going on with the OLine? We have had two injuries, and those injuries appear to have been playing a huge part in this offense. Very noticeable, unfortunately.

The only question I have about OSU is: How good is Kyle McCord? He didn't look good against Penn State's defense, but then again, he does have one of the best players in college football in Marvin Harrison, Jr to throw to, but McCord, himself, didn't impress me. MHj won that game for Ohio State, not McCord.

Michigan4Life

November 20th, 2023 at 9:50 AM ^

Will Johnson is going to be a 1st round pick in '25 draft, but MHJ will still be cooking this Saturday. The key is to limit the damage elsewhere.

McCord has been up and down and is a clear downgrade from Haskins, Fields and Stroud. I think Ryan Day knows it and relied more on the run game to help him out.

Michigan OL isn't nearly as good as they were the last two seasons and the OT is a clear weakness. November hasn't been kind to them pass pro wise IMO. 

Michigan would need to lean onto the run game and make sure the defense can limit the damage outside of MHJ. 

pastor_of_muppets

November 20th, 2023 at 8:41 AM ^

I really hate to say this but since Henderson came back (Wisconsin) they've looked a ton better running the ball. Before the Wisconsin game they were averaging 3.8 ypc on the season and since then their average has gone up to 4.3 ypc on the year. Wisconsin, Rutgers, MSU and Minnesota have been their opponents in that time.

I don't think that Henderson is as great a back as most OSU fans think he is and I can't comment on what their coaches have done to make their running game operate more smoothly, but there's no doubt that it actually is something that needs to be gameplanned for at this point in the season. Unfortunately they don't look like the same team that went for 1.9 yards per carry at home against Maryland.

BallsoHarb

November 20th, 2023 at 10:29 AM ^

That’s fair, if I remember right he took Egbuka, Harrison and Henderson out earlier than McCord, so most of the offensive production was on the bench. The numbers are very close, but I think if we parsed the data further we’d see Michigan’s starters numbers with a slightly larger advantage than what is shown (granted, only slightly). 

Arb lover

November 20th, 2023 at 8:07 AM ^

Interceptions thrown is listed twice. The first time Michigan's common opponent has 10 interceptions. Second time is 8. I assume one of those didn't get updated. Hopefully in a week the real number is 14.

DelhiWolverine

November 20th, 2023 at 10:23 AM ^

I get the sarcasm, but wanted to make a sign-stealing point here that I haven't heard made yet.

Everyone who has their panties in a bunch over the VERY SERIOUS SIGN STEALING has said that it gives Michigan an unprecedented advantage. But (as we all know) sign stealing is perfectly legal and most teams in the league do it.

Before the NCAA (or the Big 10) doles out punishment, they really need to investigate how many of Michigan's signs our opponents have stolen. That's the only way that you could determine how much of an advantage Michigan's advance scouting practices actually provided them. My guess is that Stalions' advance scouting *may* have helped him decipher a higher amount of opponents' signs, but it doesn't translate into as great of an advantage if our opponents have also deciphered a significant number of our signs.

brad

November 20th, 2023 at 10:33 AM ^

All of Michigan’s signs have been deciphered and shared amongst, you have to assume, every big ten team.  I have Michigan’s signs, and you have them, they’re the only teams’ sings that have been published in full on the internet.  There has been no competitive advantage whatsoever.