JT Barrett arrested for OVI early Saturday morning

Submitted by bballislife22 on

Per Eleven Warriors:

http://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2015/10/62430/sources…

Eleven Warriors:

"According to two sources within the Columbus Police Department, Ohio State quarterback J.T. Barrett was arrested for operating a motor vehicle while impaired (OVI) early Saturday morning near campus.

Barrett was arrested near High and Tompkins, just north of Campus after policed noticed the player attempt to avoid an OVI checkpoint in the area. Per CPD sources, Barrett was cooperative and blew into a breathalyzer, registering slightly over Ohio's legal limit of 0.08 blood-alcohol concentration.

The quarterback was released to his teammate, fellow quarterback Cardale Jones, who provided Barrett a ride home.

Ohio State did not respond to a request for comment.

We'll have more on this as it develops."

 

Pretty crazy. You hate to see this regardless of the situation or circumstances. 

Ohio State is on its bye week this week.

Tater

October 31st, 2015 at 9:35 AM ^

In Ann Arbor, where athletes don't get preferential treatment, he would have been in jail for the night.  If he was anyone else, he would have been in jail for the night.  But he was "released" to "Ain't come here to play school" Cardale Jones?

The cop should be fired.

 

The Geek

October 31st, 2015 at 9:57 AM ^

light bail and you're free to go. Police are well versed in the procedures and I doubt very highly he gave even the slightest hint of preferential treatment to JT. 

Most cops would probably prefer they are released, imho. I wouldn't want to babysit a beligerant drunk if I didn't have to. 

weasel3216

October 31st, 2015 at 10:31 AM ^

They are required to be announced to the public in some form (mostly website and local news) at least in the state of Ohio. I assume this is to avoid the appearance of a sting operation (setup up outside a bar). Obviously most college kids don't watch local news or think about check the local police authorities websites before going out for the night.

Ric8057

October 31st, 2015 at 10:53 AM ^

I went through a checkpoint once. There were very large, flashing traffic signs at least 2 miles before it warning what's coming. There were also about 15 possible turns to make before I saw any cops. If you get busted at a checkpoint you should get 15 years for stupidity.

g_dubya

October 31st, 2015 at 11:50 AM ^

Maybe before saying something like that you could actually read the article.  Yes, there are warnings and turns before the checkpoint.  There are also generally police stationed at each of those possible escapes and they pull you over for evading the checkpoint.  Just like what it says happened.

"If you get busted at a checkpoint you should get 15 years for stupidity."

You should learn how things work before making such ridiculous statements.

robbyt003

October 31st, 2015 at 8:48 AM ^

I am a normal person and can find rides when drinking or I just take Uber.  He is a high profile athlete, you would think he could find someone to drive him when he drinks.  

xtramelanin

October 31st, 2015 at 9:15 AM ^

they are nevertheless legal if there is pre-approved plan filed with the court and narrowly tailored in terms of time, duration, and who/how they detain people.

Polisci

October 31st, 2015 at 9:20 AM ^

Well, one argument would be that it's a search without probable cause. It assumes everyone driving down a road at a particular time is guilty until proven innocent.

Of course, courts have sided with the police on this topic.

bostonsix

October 31st, 2015 at 9:14 AM ^

a month here in Ohio. The police have to announce where and when the checkpoints will be roughly two days ahead of said check point. The local news and radio news also run short clips on where and when they will be. You can also find them on almost every news stations website. I don't drive after drinking, but someone who does can easily avoid them.

HenneGivenSunday

October 31st, 2015 at 9:14 AM ^

Great question... It's one that I wondered aloud when I moved to Ohio. That's the piece of this that bothers me the most. I am obviously against drunk driving (so nobody jump on my ass there), but these goddamn checkpoints are questionable at best IMHO (though I am not a lawyer, so I don't have any idea).



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad