Joe Lunardi sucks

Submitted by mgofro on

how the F does Lunardi *still* have a 19-13 SEC team with zero good nonconference wins in over M?

— mgoblog (@mgoblog) March 11, 2016

@mgoblog pic.twitter.com/CwuCYeoRse

— Abraham May (@Smoothitron) March 11, 2016

Add St. Mary's and its zero nonconf road wins & and Syracuse at 19-13 with a 9-10 conf record losing 4 of last 5. https://t.co/sUg9kniccb

— MGoBlueBD (@MGoBlueBD) March 11, 2016

St Mary's is in the WCC. They played one noncon game against a team better than 89th in Kenpom, and lost that game.

— mgoblog (@mgoblog) March 11, 2016

That is all...

BOX House

March 11th, 2016 at 3:34 PM ^

WTF? Everyone says Michigan needs to beat Indiana in the B1G Tourney to get in... I pin my hopes on beating Indiana, all week long. 

Now it's not enough? Bilas and Lunardi both saying we're out? Talk about a dongpunch.

King Douche Ornery

March 11th, 2016 at 3:46 PM ^

I wonder if you guys would be worrying so much about an 8-4 football team headed to the Poulan Weedeater Bowl.

Cuz that's about the level  on which Beilein has his basketball program.

JCV16

March 11th, 2016 at 3:46 PM ^

UConn and GW both looking like they're going to win. 

We seem to have some stupid groupthink working against us. Everyone is obsessing over that top 100 RPI record and giving the 4 top 25 wins and zero bad losses no credence whatsoever. 

umchicago

March 11th, 2016 at 3:56 PM ^

we are 3-4 against the top 4 teams in the BIG, plus a win against TX; no bad losses.  that should be enough.  

i don't get how wisky is solidly in and we are out.  wisky is now 12-7 in BIG.  we are 12-8.  wisky is 3-5 against the top 4 teams in BIG.  but i guess they beat us.  UConn beat us too.

ESNY

March 11th, 2016 at 5:01 PM ^

Its crazy that there is so much focus on the top 100 wins and not enough on bad losses.  If you lose to a team outside of the top 200, you should be fucking stellar against the top teams to offset that, not just some wins against teams in the 75-100 range.   Not to mention, syracuse somehow getting a pass for going 4-5 when their coach was suspending for violating NCAA rules

gwkrlghl

March 11th, 2016 at 4:02 PM ^

I've never understood bracketology guys saying that the mid-major at 24-7 with no relevant wins is getting screwed when the 21-10 (9-9) major team with a solid SOS gets in over them. I'm like, ok their record is shiny, but you do know Michigan would easily have the same record or better against the same schedule, right?

I Just Blue Myself

March 11th, 2016 at 4:31 PM ^

I think the Big Ten will get seven teams in, so in my opinion it will come down to either UM or OSU. If I had to guess, it would be the team that goes further in this tourney. I highly doubt the Big Ten gets eight teams, so it would be absolutely crazy if the title came down to Michigan vs. Ohio State. 

Yeoman

March 11th, 2016 at 5:28 PM ^

A lot of the committee's description of their own work is smoke-blowing, but one thing they say that I think is borne out in the results is that they do not think this way. There's no "this is a 7-bid league" going on--you get what you get on each team's merits. OSU in wouldn't bump Michigan out unless they were already last on the bubble.

 

 

I Just Blue Myself

March 11th, 2016 at 6:27 PM ^

That's true and a good point. However the only conference to receive more than seven bids is the Big East, which they did multiple times. Granted, that's when they had Syracuse, Louisville, Cincy, West Virginia, Notre Dame, UCONN, etc. But still, every conference outside of the Big East has never had over seven bids. Even if 22 win OSU and 22 win Michigan make the title game, I would be willing to bet the loser of that game is on the outside looking in.

But what do I know? 

Walter Sobchak

March 11th, 2016 at 4:31 PM ^

Michigan's record against the top 26 is 4-6, which is better than most bubble teams. They should be in.

Yeoman

March 11th, 2016 at 5:21 PM ^

St. Mary's is 33 at kenpom--if anything, the 10 or 11 seed they're liable to get is too low.

Monmouth is the Lunardi pick I can't fathom. There's nothing there but Sportscenter hype and one good win four months ago.

Muttley

March 11th, 2016 at 6:57 PM ^

 

 

 

Team Result Opponent
Last Four Byes ------ --------
St Joseph's W 86-80 George Washington
USC Done  
Oregon State Done  
St Bonaventure 9PM vs Davidson
Last Four In ------ --------
Pittsburgh Done  
Monmouth Done  
Vanderbilt Done  
St Mary's Done  
First Four Out ------ --------
Syracuse Done  
Connecticut W 104-97 Cincinatti
Tulsa 9PM vs Memphis
Valpariso Done  
Next Four Out ------ --------
Florida L 72-66 Texas A&M
Michigan W 72-69 Indiana
Ohio State 6:30PM vs Michigan State
George Washington L 86-80 St Joseph's

Click on team to see RPI breakdown

Maizen

March 11th, 2016 at 7:38 PM ^

He just said on ESPN that Michigan is out because they lost to "11 tournament teams". Meanwhile he has Monmouth in who has lost to Army, Canisius, and Richmond. He also has USC, Wichita State, and St Mary's all in even though Michigan has more RPI top 25 wins than all those teams combined.

This is nuts. I can't believe Michigan actually might not make the tourney after today's win. 

smwilliams

March 11th, 2016 at 8:25 PM ^

Here's how Michigan stacks up with some bubble teams on the RPI sheet.

Vandy is 19-13. Michigan is 21-11. Vandy is 2-6 against the Top 50. Michigan is 3-6. Vandy is 7-10 versus the Top 100. Michigan is 4-11. Vandy's NC SOS is 43. Michigan's is 207. Vandy has 3 losses outside the Top 100. Michigan has 0.

If the committee takes Vandy over Michigan, they're doing so because of that Top 100 # and the SOS.

A 22-11 Big 10 team with absolutely no bad losses and 4 wins against RPI Top 25 teams should not be left out of the tournament.

Jimmyisgod

March 12th, 2016 at 12:39 AM ^

Some teams that won bumped us. We have a shot with a loss tomorrow, but it's no better than 50-50 because of some upsets that really hurt our chances. Damn.