B1G defenses dominate SP+ rankings

Submitted by BuckeyeChuck on September 29th, 2019 at 8:20 PM

The B1G boasts 4 of the top 6 defenses according to SP+ through Week 5, and THE TOP 3!

#1 Wisconsin

#2 MSU

#3 OSU

#6 Michigan

Also 5 of the top 11 (Northwestern #11), 6 of the top 16 (Penn St #16), and 7 of the top 22 (Iowa #22). That's half the conference among the top 25 defenses. There's going to be plenty of slobberknocker games ahead!

Other observations:

  • Only 4 offenses rank among the top 25 in SP+, and two of them are Minniesoda (#14!) and Purdue (#20)!
  • Wisconsin offense ranks as low as 28, after a poor performance against NW, only 1 spot ahead of Indiana (?!), leading a batch of 5 B1G offenses among the 7 spots from 28-34.
  • Indiana is surprisingly 29th overall, though only good enough for 5th best among East Division teams.
  • Minniesoda has crept up to 3rd best in the West (33rd overall). With the easiest B1G in-conference schedule, they're going to hang around in the West race longer than they ordinarily should.

As for next week:

  • Iowa's #30 offense goes up against Michigan's #6 defense, while Michigan's #48 offense goes up against Iowa's #22 defense.
  • OSU's #5 offense goes up against MSU's #2 defense, while MSU's #62 offense goes up against OSU's #3 defense.

xtramelanin

September 29th, 2019 at 8:24 PM ^

after what wisconsin did to us that is quite surprising.  

EDIT:  i have a feeling that ohio's offense is going to curb-stomp sparty's D, but you have to give dintiny credit, the guy will have his team show up.  

andrewgr

September 29th, 2019 at 11:33 PM ^

MSU is going to get curb-stomped.  They'll be down 4 scores by the half.  

Meyer was stubborn and stuck with his running game no matter what, and MSU took advantage and beat him twice.

Day does not give a single shit about "establishing the run" or "being balanced".  If they give him the pass, he'll launch a "Fields for Heisman" campaign by calling 50 pass plays.

tsabesi

September 29th, 2019 at 8:33 PM ^

It's worth noting that the rankings are still heavily weighted on projections coming into the year, but also most top teams have probably only played one real game across the board so to the extent SP+ is biased towards different schedule types that should be somewhat mitigated.

andrewgr

September 29th, 2019 at 11:36 PM ^

In fairness, Ohio State's defense was perennially top 10 for the better part of two decades.  Last year, and to a lesser degree the year before, were really, really big deviations.  I tend to think they would have been back to top 10-ish defense with any average or above averager coordinator running any reasonable scheme (as opposed to Schiano playing his LBs on the line of scrimmage and having them turn and run backwards at the snap).

Connie_Bow

September 29th, 2019 at 9:00 PM ^

I kinda don't put a lot of weight in S&P when Michigan's defense can get trucked so bad one week, then play one of the worst teams next week, and look good, and have that much of a rise in it.

Gulogulo37

September 30th, 2019 at 5:45 AM ^

Many people here don't seem to get SP+ adjusts for opponents. And then they'll say well it's still trash and the rankings don't make sense, except that you can't find a more accurate predictor than SP+. Better than Vegas.