Another gem from Nick B. on JJ McCarthy
Paywall but worth getting the subscription. Here's a preview:
https://theathletic.com/3612121/2022/09/21/jj-mccarthy-jim-harbaugh-michigan-qbs/
Jim Harbaugh had seen enough. And, as part of his plan allowed, so had everyone else.
“We’ll start J.J. next week,” Harbaugh said, minutes after Michigan’s 56-10 win over Hawaii two weeks ago. It was the culmination of a year-long QB battle, one that couldn’t be decided in spring or summer or training camp. The increase in performance was undeniable and had probably been so for a good minute. “By merit, he’s earned that.”
And, just like that, J.J. McCarthy officially became the Michigan quarterback.
Future’s never final and Harbaugh, once a member of that QB club himself, has already told McCarthy that job he’s now presiding over is rented and not owned. Payment’s due every Saturday. Cade McNamara’s injury situation obviously complicates that situation for Michigan, but the elevation of McCarthy — a former five-star passer who seemed destined for this job during glimpses as a freshman a year ago — felt inevitable.
And, for No. 4 Michigan, it could be a season-changer.
One of the things Harbaugh has long sold to quarterbacks in the recruiting process is that if they come to Michigan, they’ll have the opportunity to not only work in a pro-style offense (the definition of which, of course, evolves along with the game) but also the chance to work like a pro-style quarterback.
Michigan’s QBs aren’t constantly in situations where they’re going to the line of scrimmage with one play, then standing and waiting for the coaches on the sideline to read the coverage for them. That’s not a thing in the NFL. And while Michigan has used “check with me” stuff before, it’s not really a thing in Ann Arbor, either. More often than not, Harbaugh’s quarterbacks are required to do that work on their own.
September 21st, 2022 at 8:50 AM ^
Work like a pro style QB. This is a great line.
There’s another QB who has spoken about how he learned to prepare while he was in college. He wound up playing a few games on Sunday, and coincidentally - played a few snaps for Michigan while he was in college.
That other QB… his name is Tom Brady.
September 21st, 2022 at 3:38 PM ^
One interesting aspect of Brady”s time at Michigan is that , according to Brady in 2001, he was not allowed at Michigan to change the play call. I always suspected it hurt Navarre for everyone to know that no call would ever change (but maybe everybody knew that). Things are different now.
September 21st, 2022 at 9:23 AM ^
Who’s got it better than us?
September 21st, 2022 at 9:43 AM ^
Hmmmm… that’s a tough question..
No… Body…!!!!
September 21st, 2022 at 9:46 AM ^
No, buddy.
September 22nd, 2022 at 6:02 PM ^
No Bootie?? Wait, what?
September 21st, 2022 at 11:05 AM ^
I mean, I guess define better first? Like in terms of sports success? Well then quite a few organizations have it better.
September 21st, 2022 at 9:57 AM ^
Thanks for sharing. The Athletic posts some great stuff. It's one of the few sites I've found other than this one where you get level-headed, non-sensationalized coverage.
And I have to agree that JJ starting could be the "season-changer" for us.
September 21st, 2022 at 10:05 AM ^
Great job summarizing/clipping a paywalled article, OP! Lots of people should learn from your fine example.
We've seen repeatedly that Harbaugh expects a lot out of his QB's, but he also expects it from the rest of his offense. Back in the day, when Pep Hamilton was around, he was trying to run NFL-like routes with decidely not NFL-like WRs. Well, at least with WR's that knew nothing of those concepts at the time. I don't think Pep taught the routes, combos, coverages, and reads very well because that offense was usually on different pages. But, starting with Gattis, I believe Harbaugh has finally hit on a combination of coaches that are all teaching their units to see the same things and react how they're supposed to for said situation. And he also - finally - has a QB that can run it efficiently.
We get two years with McCarthy, so lets enjoy the living hell out of it!
September 21st, 2022 at 5:28 PM ^
Pretty sure we get more than two unless he decides to leave early. Unless I missed something?
*I'm an idiot and thought JJ had a COVID year*
September 21st, 2022 at 10:39 AM ^
I wonder what would have happened if the in-season QB competition would have taken place in 2020. Would Milton and McCaffrey have stayed if they both were given a game to win the starting job? Do we lose to Sparty if Dylan starts Game 2? I'm happy were things are, but I feel like putting both QBs out there in a game situation was a stroke of genius in hindsight.
September 21st, 2022 at 10:47 AM ^
Our DB's were pummeled by yellow hankies in the 2020 MSU game. I'd start there.
September 21st, 2022 at 10:44 AM ^
The question is, "Do recruits really want to be in a pro QB style offense in college?"
It isn't like Michigan is seeing top QB talent clamor to come to Michigan on a yearly basis.
Rudock, McNamara, McCarthy are so far the three that have shown what a good QB can do for the team with Cade being at the forefront of producing outstanding results with his season last year.
Maybe the key to having QB success at Michigan is just recruit guys with "Mc" starting as the first part of their last name.
September 21st, 2022 at 11:42 AM ^
The idea that Michigan has not recruited the QB position well under Harbaugh is overblown. Dylan McCaffrey, Brandon Peters, and to a lesser extent Joe Milton were all highly regarded recruits. The only two seasons we whiffed were the year our guy medically retired and last season.
September 21st, 2022 at 12:05 PM ^
It's not that Michigan hasn't recruited well, the idea is that Harbaugh whiffs on developing good recruits. Peters and McCaffrey did very little for us, and they were are two star recruits leading up to McCarthy.
September 21st, 2022 at 5:10 PM ^
To be fair, those three have all left, played elsewhere, and still looked terrible so don't think you can blame that on development.
September 22nd, 2022 at 8:28 AM ^
I stand by that Speight and Peters were both good QBs who were physically and mentally ruined by injuries
September 21st, 2022 at 12:06 PM ^
Speight and Patterson had seasons that were every bit as good, and probably better, than McNamara’s 2021. McNamara just had the good fortune of being part of a better team.
September 21st, 2022 at 1:04 PM ^
I would argue that Speight was two injuries away from leading this team to back-to-back wins vs OSU. He was limited in 2016 and the 2017 game was for the taking. Dude had terrible injury luck in college.
September 21st, 2022 at 1:44 PM ^
And the defense gave up 118 points in Patterson’s two games against them, so he never had a chance.
September 21st, 2022 at 3:59 PM ^
Speight didn’t play in the 2017 game. That was O’Korn. Or are you saying 17 was winnable if it weren’t for his injury?
September 21st, 2022 at 4:03 PM ^
Don't mind this post...
September 21st, 2022 at 5:30 PM ^
September 21st, 2022 at 6:53 PM ^
Despite the poor performance earlier in that game, Michigan still had the ball at our 27 with 2:47 to go and two timeouts and only trailing 24-20.
Cade gets a lot of credit from people for being the QB that finally beat OSU after such a long time, but we were pretty damn close to John Freakin’ O’Korn being that guy. Crazy to think about the worst QB since Sheridan/Threet potentially being the one to get us over the hump.
September 21st, 2022 at 10:45 AM ^
There is one thing that I think has been essential for this team to get to where they are - and, that is blocking. Blocking by the OL, the RB's, the TE's, the WR's - everyone.
That blocking has led to 1) effective protection for the QB in passing situations, and 2) opening of holes for the RB's.
To no one's surprise - this is both foundational and fundamental. But, at this level - precision and quality of execution make the difference.
"Practice does not make perfect. Only perfect practice makes perfect." - Vincent Thomas Lombardi
September 21st, 2022 at 10:46 AM ^
The Michigan Difference, compared to the other guys.
As a lifelong Bears fan, my immediate reax to the trade to get Fields was: "NOOOO!" To paraphrase a joke from Airplane!, "Here is a pamphlet on great OSU QBs in the NFL." Only, there isn't enough information to fill out even a pamphlet. I have made this reference before, but in case you didn't see: Name the only OSU QB who took a snap as QB in a Superbowl? Mike Tomczak (bet you didn't know that, or, don't know of him at all). (Fourth quarter third-string mop-up duty for Da Bears in SB XX over Pats... back in 1986). Or, the only OSU QB who started in the Superbowl? It's a trick question, it's Tom Tupa... but he started as a punter.
One more datapoint. OSU decided [edited] another guy was better than that other guy, who then transfers to LSU, becomes the greatest college QB ever, goes #1, and is in the Superbowl two years later. That doesn't make OSU's decision-making process for QB look very good.
My point is, the list of great OSU QBs is ever-evolving. But the list of great OSU QBs who go on to NFL stardom is waiting to have its first entry. Why do these great QBs go there? Guess that rookie contract for a couple years looks awesome.
September 21st, 2022 at 11:41 AM ^
I thought Burrow transferred because he lost the starting job to Haskins and then Haskins blew up and left early? Maybe I'm misremembering that.
There wasn't a good QB on the roster after that and OSU had to pray that Fields would transfer there and be eligible since instant eligibility wasn't a thing yet.
September 21st, 2022 at 11:49 AM ^
Weimy,
IIRC - one of the reasons why Fields was allowed to transfer from Georgia with immediate eligibility was the caustic, oppressive, and threatening environment that might have brought Fields' safety into question.
Of course - it was such a threatening environment that Fields' sister remained enrolled at Georgia.
September 21st, 2022 at 12:37 PM ^
Yep, I remember that. That one NCAA decision made such a world of difference for OSU that year. Without Fields, they lose probably four games, with him, they're in the playoff.
September 21st, 2022 at 11:43 AM ^
No to the paywall. New York Times gets none of my money
September 21st, 2022 at 12:07 PM ^
Well you're missing out. Nick is the best in the business. I'd likely cringe at your reasoning as a marine.
September 21st, 2022 at 12:08 PM ^
Nobody cares.
September 21st, 2022 at 12:37 PM ^
You people from the two tribes are a lot more alike than you seem to recognize. The NYTimes has worked with the CIA to boost every war the DOD has ever cooked up, for Dems and Republicans alike. (They want you to forget that they boosted Bush's phony war in Iraq.)
Whether you have a blue or a red ring through your nose probably shouldn't decide whether you read The Athletic, but whether there's information of value to be had there. Nobody's forcing you to read about what kind of apartment you can get for a million dollars in Manhattan, society weddings, or what the princess was wearing to the funeral.
Times sports section has certainly shrunk over the years, but if you're interested in cultural angles on sports--and like to read--it's still sometimes pretty good.
It's all capitalism, top to bottom out there, whether anyone likes it or not. The people ginning up the civil wars are just using that angle to sell you stuff. Starting with our Aussie Uncle Rupert, who--we should probably all take for granted--is not a U.S. patriot.
:)
September 21st, 2022 at 4:21 PM ^
It's not all just capitalism out there. Capitalism, yes -- and another thing, which can exert control over capitalism, that people have struggled over for all of history.
September 21st, 2022 at 6:24 PM ^
Do you mean-- friendship?
September 21st, 2022 at 1:18 PM ^
Does Newsmax cover football?
September 21st, 2022 at 12:30 PM ^
Great--important--last paragraph.
September 21st, 2022 at 1:41 PM ^
I really like Nick B as a columnist in relation to his dissection of Michigan football in terms that I can readily understand. I'm not an X's and O's guy, never played or coached, and when I read the UFR columns I skip all of the play by play/formation stuff and go straight to the somewhat broader analysis below it. I don't skip the play by play description because I'm lazy or don't care; I quite frankly can't follow it. Too granular. And I say that not to criticize Brian or Seth or anyone else, I'm just admitting that at that level it's like bits and bytes to a non-CS/IT person.
This column by Nick B highlights JJ's unique skillset, particularly as a passer, while also acknowledging his foot speed and elusiveness, and how Michigan's offense is primed for high level success in a way not seen around these parts since the days of, ummm, I don't know when?
My top 5 Michigan QB's from my lifetime of following (since 1973) are: Dennis Franklin, John Wangler, Jim Harbaugh, Brian Griese, and Chad Henne (in chronological order). We need to see a lot more from JJ to put him up there but his potential makes it seem likely if he stays healthy.
September 21st, 2022 at 2:49 PM ^
Exactly why I like his writing so much. He strikes the perfect balance between beat writer summaries that say nothing and UFRs.
September 21st, 2022 at 8:17 PM ^
Rick Leach?
September 21st, 2022 at 9:10 PM ^
Really good article by Nick, and definitely worth reading. The Athletic has some really great content on the Pistons, Lions, Tigers and Red Wings as well. All of the Detroit teams have really good coverage there.