3 UM Basketball Prospects on U18 Men's National Team

Submitted by StephenRKass on

The U18 Men's National Baskeball Team has 18 finalists. Three of them are Michigan prospects:

  • Keion Brooks
  • DJ Carton
  • Mark Watts

That's a very high proportion of the U18 team. Carton and Brooks are top 30 guys, and Watts isn't far behind at #51. Future is bright! (As long as Beilein stays in Ann Arbor.)

LINK:  USA Basketball U18 Men's National Team Roster

Of course there is a long way to go yet. But with Jalen Wilson already committed, and Michigan in a good position with all three of the above kids, this is a good thing. Should the Wolverines get Wilson and Carton, and any one of Brooks, Watts, and McDaniels, that would be the best back-to-back classes ever under Beilein.

Matt EM

June 4th, 2018 at 9:46 AM ^

Carton only measured at 5’10.5 without shoes........and that was my reluctance in granting him a fifth star in my rankings. That said, he has legit explosion and can compete with elite prospects from an athletic standpoint. Would love to have him. Watts measured at 6’1 without shoes, a bit small for a combo/shooting guard. McDaniels came in at 6’9 without shoes.......which is absolutely insane given his skillset.

BigBlue02

June 4th, 2018 at 9:58 AM ^

You and I share the same outlook on how good we could be with McDaniels, so I’m curious what your thoughts on us actually landing him are? I know you have mentioned Howard as a relative being a positive and that the coaches are in contact with him daily, but what are your thoughts on him actually committing to us? 50/50? 60/40? 100/0? Lol

Matt EM

June 4th, 2018 at 10:16 AM ^

and what I know privately are distinct at times. That said, I’d say we have a reasonable shot as of right now and make up part of his informal top 5. He’s not looking to decide any time soon so that may work in our favor assuming Coach Beilein is back and we make another deep run with Matthews back in the fold: I know there was some concern that national outlets weren’t necessarily confirming my report/piece on Jaden with respect to Michigan being a legit option. Well he did an interview with Rivals over the weekend and what I’ve known for a while is now making its way to the mainstream outlets. https://basketballrecruiting.rivals.com/news/usa-basketball-jaden-mcdan…

Matt EM

June 4th, 2018 at 10:43 AM ^

with the caveat that all else is equal.......but often that’s not the case. I’m going with the guy that is athletic and can absorb contact regardless of an extra 2 inches on his arms. Also I do think head height matters. In the context of taking jumpshots, it’s extremely difficult to knock down shots if you cannot see because a defender’s hand is still in your face even when elevating. All that said, Carton is athletic and can absorb contact at the college level in terms of finishing. I think he may be hindered a bit as a jumpshooter off the bounce though if he can’t get good separation.

4roses

June 4th, 2018 at 11:11 AM ^

Not trying to be a jerk here . . . but I believe that you are either missing the argument Ypsituckyboy is trying to make or you forgot what you posted. Here are your words:  

 

Carton only measured at 5’10.5 without shoes........and that was my reluctance in granting him a fifth star in my rankings.

 

You specifically wrote that height is the reason for not giving him a fifth star. Ypsi is pointing out that height should not matter as much as wingspan. What you followed up with - while perfectly valid - has nothing to do with height / wingspan. So either your reluctance to give a fifth star has more to it than just height, or you need to address the height / wingspan argument.  

 

 

Matt EM

June 4th, 2018 at 11:16 AM ^

I further clarified, that for me, height does indeed matter irrelevant of wingspan based on ability to get off clean jumpshots, in particular for perimeter prospects. And honestly, I just don’t think wingspan matters all that much, at least on the offensive end.

Matt EM

June 4th, 2018 at 10:05 AM ^

in general as it relates to non-shotblockers because I don’t think it functionally helps all that much. I like to use Brandon Ingram as the example, he has ridiculous length but is a sub-par finisher. The reason being he can’t finish on the way down/absorb contact and still maintain elevation irrelevant of that wingspan. For shotblockers the length allows them to functionally block shots without jumping all that high because they’re at a disadvantage that way because they are reacting to a shot as opposed to jumping simultaneously.