crg

March 7th, 2018 at 11:25 AM ^

Scotty is right though - I do not know of any teachers that expect to make good money, and most know they will be underpaid compared to other professions they could have chosen. I just think it is a saddening reflection of our culture that their work (which has such a profound effect on so many people) is valued so low monetarily in comparison to others (very much for public school and inner city charters, not as much so for selective private schools or university level).

MichiganTeacher

March 7th, 2018 at 12:42 PM ^

It all depends on your definition of 'good money,' of course. Certainly for a lot of teachers, we know that we could be making a lot more money in another field. But actually there are a fair number of teachers and communities who consider the job to be good money.

When I first came to upstate NY and I was talking with my students about jobs that pay well, I listed investment banker, surgeon, etc. and my students interjected "TEACHER!" I said "Yeah right," as if they were joking, and continued on with my list - and then I realized they weren't joking. This was in a small, rural, depressed (>50% reduced or free lunch) school community. To them, teacher really was a high-paying job.

Also about public vs private schools. The most lucrative teaching jobs are top-end public school ones, not private schools. For example, consider the Chappaqua school district here in NY. You can find the data here: http://seethroughny.net/teacher_pay The most senior teachers in Chappaqua are making about $150k. 

Now, that is about what I'd be making if I had stayed in the NYC independent (private) schools, but only because I was at a top school, also held an administrative role, and beyond that, despite what some on this board will tell you, I am a damn fine teacher. Most in the independent schools earn far less. At my small upstate rural job, I earn way way less than I would somewhere else - but the best-paying teaching jobs are undoubtedly the fancy public schools.

And not just for the salary. The biggest reason that the top-end public schools are financially better than the top-end private schools is the benefits. At the independent schools, teachers have to contribute to retirement plans (usually a 403b 5%/5% match), and the health insurance is expensive and mediocre at best. But at almost all public schools, at least in NY, the health insurance is ridiculously good. My policy is about a $25k policy that I get for "free" with no contributions, and in Buffalo, for example, at least as of a couple years ago, public school teachers had a rider for elective plastic surgery, and no, I am not making that up. And the retirement plans at public schools, at least in NY, are good (for the relatively small amounts of money that teachers make). The state has been gradually scaling back benefits - different 'tiers' for the retirement plan depend on when you started teaching - but at my tier, I had to contribute 2% of my salary for the first 5 years of teaching - and then when I retire, I get health insurance and a pension equal to 1.67*(number of years teaching to a max. of 30)*(final year's salary)/100. Small absolute numbers, but if you consider those numbers good to begin with, as many up here do, then the benefits are pretty good.

All of which is somewhat immaterial to me, as my amazing wife's income dwarfs my own. But hey, I had a lunch period and felt like providing that info, so there you go. :)

SalvatoreQuattro

March 7th, 2018 at 12:11 PM ^

There are a lot more teachers than performance directors. Secondly, this guy is being paid directly from funds the university generates. Thirdly, professors make six figures significantly more than grade school teachers. Do you have an issue with that?

crg

March 7th, 2018 at 1:26 PM ^

You are misdirecting my comment. 1) More teachers than performance directors. Very true, but also there is much greater demand for teachers (nationally) than performance directors. 2) University pays the director. So what? I never made any claims about where salaries should originate; I referenced teachers in both private (corporate owned, parochial, etc.) and public institutions. 3) Professors make 6 figures. Some do, some don't - really depends on where they are, what they teach, and if the bring in extra revenue to the school (via research grants, patents, corporate partnerships, etc.) at which point they are more of a researcher/contractor than an educator. If you were to look at the salaries of pure lecturers (the ones who teach the massive numbers of students), they get paid much less. Also, my last comment clearly stated that the pay disparity is not so pronounced in universities and some of the better private schools as elsewhere. But, to your question, I do have problems with they way some occupations are paid with respect to what meaningful contribution they make to society (not with respect to market value). I'm not advocating any kind of government control or other actions - merely an observation and opinion.

taut

March 7th, 2018 at 2:52 PM ^

Grade school teachers in Detroit, for example, start at $36K, not $20K - $30K. Still not a lot, but for a 21 y/o, not that far off from what their non-teacher peers make.

Nationally, graduating Humanities, Social Science and Communications grads on average earn about $10K more per year, or $46K. But they also typically only get 2 weeks of vacation and about 10-12 paid holidays per year, so they're working about 48 weeks per year.

Teachers in my school district get about 5 weeks off during the school year for vacation and holidays, and another 11 weeks for summer vacation for a total of 16 weeks off work per year. So they're working about 36 weeks per year.

Looking at what recent grads make per week of work, teachers make about $36K for 36 weeks of work, and other liberal arts majors make about $46K for 48 weeks of work. 

It doesn't seem like teacher starting salaries are that out of whack with other liberal arts grads. The "underpaid teacher" meme seems pretty played out. In fact, in my not-wealthy suburban Detroit school district, the average teacher made $81K per year last year. It's dropped to $77K this year due to retirements of older teachers, but $77K for 36 work weeks isn't that bad.

trueblueintexas

March 7th, 2018 at 3:45 PM ^

I was married to a school teacher and have many family members and friends who are school teachers.  I can say without a doubt, teachers do not get 5 weeks off during the school year and an additional 11 weeks over the summer. Just because the kids are not in school, does not mean the teachers are not working. Those days are long gone.

Actual time off for a teacher is closer to @ 3 weeks during the school year and 5 weeks in the summer. Any teacher will kick you in your knee if you try to argue they are watching TV and eating bon-bons for 16 weeks of the year.

taut

March 8th, 2018 at 12:18 AM ^

No, no, and no. I didn't pull those numbers out of my ass. I talked to my teacher friends and consulted our district's calendar and they acknowledge the numbers are right.

Your numbers are silly. Many schools in our district are closed during breaks and during the summer, they couldn't work the six weeks you claim they work in the summer if they wanted to. My teacher neighbor spent July and August in Europe, he wasn't doing lesson plans. Enough of the teacher as overworked, underpaid hero theme, it's not accurate.

trueblueintexas

March 8th, 2018 at 10:23 AM ^

Welp, I guess I have to do this.

You are a gleaming example of what is wrong with our culture. 

I disputed your claim and your response is "no, no, and no", "the numbers didn't come out of my ass" and "your numbers are silly".

So, in the time between the OP post 9:30 AM and your post 2:52PM you decided this was an important enough topic that you crowd sourced data from your friends, aggregated it, pulled up the district calendar and came to the conclusion teachers don't work @ 4 months out of the year. 

Did you ask your teacher friends about time spent on continuing education and earning credits? Grading papers? Team & district meetings? Attending school events?

There is a lot more to teaching than simply class room time and lesson planning and most of it is not done in the school. 

I generally don't agree with trying to turn any profession into a martyrdom. I also know we do not properly fund and support public education well enough in a significant portion of our country. 

You claim my numbers are silly. The truth is, you have no idea. You only know your data point. It doesn't make you right and me wrong, or vice versa. There are very few absolutes in the world. 

You are free to have your opinion supported by whatever evidence you choose to believe. It does not make everyone else who disagrees with you wrong.

taut

March 8th, 2018 at 7:18 PM ^

Hmmmm, so I'm a gleaming example of what's wrong with our culture? Because I have a different opinion, one that you ASSUME was formulated in a few hours? Why would you make such an assumption? I've been concerned about our K-12 system, and have been paying attention, reading, talking to teachers, administrators and parents, and forming my opinions and conclusions for at least 15 years [so warning, this will be long]. But you want to assume I don't know what I'm talking about so that it's easier to dismiss my statements that conflict with your presuppositions. Maybe that approach that you've opted to employ is one of today's problems.

In your attempt to counter my numbers you go for the old trope about how much teachers have to work outside the classroom, as if people don't know that teachers, like most salaried white-collar professionals, take work home, work outside "normal" work hours, and keep up with their field of work on their own time via professional development opportunities. Who doesn't do that? Yet when teachers do it we're expected to be amazed at their sacrifice and ability to work beyond 7 hours per day.

Continuing education and earning credits? Common in many professions. Teachers have summers off during which they can opt to take specially tailored teaching master's degree programs to get their automatic pay bump. They're not required or rewarded to go to a rigorous program, they just need the Master's diploma from Davenport or Baker or such. On the other hand, many other professionals have to choose between going at night after work for years (like my dad did for his UM MSEE degree), or quitting work and going full-time at significant cost (like I did for two years for my MBA).

Grading papers? Team and district meetings? School events? Is that really any different than other professionals who have to answer emails early mornings or late evenings and on weekends, be on Asian conference calls that start at midnight, or fly out on Sundays or return Saturdays from far away business trips? Or work portions of vacations?

The common theme here is what you said you generally didn't want to ascribe to any profession -- a sense of martyrdom. Things that are commonplace in private industry are considered "above and beyond" in teaching. Perhaps it's because so many teachers are married to to other teachers, or come from teaching families, that they don't have that much exposure to what professional corporate salaried employees or entrepreneurs do regularly. Seems wierd to me, but this isn't the first time I've heard people act as if the time teachers work outside the classroom is somehow outside the norm for others.

This disconnect from greater society extends to things like historically how little teachers paid toward premiums, co-pays, deductibles, office visit charges and prescriptions compared to private industry. K-12 administrators and educators still, for no good reason other than bargaining power, have defined-benefit pension plans and retiree health coverage that has proven way too expensive for private industry to sustain. Even some governmental subunits like Oakland County have moved away defined-benefit pensions and toward defined contributions plans (403b, aka 401k).

And who else gets to retire at age 51, after 30 years of work, and collect their pension for perhaps more years than they worked, and utilize pre-Medicare health insurance for a decade and a half? If you bemoan the "lack of funding" for K-12, the enormous cost of their archaic legacy benefit programs are a key culprit. Haven't you read how increases in per-pupil funding typically get swallowed up by employee comp and benefits, even as class sizes increase to contractual maxes?

Education is vitally important. That doesn't mean whatever is being done now is being done right. Yet the attitude from administrators and teachers seems to be a self-reinforcing, self-congratulatory one of dare I say it, martyrdom. Highly skilled and educated professionals forced to do heroic things for minimal compensation. What howeever did I just read about Michigan's 3rd Grade reading proficiency scores slipping from 50% to 44%, the worst of any states using that test? And Brookings analysis last year found Michigan students made the least progress of any state in NAEP scores since 2003.

Yet NEA data on teacher salaries ranks Michigan at 11th highest nationally. More importantly, adjusted for cost of living, we rank 1st in the nation! Highest pay and worst performance make odd bedfellows.

It's been this way for years, yet we're continally subjected to complaints from self-interested parties that teachers in Michigan are underpaid and schools are underfunded. Simply not factual.

And while I hesitate to bring this up because it can be taken with the wrong intent, the average teacher is not someone that was a top achiever academically. While education is very important and we should be recruiting excellent teachers, the incumbent teacher cohort is not cream skimmed from the top.

 

Research over the years has indicated that education majors, who enter college with the lowest average SAT scores, leave with the highest grades. Some of academic evidence documenting easy A's for future teachers goes back more than 50 years!
The latest damning report on the ease of majoring in education comes from research at the University of Missouri, my alma mater. The study, conducted by economist Cory Koedel shows that education majors receive "substantially higher" grades than students in every other department.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/heres-the-nations-easiest-college-major/

So, perhaps it's not surprising that within the K-12 establishment, there's a self-reinforcing belief that for lack of a better description, "We're damn good". College students with the lowest average SATs major in Education, get wildly inflated grades, 

Koedel examined the grades earned by undergraduates during the 2007-2008 school year at three large state universities that include sizable education programs -- University of Missouri, Miami (OH) University and Indiana University. The researcher compared the grades earned by education majors with the grades earned by students in 12 other majors including biology, economics, English, history, philosophy, mathematics, chemistry, psychology and sociology.
Education majors enjoyed grade point averages that were .5 to .8 grade points higher than students in the other college majors. At the University of Missouri, for instance, the average education major has a 3.80 GPA versus 2.99 GPA (science, math, econ majors), 3.12 GPA (social science majors) and 3.16 GPA (humanities majors).

and understandably leave college thinking that they're hot shit. Entering the self-reinforcing "we're underappreciated and underpaid" bubble where they work for the next 30-40 years, it's not surprising that there's such a disconnect between how parents of school-aged children view K-12 teacher quality and how the K-12 establishment considers itself. 

Now, I'm not even going to get into the difficulty in getting rid of underperforming teachers or the frustrating "dance of the lemons" where a bad teacher gets foisted off on some poor unsuspecting parents at another school. That this practice continues to this day in my local school district deserves entirely separate treatment.

TrueblueinTexas, I don't expect you to agree, but next time you encounter opinions contrary to your own don't be so rash in your condesending dismissal of them.

pdgoblue25

March 7th, 2018 at 12:37 PM ^

Who cares what time of the day you drink, it only matters if you drink too much.

My favorite thing to do on a Saturday morning when I have nowhere to be is crack a beer, but if I get bombed at 9pm that's more acceptable?

When I was in Belfast the Europa hotel breakfast buffet had a bottle of self serve Bushmills to pour on the porridge.

Mitch Cumstein

March 7th, 2018 at 9:40 AM ^

Drinking and driving is always dumb, but it’s especially dumb in ann arobor where there are so many other options for getting from point A to point B while intoxicated.

Perkis-Size Me

March 7th, 2018 at 9:48 AM ^

Drunk driving is a big enough problem as it is. But if you’re drunk and getting behind the wheel of a car and take not even noon yet, that’s an even bigger problem.

Hope he gets his shit together.

FauxMo

March 7th, 2018 at 9:58 AM ^

The headline is great. "SECOND DUI IN THE PAST THREE YEARS!!!" That's, like, not many at all, based on the total number of staffers in and around the football program. And didn't the other guy that got arrested for DUI leave the program already, too? 

To put it in context for any Sparty trolls reading this, UM football has half as many staffers arrested for DUI over the past three years as MSU has football players arrested for rape over the same period. 

Mitch Cumstein

March 7th, 2018 at 10:03 AM ^

I don’t disagree with the overall point, but we shouldn’t use MSU as the standard of comparison for the conduct of our team, coaches and staff. Also, isn’t that precisely the same argument that Sparty uses on sexual assault? Only 17 instances, that’s not that many considering how many players come through the program. It’s not a good thing to have leaders by title behaving not like actual leaders.

bacon

March 7th, 2018 at 10:21 AM ^

With regards to the point about DUIs. An employer can’t stop people from getting their first DUI and shouldn’t be held accountable unless the DUI occurred after a work event. They can control how they respond to the DUI either by reprimand or termination. So having coaches, players who get a DUI is really not a mark against the team unless it’s a repeat offense. 

FauxMo

March 7th, 2018 at 11:35 AM ^

OK, I will agree he should be fired immediately for a first offense, as long as everyone that texts and drives is immediately fired from their job as well, as that activity has been found to be more dangerous than drinking and driving. Agreed? 

 

 

 

FauxMo

March 7th, 2018 at 11:53 AM ^

Ah, OK. So this incredible strictness only applies to UM employees? Think there is any chance your "you are fired for any and all first offenses immediately, misdemeanor or felony" might take a toll on hiring eventually? Yikes. I am no fan of drinking and driving at all, but you seem to be taking things a hint far, no? 

JBE

March 7th, 2018 at 1:14 PM ^

Not just UM employees. If you are a representative of education, especially a public university or school, you should make better choices than the students, be a model, and held accountable if you don't. If you are a lecturer somewhere, for instance, with no public profile or face, and the administration gets information that you DD then you’re probably gone, even if it never shows up in a paper somewhere, which is the right move. Your job has an implicit requirement for professional behavior, or at least not criminal behavior, even in your public sphere personal life.  This dude should definitely be gone.

Blue in PA

March 7th, 2018 at 9:55 AM ^

Obviously he's the 3rd shift performance director, which explains the whole "drunk before noon" thing. 

 Everyone knows 7am is really 5 o'clock for 3rd shifters.

 

ThatTCGuy

March 7th, 2018 at 9:59 AM ^

Considering the fact that he was going on a bender at like 10:00 in the morning, he seems like he has real alcohol issues that I hope he gets help for. With that said, how hard is it to order an Uber?! Come on man!