From the Student Section gives one student's perspective on the #FireBrandon rally, petition

Submitted by SaddestTailgateEver on

Preface: Normally, these write-ups are reserved for post-game analyses on the student experience. Given the events of the last few days, and the amount that the student experience has been front and center, I felt it necessary to speak to some of the points I’ve heard raised about everything going on. I apologize for the length.

The situation regarding the job status of Michigan’s current athletic director has obviously been at the forefront of any news regarding the university. While many, many fellow students I’ve spoken to are upset with the AD for a variety of reasons, and many are supportive of the calls for his resignation, some have voiced concern that the events have been perceived as directed at the players. Some have lamented the vociferous impugnation of the character and motives of the coaching staff. Still others have expressed a desire that students get upset about something that “actually matters”. While I cannot speak for any student on campus besides myself, what follows is my perspective on the matter, which is consistent with the conversations that I have had with other students as well.

  1. I fully support the players. As someone who hasn’t played any form of organized sport since playing baseball in middle school, I have absolutely no appreciation for the amount of work that these athletes put in. I hear stories; I read accounts. But there is no way that I will ever have a good grasp about the sacrifices that these players make day in and day out for the team. But that doesn’t mean that I don’t respect the hell out of them for it. In all my frustrations I have never and will never direct that at a student. I may lament the youthful inexperience. I may lament that players are not always put in the best position to succeed. I may get upset with the occasional poor decision or missed tackle. But my support for these students doesn’t stop. Look at Gardner, a student who sacrificed tremendously (especially physically) for the team in his years so far. Not to mention working to get an M.S.W. in the process. Look at the walk-ons busting their ass to contribute despite not being on scholarship (or not having been on scholarship). Look at Shane Morris, who took a hit that would have any of us calling in from our desk jobs for a week, still wanting to give his all for the team. The list goes on and on but the point is that neither I nor any other student I’ve talked to wants any of this aimed at the players. We’ve tried to time our boos or our frustration such that it was clear in the intent—that we were booing a hit, a time management decision, a personnel decision. We were never booing one of our own players. When Shane Morris remained in the game and when he re-entered a few minutes later, boos erupted from the stadium. To Shane, those may have appeared to be aimed at him. To Shane and to any other players that may have felt as though such booing or frustration were aimed at them, I apologize. Unfortunately, in such a situation, myself and those around me were so stunned by what we were witnessing, so horrified by the prospect that a clearly concussed player was going to remain in the game, so worried for his very safety, that we felt we had to do something and in that moment, booing was nearly all we had. Students around me yelled “Shane it’s not worth it,” they pleaded with staff that couldn’t hear them to acknowledge that Shane was clearly injured, they tried to do something, anything to make someone notice what was going on. But all Shane could hear were the “boos”. And that is a shame. I wish he could have heard the reasoning, could have heard the students yelling for fear of his safety. I wish he could have seen in that moment that booing was one of the only ways left to convey our support of him and more importantly, his safety. I wish Shane and all the other injured players a speedy recovery, and I wish the players nothing but success. I at least am behind you, and I know many others are as well.
  2. I do not, for a second, believe that Brady Hoke intentionally endangered one of his players. Hoke may not be the best coach that Michigan has ever had. He may have a hard time getting wins on the road. He may not be great at developing talent given to him. He may be a lot of things. “Malicious” is not one of them. From everything I’ve seen from former players, from people that have met him, from everything I’ve read, Hoke is a great person, a great mentor, and a coach that loves all of his players and wants to get the best for them. And that “best” certainly does not include subjecting them to potentially life-threatening injury. I believe that Hoke did not know that Shane was as bad off as he was, was depending on staff to make him aware of the status changes of his players, and made a decision with the woefully limited information that he had available. That does not make him evil. At the same time, however, it does not absolve him of responsibility. As the coach he is responsible for what transpires on the sideline. He is responsible for making sure that there are personnel monitoring what they should be monitoring and is ultimately responsible for the safety and wellbeing of his players. I agree with Hoke when he said that attacking his character or his integrity was unwarranted; but I still think that he should not remain head coach. I honestly feel bad for him. He loves his players; he loves the school; he’s pushed the players to be good people as well as good players; he’s been put in a no-win situation by the AD and left to twist in the wind; but he has demonstrated that he is not up to the task of leading the team, especially in the moments where it is most necessary, and a player’s health was jeopardized as a result.
  3. Yes, this is about the concussion. No, it is not *only* about the concussion. Ire at Brandon and the athletic department has been building for years. If you ask any signatory on the petition why they signed it they’ll likely have a different story than the others. The common theme will be a tone-deaf department that has finally gone off the rails. Are we upset about the losses? Of course we are. Would we be signing a petition and protesting in front of the President’s house if we were 2-3, things looked bleak for the season, but the AD was not actively alienating students and apparently trying to massage the press release regarding leaving a concussed player in the game? I was here in 2008, and while, as a freshman, I wasn’t as clued in to the events on campus as I am now, I’m pretty confident the answer is “no”. Win or lose the students’ frustration with the AD has been building for years. The tinder was set, and mishandling a concussion, and then subsequently mishandling the mishandling of the concussion, was all the spark needed to set the whole thing ablaze.
  4. This does actually matter. Is it ultimately as important as situations in Ferguson? As the situation in the Middle East? As so many other big issues in the world today? No, it isn’t. The difference is immediacy. Can the students here protest and change anything in Ferguson? Probably not. Can they stop ISIS? No. But they damn well can raise enough hell that someone takes notice of problems here—problems that students can directly see and feel. Should students be getting upset about other things as well? Absolutely. But I’m not about to be dismissive of them standing up on the right side of an issue just because they aren’t standing up for something else.

To end, let me say that, as a student, I simply cannot stay away from any of the home games I’ve already purchased tickets to. Depending on scheduling I may even go to Evanston to see the team. I need to support the team. I need to support the players. Hell, with all that’s going on—and I still believe that change is necessary—the coaches could probably use a little support, too. What I will not do, however, is support what this department has become. I will not support Dave Brandon. I hope that that distinction is clear.

Comments

SFBlue

October 1st, 2014 at 1:17 AM ^

I am just thrilled to see student activism, of any type.  You guys definitely moved the needle here with the rally.

You should by all means go to every game, especially as students, because you only have so many, and I am sure you've been told this many times, but it's true: it's special.   

Vasav

October 1st, 2014 at 2:05 AM ^

I especially love how you address the "this matters" portion. It matters because it is a cultural event dating back to 1879. It matters because we care.

triguy616

October 1st, 2014 at 8:49 AM ^

People that use that kind of reasoning are people that don't really care about what's going on around them and would rather make Facebook statuses about ISIS. Blanket statement caveat applies, but I think you'll find it's generally true.

bluebyyou

October 1st, 2014 at 7:06 AM ^

The students could really make Brandon's life miserable if they chose to do so by simply not buying tickets next year if Brandon is still the AD.  That would leave about a 15K+ hole in their section of the stadium that will not be filled if this year's ticket sales are any indication.

Create a petition of current freshman, sophs and juniors indicating your intent not to buy tickets next year if Brandon isn't removed and present it to Schlissel and the regents.

Hopefully, the threat will be all that is needed.

Tuebor

October 1st, 2014 at 9:50 AM ^

That could be exactly what Brandon wants.  He is forced to sell tickets at a steep discount to students so with MSU and OSU on the schedule he could probably sell those at regular price to the general public and be happy.  It would be quite a statement though.

kehnonymous

October 1st, 2014 at 10:02 AM ^

Nah, brandon would probably just force in Domino's Pizza interns at gunpoint to fill in the empty seats.

Seriously though, even if you're one of the thousands of Michigan students who doesn't give two craps about football and wouldn't be going to a game anyways** this still affects you. If the football team goes 12-0 or 0-12 that has nearly zero bearing on your cultural anthropology thesis and prospects for future employment in that field.  But the way these assclowns have dragged our university's name throught the mud over the last 72 hours?  That does affect you, even if only intangibly.  Because a Michigan degree carries some weight with it whether you like it or not, and I'd rather that we be known for being a top-notch university than for having a Pyongyang-esque disconnect with reality.

** - which by defintion means you're not reading this, but that's cool

Ducky Bump

October 1st, 2014 at 10:45 AM ^

I have watched several local and national news reports about the protest.  All focus on two things:

1.  The fact that we are 2-3.

2.  The concussion and the way it was handled. 

While I agree that it is hard to imagine how the athletic department could have handled this worse, for most of us, that was just the straw that broke the camel's back.

 

Wado

October 1st, 2014 at 11:05 AM ^

I agree wholeheartedly. Point #3 is especially significant to me because of the way people have been trying to argue that this is just about losses, and that very serious personal harm to one of the players is being misused on a "witch hunt". Thank you for expressing this so well.

ribby

October 2nd, 2014 at 8:42 AM ^

On point 2, I don't think Hoke is explicitly malicious, he isn't punching kids in the mouth, or sending them out to get hurt, but I think in his value system, old school toughness outweighs regard for player safety. I would say that he follows the letter of the new rules, but Saturday that did not happen.

I think that is related to the 2-3 record, I think we see a remarkable lack of player development, and that can only be attributed to incompetence. I think that reinforces people's view that the same incompetence means adequate player safety procedures were not implemented, there is no reason to attribute them to a specific plan not to implement them or to subvert them.

With regard to player safety, change needs to happen much faster than the changein play on the field over the last 18 months, so it is understandable why people think Hoke and Brandon are not the ones to do it. As a corollary, if Hoke is fired mid season, Nuss is more likely than Mattison to become interim precisely because he is less associated with the program.