Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (45)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 8 hours ago
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 23 hours ago
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 3 days ago
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 5 days ago
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 6 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 1,513 views
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 756 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 580 views
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 489 views
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 485 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 51 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 16 comments
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 15 comments
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 13 comments
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 9 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    43 replies
  • OT: Real Estate / Renting / Land Contract gurus
    24 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    88 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    201 replies
  • OT: Guy pretends to be All American for Ohio...gets busted
    38 replies
  • Trey Burke Combine Measurements & Comparable Players
    27 replies
  • Shane Morris signed pylon on ebay
    45 replies
  • OT - Kickstarter opportunity to create new college football video game
    42 replies
  • OT: Georgia Tech is Also Bad at Photoshop
    27 replies
  • Updated Rivals100
    38 replies
  • 5-Star DT Andrew Brown Planning Visit
    70 replies
  • OT- Miguel (not that Miguel) kicks fan in head at Billboard Music Awards
    56 replies
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    3 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • OT: Game of Thrones
    57 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    43 replies
  • OT: Real Estate / Renting / Land Contract gurus
    24 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    88 replies
  • OT- Miguel (not that Miguel) kicks fan in head at Billboard Music Awards
    56 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    201 replies
  • OT: Guy pretends to be All American for Ohio...gets busted
    38 replies
  • 5-Star DT Andrew Brown Planning Visit
    70 replies
  • Shane Morris signed pylon on ebay
    45 replies
  • Question about M receiving great Jim Smith
    36 replies
  • Trey Burke Combine Measurements & Comparable Players
    27 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • Updated Rivals100
    38 replies
  • OT: Georgia Tech is Also Bad at Photoshop
    27 replies
  • OT - Kickstarter opportunity to create new college football video game
    42 replies
  • Rajin Cajuns Invade AA for some Red Hot Softball (EDIT: Fri 2pm & Sat Noon)
    30 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    201 replies
  • Jabrill Peppers Announcement Date Set
    169 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Notre Dame's Nix fires back at Coach Hoke
    110 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • Sparty losing recruits to the rap game
    95 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    88 replies
  • PSU about to get blasted again by SI investigative report
    88 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  • OT: Advice on moving to Ann Arbor
    72 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • The B1G List: Ranking the State Fossils of the Big Ten

    This list is completely arbitrary and not a genuine analysis of the relative merits of state fossils.

    0 comments
  • Trey Burke turns to inner circle to prepare for NBA draft

    will be michigan's highest pick in a while

    2 comments
  • B1G assistant coach salaries on the rise

    money has to go somewhere

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. is motivated by his critics and doubters, and supremely confident in his ability

    I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.

    0 comments
  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    1 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  • Michigan's rising recruiting profile exciting John Beilein, who remains true to his scouting form

    Their high school coaches and AAU coaches have probably a better appreciation of Michigan than maybe they had before," Beilein said. "It's a tough balance right now. Tim Hardaway and Trey Burke weren't really high-profile players, nor was Darius Morris, and all were high-profile players. "We're still looking at 'who is the best fit.' "

    0 comments
  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  • Why does the NFL make for such bad media?

    robots

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Spring Game Extrapolations: Offense

  • View
  • Revisions
By Brian — April 12th, 2011 at 3:23 PM — 133 comments
Filed under:
  • al borges denard fusion cuisine
  • denard robinson
  • fitzgerald toussaint
  • michael shaw
  • mike cox
  • mooseback
  • offense
  • power off tackle
  • roy roundtree
  • spring game
  • stephen hopkins
  • vincent smith

Nothing will ever bring home how bizarrely intense people get about spring football than Orson's annual in-depth review of Florida's spring game. It's the closest he gets to being a conventional team blogger, a straightforward piece of analysis long enough to be a Marky Mark Mangino post livened up by Orson's tendency to call things a "boiled bag of rat innards". Orson is writing about defensive tackles. It is April and college football is bored.

Michigan's got one of those this weekend and these are the things I'll be extrapolating answers from the tiniest filaments of evidence about:

Is Can Have Tailback

 stephen-hopkins-2 lovemoose

Michigan's tailback last year was Denard Robinson and when it wasn't Denard Robinson it was people being enraged that Vincent Smith wasn't really fast or falling down past the line of scrimmage. This year some variety of pro-style offense will be deployed; having a tailback becomes significantly less optional.

Your candidates:

  • Vincent Smith, the 5'6" Pahokeean who was the leading non-Robinson rusher last year with 601 yards. He took 136 carries to get those—4.4 per—and struggled badly against anything approximating a good defense.
  • Michael Shaw. Carlos Brown 2.0 averaged a full yard per carry more than Smith mostly because he got hurt after the Bowling Green game.
  • Michael Cox. The Loch Ness Monster is reputed to be a stallion of a man capable of great feats. Unfortunately he is 50-50 to run towards the correct endzone on any given play.
  • Stephen Hopkins. Hopkins had some fumbling issues and only ended up with 37 carries last year but his size made him an effective lead blocker for Robinson and his rushes promised a Minor-like downhill moose down the road. We're a bit further down the road and Hopkins's new head coach loves him some moose.
  • Fitzgerald Toussaint. Toussaint has been vaporware in his first two years. Maybe he can stay healthy for the next twenty seconds.

There is also The Greatest Player In The History Of The World According To Two Jacksons. Thomas Rawls enters with the sort of hype you can only get by being a generic late-rising three star coached by Fred Jackson's son and recruited by Fred Jackson. Since he didn't enroll early we won't get to test the Jacksons' theory that Thomas Rawls encompasses the power of the sun and gently warms the earth each morning.

Looking for: A somewhat lighter, faster Hopkins with a grasp of what he should do. He's probably going to be the best back on the roster and he's now in a system that loves/needs a guy like him.

Fearing: Vincent Smith looks pretty much the same and still has a lock on the top TB spot. It's plausible that Smith's injury lingered into last season—remember he tore that ACL during the OSU game, so he had well under a year to get ready—and that he'll display a lot more speed and agility two years removed from it. If that's the case then maybe he can be a decent Big Ten starter. If he's still the same guy he was last year and he's still at the top of the depth chart and he's getting a lot of carries from the I when Denard could be doing something, guh.

Will only believe three games into the season: Cox as Herschel Walker. That guy is never going to play. He's a redshirt junior and couldn't get a carry last year even when half the tailback corps was injured and the rest was Smith and freshman Hopkins. And this is at tailback, the position where you can leap into the starting lineup on day one if, say, you're a human battering ram who runs like a gazelle. The only RB in recent Michigan history to get noticeably better late in his career was Chris Perry. Everyone else was the same guy they always were.

The Roundtree Question

What do you do with the Big Ten's second leading receiver when his production was predicated on the threat of Denard Robinson running and his position only sort of exists in the platonic ideal of a MANBALL offense?

The answer to this is probably "nothing." Borges said something about running a ton of three and four wide this season. Even if that's forced it sounds like Borges is going to roll with it, especially because his best wideout seems most comfortable in the slot—kinda need to have three WRs to have a slot—and the tight ends are sparse and stone-handed. Late-era Carr teams based out of three wide even after Steve Breaston had moved on to the NFL. Borges is more of a bomber than Carrbord and just spent a couple years running one of those "West Coast" offenses that throws damn near everything out there. So… yeah, expect three wideouts.

Okay, then, but the further question is: what will Borges do with the guy? Roundtree went nuts last year when the threat of Denard Robinson sucked safeties up and saw him stunningly wide open against Notre Dame and Indiana and Illinois and several other times besides. Can Borges run what he wants to run and surround Roundtree with nothing but grass?

Looking for: Michigan safeties to fail spectacularly because they can't decide whether to take Denard or stay back. If you can't do it to Michigan safeties you can't do it to anyone.

Fearing: Borges can't evolve the system to keep ahead of defenses and get those almost free touchdowns. I'm sure he can emulate QB Lead Oh Noes but Michigan had to keep re-arranging it to prevent safeties from showing up in the wrong place at the critical moment. Borges is a smart guy but his knowledge is in another arena. I'm not sure he'll be able to create as many opportunities with Denard's legs.

Will only believe three games into the season: Jeremy Gallon on the field.

Okay, You Run Power, But How?

powpuff1

Michigan ran POWER last year. They didn't run it much, but they did use it as a counter to the constant stretch action. It was fairly successful as a changeup. That move was part of the shift in Michigan's offense away from a true zone read to an odd QB-as-TB thing people called "QB iso" and didn't know what to do with—the AP put him on their All-America team as a "back." Like Rodriguez coming into DeBord's already extant stretch offense, Hoke is walking into a situation where his guys have some clue about what the new stuff is.

Unfortunately, we've seen bits and pieces of power plays run from under center in the practice videos that have invariably been stuffed. This is rock hard evidence it is not a good idea. So, like, what I'm saying is that if you've got Denard Robinson and you want to run power you might as well line up in the shotgun and run it with Denard Robinson, right?

A secondary question: how serious is Hoke about his distaste for zone running? He seems like a pretty hands-off guy when it comes to the offense, but if there's one thing he's stressed on that side of the ball it's that the team "will run power" and fullbacks will have their spine compressed and whatnot. This is something of a problem because Michigan has just completed the transition away from hampeople. Mike DeBord installed a zone stretch running game in 2006 and Michigan started recruiting to it. That first class was David Molk and Mark Huyge, now redshirt seniors.

Everyone recruited since has been either a relatively light and mobile spread OL or a prototypical left tackle. The prototype will be fine in any system; guys like Molk and Omameh and Ricky Barnum might not be. If Michigan spends the offseason putting beef on the interior line it might work out… or it might give them a bunch of tweeners not particularly good at anything.

Looking for: QB power.

Fearing: RB power.

Will only believe three games into the season: Michigan guards as effective drive blockers.

Lamarckian Denard

 Denard_PacmanGame_medium

EVOLLLLLLLLLVE

It was at last year's spring game that Robinson went from a freak show who should be moved to tailback to a freak show who should be in the Heisman running. He can't improve that much again without melting anyone who watches him, Ark of the Covenant style, but he was still pretty raw last year. He had bouts of drive- and game-crippling inaccuracy; he occasionally joined the Rex Grossman "f*** it, I'm going deep" club; he was restricted to a set of limited routes that teams adapted to as the leaves turned. He should progress. How much?

Looking for: Incremental improvement.

Fearing: Uncomfortable on drops and still prone to chucking slants well behind his receivers.

Will only believe three games into the season: hopefully that Denard Robinson can do anything.

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
April 12th, 2011 at 3:33 PM | I wouldn't be surprised to (Score:1)
Hannibal.
Hannibal.'s picture
Joined: 09/09/2008
MGoPoints: 2497

I wouldn't be surprised to see Cox play.  The vibes around him suggest that he didn't play because he had a Rodriguez Dog House issue.  That could change with a new coach.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 3:45 PM | I thought the issue with Cox (Score:1)
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 5825

I thought the issue with Cox wasn't so much a dog-house thing, but a learning-his-assignments thing. I thought word out of practice was that he has massive amounts of physical ability, but has trouble with things like picking up blocks and learning the playbook.

If that was in fact the issue, a change in coaching staff/style might actually shake out with him stepping up. If it was an issue of mismatched teaching and learning styles before, he could turn it around, RS Junior or not.

I am this close to going all Dark Blue in here.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 3:46 PM | If I remember corrctly he was (Score:1)
GBOD79
GBOD79's picture
Joined: 07/14/2009
MGoPoints: 3005

If I remember corrctly he was in the dog house because he could not learn the plays. That speaks to a mental issue and not a specific issue with a coach.

Those who stay will be champions!

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 3:54 PM | It might be both.  Rodriguez (Score:1)
Hannibal.
Hannibal.'s picture
Joined: 09/09/2008
MGoPoints: 2497

It might be both.  Rodriguez alienated a lot of players, and his judgement when it came to personnel selection was highly questionable.
 

Anyhow, it is possible for a new coach to fix mental errors, and I think that Cox is the best pure ball carreir of the bunch.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 3:58 PM | also, (Score:1)
matty blue
matty blue's picture
Joined: 08/01/2008
MGoPoints: 377

didn't the spread n shred require some reads by tailbacks, as opposed to the "you.  go there." manball stuff we're moving towards?

if he couldn't make the reads, he wasn't going to play.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 4:23 PM | No, the spread is actually (Score:1)
Marshmallow
Marshmallow's picture
Joined: 11/08/2009
MGoPoints: -114

No, the spread is actually easier for RBs than the pro-style.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 5:58 PM | I wouldn't say that.  In the (Score:1)
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 28963

I wouldn't say that.  In the RR offense, tailbacks have to serve as lead blockers for the QB.  That's a major added responsibility (and likely contributed to their high injury toll).  

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 6:51 PM | True but (Score:1)
funkywolve
Joined: 10/08/2008
MGoPoints: 1947

I'd say in a pro style offense the pass protection schemes for the running backs are a bit more complicated than what they were in RR's offense.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 9:51 PM | Great statement. (Score:1)
DustomaticGXC
DustomaticGXC's picture
Joined: 10/05/2010
MGoPoints: 582

Now give us an example of something specific that is easier in the spread.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 4:22 PM | No, it wasn't both.  It was (Score:1)
Marshmallow
Marshmallow's picture
Joined: 11/08/2009
MGoPoints: -114

No, it wasn't both.  It was definitely that he couldn't pick up the playbook.  This has been reported numerous times.  Nothing else has been reported even once.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 4:28 PM | Personnel selection (Score:1)
FGB
FGB's picture
Joined: 09/24/2009
MGoPoints: 1731

was questionable on defense, with apparently stupid defensive coaches.

There weren't really any questionable personnel selections on offense

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 4:50 PM | Uhh, let's see.  Nick (Score:1)
Hannibal.
Hannibal.'s picture
Joined: 09/09/2008
MGoPoints: 2497

Uhh, let's see.  Nick Sheridan starting over Steven Threet?  Burning Devin Gardner's redshirt to send Forcier a message?  Loading up the roster with legions of 3* skill players?  At least one of Rodrigeuz's former players from WVU is on the record saying that he shows favoritism towards guys that he recruits.  Yes, I would say that Rodriguez exhibited highly questionable judgement with his personnel selection, on offense too.   On top of that, he ran off more players from his program than any coach I have ever seen in my life.  A reasonable person watching Michigan football for the last three years could conclude that if a player wasn't playing, it might not be entirely related to his ability or his attitude. 

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 5:06 PM | I don't know about what a reasonable person (Score:1)
FGB
FGB's picture
Joined: 09/24/2009
MGoPoints: 1731

could conclude, but we're getting a lot of evidence of what an unreasonable person would conclude.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 5:19 PM | Ha! Awesome.* (Score:1)
1329 S. University
1329 S. University's picture
Joined: 01/01/2010
MGoPoints: 467

*

Those Who Stay Will Be Champions

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 5:34 PM | ran off more players from his program than any coach I have ever (Score:1)
Don
Don's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 19201
Oh c'mon... is it really that players left RR that bothers you, or is it that his teams just weren't all that good? Surely you're aware of what happened in 1969? Considerably more players left the team in 1969 than from 2008-2010.
 
"I came in and instituted an extremely rigorous summer training program there had been none and everyone told me it wouldn t work, that people wouldn t go for that in Ann Arbor. The team had a reputation for having good talent, but being soft. I did have some attrition, but the real football players stayed. I was harder on that Michigan team than I ever was on any other group... I killed them. I ran them into the ground."
 
"I was prepared for some attrition when I became Michigan's coach. I can honestly say we did not lose a guy who really could have helped us. I didn't lose any sleep over anyone who quit that spring..."

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 6:07 PM | But we can't do that anymore. (Score:1)
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 28963

But we can't do that anymore.  In 1969 there were literally no scholarship limits, so Bo could go out and bring in 50 freshmen a year if he wanted to.  The coach at Michigan today doesn't have that flexibility. (If we were an SEC school, of course, it might be a different story.)  We could not afford that level of attrition.  If you're a coach today, you've got to convince the guys you inherit to stick around.      

  • Login or register to post comments
April 13th, 2011 at 7:16 AM | We could not afford that level of attrition. (Score:1)
Don
Don's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 19201

The only inherited players that left after RR got here that were a serious loss to us were Boren and Mallett. Given that LC had to persuade Mallett to come back after his freshman year, it's hardly the case that RM was a happy and totally dedicated Wolverine to begin with. After Mustain left Arkansas, it was inevitable that RM was going to transfer to the team he really wanted to play for in the first place. What those who continue to insist that RR "drove off" Mallett can't explain is why Mallett never publicly criticized RR after he left, in comparison to Boren, for example. RM doesn't see to have a problem with talking in other circumstances.

Of RR's recruits, Tate's departure hurt in terms of depth, but he was hardly driven off by RR—he was an academic fuckup. JT Turner's flameout is a mystery, but neither he nor Vlad Emilien could figure out that if they stuck around, they would have gotten playing time, given how bad our secondary has been.

I think the much bigger problem with RR was that he offered scholarships to too many guys who never ended up here to begin with, such as Dorsey. That's attrition, but it's certainly not due to RR "driving people off"—it's due to unwise recruiting decisions.

As Brian and others have long since detailed, it's not as though there weren't significant losses during Carr's last few years, either. We sure could have used Cobrani Mixon the last couple of years; he turned out to be a pretty decent player in Hoke's old conference.


  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 5:26 PM | Minor (Score:1)
Needs
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 4159

The glaring one I can think of was McGuffie/Shaw over Minor in 2008 (and I'm pretty sure that Minor wasn't injured). Nothing else jumps out, though the yoyoing of Hopkins last year was strange. 

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 6:05 PM | No link or anything, but (Score:1)
UMICH1606
Joined: 02/21/2010
MGoPoints: 1861

No link or anything, but Minor was given one of those top secret Stonum-like suspensions to start that particular year.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 4:35 PM | Based upon.....? (Score:1)
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2928

I never understand guys saying "I think so and so is the best __" when the said better guy has barely touched the field, and there is literally nothing other than a couple practice videos and the odd carry against MAC teams to judge his goodness upon. I get that we've HEARD Cox is a great athlete, but that's not quite the same as you know, seeing his work in order to judge him. I'm not saying you're wrong necessarily, it's just where's the evidence? Kinda like your other statement that RR alienated "a lot of players... and his personnel selection was highly questionable." 

"Everyone gets dumped Gabe. Let me give you some advice: a little coverup on your Adams Apple will make it appear smaller. Which will make you appear less like a transvestite." 

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 4:56 PM | Your'e right that it is a (Score:1)
Hannibal.
Hannibal.'s picture
Joined: 09/09/2008
MGoPoints: 2497

Your'e right that it is a limited sample size.  But I'm not guaranteeing that Cox is the starter on day 1.  All I'm saying is that you can't point to him not playing the past couple of years as definitive evidence that he sucks and he's never going to play.  Especially when you factor in how often Rodriguez showed both inflexibility and terrible judgement with both players and coaches during his miserable three years at Michigan.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 5:48 PM | Lewan, Molk, Omameh, (Score:1)
GBOD79
GBOD79's picture
Joined: 07/14/2009
MGoPoints: 3005

Lewan, Molk, Omameh, Schilling, Denard, Roundtree, Odoms, etc have all had good careers and have given plenty to Michigan. You can most assuredly criticize RR for many things but you dont have to make stuff up to do so.

Those who stay will be champions!

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 5:53 PM | I personally think Cox is the (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27442

I personally think Cox is the best RB on the team, but a lot of that is based on the way he moves.  I like the way he cuts, the way he breaks tackles, his balance, etc.  It doesn't necessarily depend on the level of competition, the yards he gains, etc.  The kid flat-out runs hard, and in my opinion, a 6'0", 215 lb. guy with decent skills who runs hard is probably going to be better than a 5'6", 180 lb. guy with decent skills who runs hard.  I will never question Smith's attitude, but his size and skills leave something to be desired.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 9:47 PM | If you are smooth as butter (Score:1)
DustomaticGXC
DustomaticGXC's picture
Joined: 10/05/2010
MGoPoints: 582

and strong as an ox, but you can't remember which play you're running or what your blocking assignment is, you're NOT a better RB than a dependable guy with 1/4 your physical ability.

 

If Cox was the best RB on the team, he would have played more in his career.  Period.  There is more to being the best player than having the physical potential to be the best player.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 9:55 PM | I don't trust Rich Rodriguez (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27442

I don't trust Rich Rodriguez to put the best players on the field, so I'll wait until Cox's career is done, thank you very much.  I have a hard time believing that Smith is the best RB on the team, so something probably has to give.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
April 13th, 2011 at 3:12 AM | You aren't just saying (Score:1)
DustomaticGXC
DustomaticGXC's picture
Joined: 10/05/2010
MGoPoints: 582

you don't trust RR's judgement.  You're saying his judgement is so bad that you trust your evaluation (based on next to nothing) over his evaluation (based on literally years of seeing Cox in practice, face to face).

 

Do you know how ridiculous that sounds?

  • Login or register to post comments
April 13th, 2011 at 6:34 AM | I do not care if (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27442

I do not care if DustomaticGXC thinks it sounds ridiculous.  That's my opinion, whether you like it or not.  Coaches aren't always right, and that particular coach went 15-22 and got very little production from most of his running backs.  He's not above reproach.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
April 13th, 2011 at 10:10 AM | I realize (Score:1)
Hail-Storm
Hail-Storm's picture
Joined: 06/07/2010
MGoPoints: 2382

that you have a lot of experience with players and football overall as a coach, but your argument about size and speed is not always a given fact.  The reason I say this, is some of our best running backs in Michigan history have not been your prototypical large fast guys.  Jamie Morris was a great runner that did not have great size.  Mike Hart is slow and small, yet has some amazing vision, runs low, keeps his legs moving, and I think, has one of the best initial bursts of speed that helped land him number 1 all time in yards.

I also think it's unfair to say 15-22 means RR doesn't understand running back talent. He has had some great running backs elsewhere (Slaton, Devine) and he kept the running backs coach we've had for forever.  I honestly believe that if Cox wasn't playing, it was because he wasn't doing something right. 

This doesn't mean he can't take over, but I am still a little pessimistic of our back situation. Personally I like Shaw and Hopkins.

"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest." -Mark Twain


 

  • Login or register to post comments
April 13th, 2011 at 10:19 AM | No, it's not always a given (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27442

No, it's not always a given fact.  But at big schools, the running back should usually either be big or fast.  Smith is neither.  Cox might not be a blazer, but he is fairly big.

I agree that Cox must have done something that prevented him getting on the field, but that doesn't mean Rodriguez was right in putting Smith out there most of the time.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
April 13th, 2011 at 10:51 AM | I agree (Score:1)
Hail-Storm
Hail-Storm's picture
Joined: 06/07/2010
MGoPoints: 2382

that Smith did not look great last year.  I was very disappointed many times when he went down on little shoelace tackles.  But your assertation that big schools must have big backs goes against my argument about Hart and Morris. I also think that RR showed that he played the best back when he had the chance. I think he would have loved to run Minor for the entire time he was there if it wasn't for injuries. Like I said, he has had a lot of successful years of great backs.

Cox might be good, but I don't rate backs on size and speed alone.  To me, the best backs have little nuances that make them special. Running low to make direct hits hard, quick bursts when the see the hole, hitting the hole, and always keeping your legs moving. These are things that Barry Sanders excelled at, and Mike Hart did well at. 

Just to compare, I think Minor and Carlos Brown were similar sizes, with Brown having better speed.  However, I think Minor had an it factor that made him a better running back that broke tackles and created things on the field. 

Based on the running backs last year, I'm not sure if there is anyone who has it, although like I said, I personally like Hopkins and Shaw at the moment.

"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest." -Mark Twain


 

  • Login or register to post comments
April 13th, 2011 at 11:16 AM | I didn't say that big schools (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27442

I didn't say that big schools MUST have big backs.  I said that's the norm.  And yes, there are exceptions like Hart and Morris.  But the reason you have to point out a back from 2004-2007 and then jump all the way back to the '80's to find another good, small back at Michigan is that they're not all that common.  It's rare that a 5'8" guy is a great running back.  Not impossible, but rare.

Minor was 10-15 lbs. bigger than Brown.

As you said, Smith doesn't really have that "it" factor like Morris and Hart.  He also doesn't have great speed.  And he's tiny.  So he can catch the ball and he's a willing blocker, which are both good qualities.  But I'm not sure they trump the skills that other backs bring/brought to the table.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
April 13th, 2011 at 11:26 AM | Agreed (Score:1)
Hail-Storm
Hail-Storm's picture
Joined: 06/07/2010
MGoPoints: 2382

That not all small backs are good, and that Smith isn't great, but my overall second point is that this does not speak well for Cox.

RR has proven to have played decent backs (Slaton, Devine, Minor).  The fact that last year he put out Smith over Cox, tells me Cox doesn't have it either.  I'm going with Brian here in thinking that hopefully the freshman will be "the guy". I believe that last spring/summer/fall you were high on Touissant until the injury(ies).  I'm guessing the coaching staff was too, and they ended up settling with the other backs. I'm guessing he hasn't regained his explosiveness.

My other point is that I think size can be overated with backs. There is a lot more to a special back vs a servicable back. I want the special back and don't believe Cox is it.

"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest." -Mark Twain


 

  • Login or register to post comments
April 13th, 2011 at 1:29 PM | Rodriguez kept Minor on the (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27442

Rodriguez kept Minor on the bench too much in 2008 and played McGuffie/Shaw instead.  He again put an undersized guy on the field too frequently in 2009 and 2010.

I was/am high on Toussaint.  I still think he'll be good when healthy (well...*if* healthy).

I'm not saying Cox is a special back.  I just want to point that out.  I'm not saying he's a 1st round pick in the making.  I just think he's BETTER than Smith, which is also a title I would give to most of the backs on the roster.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
April 14th, 2011 at 1:16 AM | Something tells me (Score:1)
DustomaticGXC
DustomaticGXC's picture
Joined: 10/05/2010
MGoPoints: 582

you don't think injuries exist.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 13th, 2011 at 10:17 AM | Magnus (Score:1)
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 5142

Magnus I have no problem with your opinion, but this is the wrong school to be dissing running backs because they are small.

Sincerely,

Jamie Morris and Mike Hart

I can here you now in 2004.   Get this Mike Hart off the field.  Give me my Max Martin.    Jerome Jackson is the best RB on the team period get him his touches.

 

 

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
April 13th, 2011 at 11:09 AM | Yes, those are the (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27442

Yes, those are the exceptions.  Just like when people say "Tall quarterbacks are better" and someone says "Nuh-uh because of Drew Brees!"  Mike Hart (small-ish and slow) was a very good running back, but Brandon Minor was big, Chris Perry was big and fast, Anthony Thomas was big and kind of fast, Biakabutuka was big and fast, Wheatley was big and fast, Power was good sized and fast, etc.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
April 13th, 2011 at 5:23 PM | More evidence Mike Cox isn't using his head (Score:1)
robpollard
robpollard's picture
Joined: 06/03/2009
MGoPoints: 597

Hoke at April 13 presser: Mike Cox hasn't practiced as much because he has a class during Tuesday practice time "so that doesn't help him."

After acting like an a** on Twitter (or maybe it was Facebook) after RR left, repeated reports from practice he doesn't know the plays, and now not being smart enoug to schedule his classes at a time other than practice time, I don't have much faith in Mike Cox's maturity and judgment.

It's disappointing, b/c he seems to have some real physical skills and we really need a stud RB, but he looks destined to be a non-contributor.

It only ends once. Anything that happens before that, is just progress.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 13th, 2011 at 5:53 PM | I'm hoping the practice/class (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27442

I'm hoping the practice/class criticism is a joke.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
April 13th, 2011 at 7:13 PM | Typically classes for the (Score:1)
OMG Shirtless
OMG Shirtless's picture
Joined: 08/16/2009
MGoPoints: 1486

Typically classes for the Winter semester are scheduled at the end of the Fall semester.  Richard Jonathon Rodriguez was still the head coach when they would have registered for classes this semester.  Hoke didn't even come in until January when classes were already underway, how on earth were the players supposed to schedule around Hoke's spring practice schedule when he was still the head coach of SDSU?  There are a few slackjaws on Scout that can't get this through their thick skulls and bitch and moan every single time a report says that Marvin Robinson, Mike Cox, etc miss a Tuesday afternoon practice due to class.  Shit happens when you have to schedule your classes without knowing the future practice schedule.  

I put up a tough front, but deep down I just want to be held.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 3:40 PM | Anyone know if the Spring (Score:1)
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 5825

Anyone know if the Spring Game will be streaming on BTN's website? They had an option last year to pay to watch it online, but it's not listed on their schedule of upcoming streaming events.

[Insert obligatory fist-shaking about the Big Ten Footprint.]

I am this close to going all Dark Blue in here.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 4:48 PM | Joining the fist-shaking, with a chorus of silent cries (Score:1)
Michigasling
Michigasling's picture
Joined: 11/21/2009
MGoPoints: 3278

I also note WTKA is broadcasting, but implication is local radio only and not audio-streamed on line for those of us who shake our fists from a distance. 

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 7:23 PM | Isn't their live, online stream (Score:1)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 38778

At their webpage whatever is on the air at the moment?

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 7:34 PM | That's the logical answer, (Score:1)
JDinAK
Joined: 04/11/2011
MGoPoints: 15

That's the logical answer, but I'm not sure that's the real answer.  Sometimes when I go to the website in the morning they're clearly rebroadcasting something from the night before (which I can tell because references to times and dates are off).

Also, the page was just loading for forever during Saturday night's NC hockey game, so perhaps expect similar slow/not working performance during the spring game.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 4:50 PM | I'm also curious about the (Score:1)
MAgoBLUE
MAgoBLUE's picture
Joined: 05/21/2010
MGoPoints: 2159

I'm also curious about the streaming video.  I'd rather not have to go to a bar at noon on Saturday but I will.

 

 

"fumbles the snap, takes off. . ."

(9/5/09)

Twitter

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 5:11 PM | I emailed BTN to ask if it (Score:1)
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 5825

I emailed BTN to ask if it will be available. They have other spring games listed on the schedule, just not Michigan's, so hopefully it was just an oversight. I'll let everyone know when/if I hear back.

I am this close to going all Dark Blue in here.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 6:00 PM | I am fairly positive that BTN (Score:1)
UMICH1606
Joined: 02/21/2010
MGoPoints: 1861

I am fairly positive that BTN is having a live telecast if that helps. However, I realize not everyone lives in the BTN TV market.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 6:23 PM | Nope, doesn't help (Score:1)
MAgoBLUE
MAgoBLUE's picture
Joined: 05/21/2010
MGoPoints: 2159

Nope, doesn't help

 

 

"fumbles the snap, takes off. . ."

(9/5/09)

Twitter

  • Login or register to post comments
April 12th, 2011 at 6:41 PM | Yeah, I checked mgoblue.com (Score:1)
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 5825

Yeah, I checked mgoblue.com and they have it listed as being televised on BTN. But I was in the same boat last year, not having BTN. It streamed on bigtennetwork.com for like $5 or something. I just don't see anything on their website right now saying they'll have it.

I am this close to going all Dark Blue in here.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 13th, 2011 at 12:45 PM | I posted this on the board, (Score:1)
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 5825

I posted this on the board, also: I heard back from BTN. They won't be streaming the spring game because they're televising it. I'm a little confused, because I believe it was televised last year, but it was still available online. Oh well. Sorry fellas.

I am this close to going all Dark Blue in here.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 16th, 2011 at 9:11 AM | Thanks for following up. (Score:1)
MAgoBLUE
MAgoBLUE's picture
Joined: 05/21/2010
MGoPoints: 2159

Thanks for following up. Looks like I'm headed to the bar today.

 

 

"fumbles the snap, takes off. . ."

(9/5/09)

Twitter

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.