Picture Pages: Check Yo' Self Comment Count

Brian

HEY TOMMY REES

rees-clapping

CHECK IT OUT I'M ALL GONNA BLITZ YO

rees-clapping-2

LOL LOOK HOW CLOSE I AM TO THE LINE

rees-clapping-3

WHY IS EVERYONE LOOKING AT YOU?

rees-clapping-4

HEY MAN… I'M NOT BLITZING BE COOL

rees-clapping-5

LOL JK YES I AM. HEY… THAT GUY IS OPEN

rees-clapping-6

IF I WAS NOT BLITZING I MAY HAVE BEEN IN THIS AREA

rees-clapping-7

TOMMY REES IS A JERK

rees-clapping-8

I HOPE HE THROWS A BALL BACKWARDS FOR NO REASON LATER

VIDEO

OBJECT LESSONS

This happened a lot. Michigan would line up, show something unsound, and Rees would check into something that would punish the defense. Blue Seoul highlighted another instance where Michigan tipped its blitz:

6140017897_160cb93a6d[1]

Result:

6140018617_750076aa37[1]

Also a result:

sadcat

Michigan would line up in its okie package on plausible running downs like third and five, which caused Rees to check to runs up the middle. With no linebackers and Mike Martin dropping into coverage these went for about 20 yards.

6140576478_514ea3d3d7[1]

Hell, even when good things happened this was going on. Look at this dude on Kovacs's interception:

kovacs-int-2

kovacs-int-3

That is a 65-yard touchdown waiting to happen if Rees's brain isn't going FLOYDFLOYDFLOYDFLOYDFLOYDFLOYD. The difference between a great call and an idiotic call is Rees not being a true sophomore in his fifth start with deep man love for Michael Floyd.

Seriously. Michigan's defensive RPS is going to have huge numbers because Mattison is doing all sorts of crazy stuff. This defense is the philosophical opposite of the bland 4-3 cover twos of Iowa, Michigan State, and Wisconsin.

They show a bunch of different fronts, blitz from everywhere, don't bother to cover guys in the seam when there are no safeties… it's a freak show out there. Sometimes it works. When it doesn't it's ugly. ND's last touchdown is especially galling because Michigan had to know ND would see this massive bust on the Kovacs INT and check into "free seam touchdown" when Michigan checked to cover zero. In this instance there was at least a guy vaguely in the area, but they've got a lot to work on.

Blitzing is not such a good idea when you wave your hand and say "sir: I am blitzing." In the first half Michigan tipped their blitzes a lot. Matters improved when Hawthorne came in—I watched him blitz without so much as taking those anxious shuffle steps, let alone going LOL I'M AT THE LINE—but it's disconcerting to watch the Michigan defense freak out on a QB handclap so consistently. They should know by now that the clap often leads to a check, because the offense did that a ton last year.

So… where is Michigan's check after ND checks? You can't check all the time because then ND's check will be "let's change their play without changing ours" but you have to check some of the time, particularly early.

Avery could have done better here. He's beaten to the inside too easily and can't tackle on the catch. He is not capable of dealing with Mike Floyd. Not many are, but predictions in this space of a bust-out year are not off to a good start. It's early yet.

Not that it would have mattered: Avery can run his slant for Floyd and Eifert is still hand-wavingly wide open. Dude could have gone for 150 against us if Tommy Rees's brain wasn't going FLOYDFLOYDFLOYDFLOYD.

Another reason for worry. This defense is unsound. Does Mattison want it to be unsound because it makes Kovacs pop up for turnovers or does he have little choice in the matter because he's starting a walk-on (Heininger—Kovacs has graduated), a couple freshmen, and only 2.5 non-walkon seniors (RVB, Martin—Woolfolk is the half)?

I don't know, but I'm betting it's the latter. I am glad they've got a week to practice not leaving guys wide open all day. They're busting coverages every other play.

Comments

fitty88

September 14th, 2011 at 5:54 AM ^

I agree that the defense appears unsound at times, but a scheme heavily dependent on complex stunts and blitzes will be unsound as players learn where they are supposed to be. I agree with Brian that we may not quite have the personnel (especially to play straight up base 4-3. I agree with special sauce that in that instance, I would rather they take some chances, potentially confusing the QB and getting big plays periodically. I am somewhat resigned (at least for now) that a big play is going to happen in from time to time in this situation. I do agree that they must work on the discipline, so as to not show the blitz, pre-snap, as much. Overall, however, I think this is an improvement. Tackling is clearly better (not good enough yet) and I haven't seen O-line "swallowing up" the D-line where you can't see our guy's jersey anymore. We are still getting blocked, but with the improved technique, there is at least a chance they could shed a blocker and make a play.

CRex

September 13th, 2011 at 2:58 PM ^

Overall Mattison is doing a good job of trying to win the play before the snap.  Setting up defensive formations, fake blitzes, etc design to confuse the quarterback and make him do something dumb.

Clearly we can't sit in base defense all game, because we lack the skill to survive without getting pressure and pulling out tricks to force turnovers (see Last Year).

The deal is, and accept this now, on the plays we tip our hand or the QB figures out what Mattison is trying to pull, we're going to suffer.  We lack the athletic ability to survive in a base configuration.  When the QB figures out where we're weakening ourselves to get pressure it will just get worse.  On the plays he doesn't figure it out we get a sack, a turnover, etc.

So far we're ahead in the TO margin, the defense has scored points, and we don't let people just bomb us for big plays anymore.  That's solid progress from last year.  It sure as hell beats sitting back and letting Wisconsin kick out asses with nothing but Power I for an entire half.

Greg McMurtry

September 13th, 2011 at 3:10 PM ^

He walks up to the line to cover Floyd, 1 yard off, and no jam.  I don't understand this.  He walks up, plays patty-cake and gets juked.  Looks like Avery is playing the sideline as he turns his feet that way even though Floyd is clearly running a slant.  Give him a quick jam and the play is disrupted.  Also, if Floyd is jammed the ball goes to #80, but if it does, #80 gets destroyed by Kovacs at the 17 yard line.

Franz Schubert

September 13th, 2011 at 5:58 PM ^

Was it really that bad? The defense only allowed 10 points from 2:00 in the first quarter until 00:30 to go in the 4th quarter. Thats 10 points in over 3 full quarters of football and still only 17 points including the broken coverage TD (easily corrected) at the end of the game.

 

ND had 11 possessions after the two quick TDs

 

Punt

Interception

Interception

FG

Punt

Fumble

TD

Punt

fumble

Punt

TD

There were three possessions that resulted in 3 and outs. The defense did its job for the vast majority of the game, creating turnovers, getting huge 3rd down stops in the 2nd half and generaly keeping UM in the game.  The defense is not giving up BIG PLAYS! Thats the stated objective of G. Mattison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BlueHenBlue

September 14th, 2011 at 1:03 AM ^

this defense is ALOT more fun to watch, especially in the 2nd half with adjustments being made. Yes, there's going to be hits and misses, but last year, it was like...all misses.