Put your hands up [Patrick Barron]

Neck Sharpies: If You Run It Then You'd Better Slap a Read On It Comment Count

Seth September 4th, 2019 at 12:38 PM

One of the primary influencers for Michigan's new offensive coordinator Josh Gattis was now-Mississippi State head coach Joe Moorhead. Last year Moorhead spoke with then-SBNation's Bill Connelly, and shared his offensive philosophy. Today we're going to hit on #3/5:

3. Slap a read onto nearly every run, too.

Never put yourself in a position in which your QB doesn’t have options.

“I would say 85 to 90 percent of the runs we called had a second phase or a tag,” Moorhead says. The complexity varied, but “rarely do we just call a run and just hand it off without having the quarterback read somebody at the first, second, or third level.”

From the spring game and the first game, the biggest takeaway so far is that #SpeedInSpace wasn't a tear-down of last year's offense. As they did last year, Michigan is still running their Zone Read/Arc Read/Split Zone/Belly package, and their Pin & Pull/Down G/Counter Trey package as the base of the running game. What's changed is Gattis has added reads whenever the quarterback wasn't doing anything, and more reads to plays that already had them.

Since it's our first week of the season I thought we'd enjoy a trip through the core of Michigan's offense, and how it's been Gattised so far.

[After the JUMP: all the singled safeties]

---------------------------------------

1. Split Zone

This is a play that anyone who runs a zone read as the rock play will have as a paper. Defenses today are well practiced at beating Rich Rod's 20-year-old revolution. Typically the way to do this from a rock-on-rock, "everybody executes their assignment" method is to force a handoff (nobody wants a quarterback in space), have the front seven get to the frontside (our left in the diagram below) when they see the blocking going that direction, and have the unblocked guy set up shop where he's forcing a handoff, but still in position to react to it. Once the ball's in the running back's hands, all those defenders are in position to gum up their gaps, and the backside end is prepared to spring into the carrier's side.

image

You punish this behavior by swinging a blocker from the frontside, crashing into the guy who thinks he's being read (it's called a trap block), and charging the back through the resulting gap, i.e. away from where the rest of the box defenders were just working to stop the zone read.

image

Here's what it looks like:

See Gentry come across and pick the nit. Juwann Bushell Beatty, the right tackle on the bottom of the line, couldn't seal the WLB inside but that doesn't matter because Onwenu's DT is fighting inside like whoa and the WLB can be stuck outside. Usually defensive lines are coached better than this.

What's the problem with Split Zone?

The end crashes sometimes. You can deal with that with a different playcall, but it murders this one.

How do you fix it?

It's difficult to add a read to this because you're already using the quarterback's eyes to entice the unblocked EDGE defender to form up and accept a blindside trap back like a docile little lamb. But if you're looking at him, and he crashes, what if there was somewhere to get the ball to punish that?

The orbital motion could be just for show but I'm not so sure. Michigan ran it again right after, the EDGE defender didn't step up into the trap this time, and Shea's eyes seem to be looking past that guy anyway. I believe that Patterson is reading the safety, #7, here. At least, he's conscious of the safety's reaction to the orbital (i.e. behind the QB) motion.

On a 3rd and two later the motion converts to jet, crossing in front of Patterson before the mesh point with the running back. At the very least this pulls the EDGE defender way wide, where Nick Eubanks can authoritatively end him:

Unfortunately we never got to see Michigan get the ball to Bell on a backside pitch or sweep (BASH) in this game, but you can see it's out there. Michigan did run one split zone from an unbalanced formation in the 1st Quarter that obviously has no read, since there are no eligible receivers in that direction.

Michigan later ran the TE on a wheel route from this look, pulling the safety away from Collins, who scored a touchdown with his crotch in poor CB#3's face.

---------------------------------------

3. Arc Read

Again this is a pull from last year. Arc Read is the scissors to Zone Read's rock and Split Zone's paper. When you run Split Zone a lot, what defenses will start doing is have the unblocked EDGE defender start looking for that trap block and dive into it. That really mucks things up. Watch the defensive end at the top of the formation here. That's a young Kenny Willekes, who's going to notice the Hammerin' Panda coming sideways, turn inward, get low, and plant Khalid Hill right in the gap this is supposed to attack.

If you recall the practices from France there was a clip of Brown coaching the defensive ends, who each had to get into the backfield, set up, and "look for the fullback." This is split zone defense. And like anything else, you can punish defenses for it.

image

The trick is to have that "fullback" or tight end coming across go right past the unblocked EDGE defender—Whoop—and head outside. The quarterback is reading this, and follows his tight end out there. Thus induced to crash, the EDGE defender gets to hug a running back while the quarterback flees out his edge with a lead blocker. It looks like angry cheese. Watch the outside linebacker to our left on this one, and how McKeon just steps around. Whoop!

What's the problem with Arc Reads? Typically the backside alley defender—a safety or a cornerback—has a lot of time to read all of this action in the backfield, come down, and trip up your quarterback.

How do you fix that? Now, an arc read already has a read on it. So how can you add another you ask? Well, after you read, add a run-pass option.

They're new at this so I guess Collins forgot he had the option to run by his cornerback instead of block him, but Shea is clearly looking for something—maybe he wasn't supposed to put it on tape yet? Anyway, since all of the line blocking is in the backfield, and these plays often come down to a cornerback setting the edge, why not screw that guy.

image

This is what spread teams do to you. You think you're beating a receiver's block and sticking the quarterback and then—whoop—ball's over your head. Now, the corner probably won't leave his receiver until the quarterback cross the line of scrimmage, but even that's a big win; Gattis is taking away the defense's opportunities to play aggressively.

---------------------------------------

4. Pin & Pull

The power side of Michigan's running game last year was built around the Pin & Pull concept and its cousins, Down G and Counter Trey.

image

A quick refresher for all of these. The idea is to pin down the frontside with whatever you've got out there, kick out the edge defender with a frontside pulling guard, and in the case of P&P or Counter Trey, bring an extra lead blocker from the backside to pop whoever shows up in the hole. Down G is a variant that uses zone blocking on the backside in case the backside linebacker is shooting into his guard when we sees zone. Counter Trey is the same play run to the backside with some counter action in the backfield in case the backside linebacker is reading the back to decide where to go. Here's a classic example of a pin & pull from IU last year:

What's the problem with Pin & Pull etc.? You always have this backside linebacker free to flow to the play. Watch the weakside LB I circled in the video above. He ultimately uses up the lead blocker, Ruiz, who gave him a pop and Gentry finished him off. That's great that it worked, but getting that block as a Gentry seal outside isn't the most likely outcome of a free hitter.

How do you fix that? In the spring game Michigan made the quarterback the runner and RPO'd the linebacker with a flare screen out the opposite direction of the play. In this one they did a similar thing with jet motion from the Z receiver and read the backside end. Also MTSU slanted into this and mucked up the play so it didn't end up going as planned. You may need a few watches to catch it all.

Try to follow along. Here's the plan:

  1. The Jet Motion switches the cornerback onto the H-tight end (Eubanks) instead of the usual WR/CB matchup.
  2. Hayes, the left tackle, and McKeon, the Y-tight end, are going to block down (sorry those lines were supposed to be purple) on the frontside DT and the frontside LB.
  3. Bredeson, the frontside guard, is supposed to pull and kick out an unblocked frontside DE.
  4. Onwenu, the backside guard, is supposed to pull and meet the Mike LB in the gap.
  5. Patterson is now optioning the backside DE with the jet, Ronnie Bell.
  6. This is supposed to free Mayfield, the right tackle, to get a free release on the weakside linebacker.

image

That doesn't go off because MTSU is 100% attacking this play. The DE's slant means McKeon can't get to his LB. The DT's slant means Hayes can't block down his guy either. Bredeson and Onwenu both get held up behind the mess this generates and that creates two free LBs. Then one of them takes a bad angle, cuts off his buddy, and Turner can turn the corner, picking up a few more because Eubanks's CB got spun around. Thanks for sucking, guys.

Anyway the WLB (#6), never mattered because he sucked out on the jet so hard that Mayfield decided to (fruitlessly) chase the MLB instead.

They ran a pin and pull again later on with a normal backside zone read. This was meant to give the offense a third puller—the backside tackle, Hayes—but the MLB blitz undid the good from the read. The fact that they pulled Hayes here instead of having him go downfield makes me think there might be an RPO from this look down the road:

---------------------------------------

5. Power

God's play. Kick out the edge, block down inside of that, pull a guard around as a lead blocker.

image

Handed down from generation to generation already in its most perfect form.

What's the problem with Power? Nothing. This play is so money that safeties often have to get involved to beat it.

How do you fix that? Teams often screw with the safeties getting too aggressive against Power by calling play-action. Let's slap an RPO on it.

That's a bad cornerback against Black on a slant with help. MTSU is luck to have a good free safety or else this gets all the yards.

---------------------------------------

Lessons

With the pin & pull stuff, the backside reads didn't gain Michigan much, since the backside tackles this freed up weren't in position to do much against linebackers heading for the frontside. I guess they matter more if the DE gives a keep read, but the pull in the second example looked like they were having a live practice with a concept they didn't know would be useful (it was in the 1920s).

Other than that, Michigan was removing free defenders left and right from the same base plays they ran last year. This is a good way to #SpeedInSpace while retaining everything these experienced players have learned. And there are a lot of reads left to explore. This is gonna be fun.

Comments

reshp1

September 4th, 2019 at 2:49 PM ^

This stuff is why the rabbling about "not seeing speed in space" in the snowflakes threads is so ridiculous. Gattis's improvements aren't going to be a bunch of gadget plays with people running around in non-sensical ways. Most of the time, it's going to be subtle stuff like motions to freeze defenders forced to read instead of attack. There's going to be occasional diabolical stuff that'll really screw with the defense, but you're going to see those only in high leverage scenarios, of which there really weren't any in this game.

Squash34

September 4th, 2019 at 3:40 PM ^

I'll piggyback off this post by saying it is seen as little subtle stuff to many fans because its things like adding RPO options off of plays Harbaugh has already had in the offense. The truth is adding these seemingly little things is going to crush people down the road when the offense is runnung on all cylinders. The arc read with an RPO after the pull is some nasty nasty stuff because when the CB or FS being optioned comes up its a TD play. And like seth said, after Michigan hits a few teams with it the CB or FS being option will effectively just man up with the WR or TE and be run out of the play at least until the qb pulls which is pretty big.

JBombs3224

September 4th, 2019 at 12:55 PM ^

Excellent breakdown. Every time I read about RPO concepts, it makes me wonder if college football will ever change the OL downfield rule to match the NFL. I'm just happy Michigan has finally embraced it like so many of the successful offenses in college football. Of course, now that Michigan is doing it, the rule will likely change...

chunkums

September 4th, 2019 at 1:09 PM ^

Awesome post. Thanks for this! It's great to see us sticking with the elements of last year's offense that worked, but adding additional modern concepts to them. 

EastCoast_Wolv…

September 4th, 2019 at 1:09 PM ^

This is excellent! The colored lines added to the GIFs really makes it so much easier to follow.

Does anyone else feel worse about the O-line after watching these? It just doesn't look like the O-line is getting much push. I get the RPS component is probably at least a partial explanation, but it's hard to look at the two pin & pull videos or the power video and think "those guys are winning their 1-on-1 matchups".

On the 2nd pin & pull with Hayes pulling and the MLB blitzing multiple O-linemen end up in the backfield

On the power play at the end, even though they threw it there are no D-linemen who are pushed downfield.

I am admittedly NOT an o-line expert so someone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I would just have hoped for more push against an undersized opponent.

EastCoast_Wolv…

September 4th, 2019 at 1:27 PM ^

Agreed it adds a dimension but not sure push is just for run plays. For example, on the last power play, my understanding is that Patterson is reading the safety. If the safety doesn't crash then he hands it off to the RB. That decision is (I think) independent of the O-line/D-line battle. But if the safety hadn't crashed there it's hard to see that being a successful power run. Or at least one where the O-line did a good job.

Squash34

September 4th, 2019 at 3:59 PM ^

MTSU looks to be in cover 1 and bringing both linebacker, which they did from either cover 1 or 0 all night. The safety seems to be coming down because he has the #2 wr on that side in man and that is the RB. 

When a team just doesn't care what you are doing to exploit them and just throwing blitz after blitz, it's going to mess up the run options of RPO but completely expose them to the pass option. 

Squash34

September 4th, 2019 at 4:03 PM ^

You cant push your guy that far down field on an RPO because you will get an illegal man down field flag if the QB throws. The reason why seth said that the last pin and pull had the RT pull too and that made him think there will probably see an RPO off this is because the RT normally shoots to the scond levl to get a LB but that would get a flag if its an pass from an RPO.

Carpetbagger

September 4th, 2019 at 1:49 PM ^

I thought the O-line looked fine. The MTSU D was bringing all the bodies every play so it's not like they got to double anyone ever. And given some of these plays have a pass option attached, at least in theory, you don't want to move people too far downfield and have QB2 pull and pass and you be illegally downfield.

I love all the jank and misdirection in offenses like these. Goes back to the best play action pass man on the planet Steve DeBerg.

 

EastCoast_Wolv…

September 4th, 2019 at 1:58 PM ^

I hope you're right-- while this post made me more skeptical about the O-line it is awesome to see Gattis building on some of the more successful pieces from last year's O-line. When I read this my first thought was "Imagine if we had an RPO available in the Northwestern game when they were crashing hard on every running play and sitting back on every pass".

Squash34

September 4th, 2019 at 4:18 PM ^

There are a few different ways you can attack a team running cover 0 or cover 1. The black TD was checked into to attack this. Scissor routes puts a safety in cover 1 in a bind, and if it's cover 0 there is no deep safety and puts the guys in man in a bad spot too. Same with the 4 verts TD to McKeon, as is a slot fade like they did to Mike S. 

There is a few different ways you can go about messing with the defense bfor choosing to bring so much pressure outside of mesh or slot slants or the like. 

reshp1

September 4th, 2019 at 3:16 PM ^

Look a little bit closer and in slow mo, a lot of guys are getting good blocks even if you don't see the massive pile push or caverns.

1st pin and pull is killed by the slant as Seth pointed out. Turner could and maybe should recognize that and cut back into the cavern between the optioned/kicked out DE and everyone else slanting away. Tough ask because his first steps are hard toward the sideline.

2nd pin and pull, Mayfield and McKeon comprehensively smoke their guys and wall off the defenders on the left of the gap. There's a blitz on so Ruiz has a LB and a DT to deal with and the DT gets in the backfield a bit more than you'd like but Bredeson still deals with it pretty well. Onwenu takes a poor angle and has to dive at his guy, but even then, the guy barely gets a hand on the RB. RB gets to the safeties before having to downshift and MTSU #20 makes a great play to tackle from behind.

Power, Bredeson I think probably screws up this play by not passing off the DT he's doubling to Ruiz and getting one of the LBs charging at the line. Onwenu has two guys in the hole, chooses on and clobbers him. Bredeson and Hayes, hold that gap open pretty well, there's just a free hitter because the DT got a 2 for 1 on Bredeson and Onwenu. Assignment aside, the blocks Bredeson and Hayes made created a pretty definitive gap for Onwenu to pull through and the RB to follow (or probably bounce out one gap once he presses the hole). It's also possible the play design doesn't call for the OL to release because they're ineligible to prevent a penalty. 

Dodort

September 4th, 2019 at 1:19 PM ^

On the Arc Read RPO, I wonder if Collins reads the depth of the DB.  If the DB crashes, Collins runs by him.  If the DB hangs out deep, like he does in the above play, Collins blocks.  

rc15

September 4th, 2019 at 1:35 PM ^

Also wonder if there is any coaching on down/distance as to a preference. On 3rd down I'd rather Patterson keep and guarantee a 1st down. On 1st and 10 or 2nd and short I'd rather take the risk of Collins running by him. May be too much to process during a game/play though.

lilpenny1316

September 4th, 2019 at 1:26 PM ^

I know it's been two years, but I still can't watch clips from the MSU game. LOL.

This is excellent.  Last year served a nice base for Gattis to install his offense on top of.  I hope this also helps our defense by having to go up against this offense all season in practice.

BlueMan80

September 4th, 2019 at 1:33 PM ^

Thanks for explaining all of that.  It’s great that Gattis is trying to take what they know and do a +1 to make each play harder to defend.  I try to watch the blocking schemes and understand the play strategy which is hard to do while watching the game live.

jakerblue

September 4th, 2019 at 1:51 PM ^

if a runner crosses the LOS with the ball but laterals the ball back behind the LOS, can it then be passed forward, or once the ball crosses the LOS it can't go forward?

Forsakenprole

September 4th, 2019 at 2:01 PM ^

I cannot express how grateful I am that you take the time to make these. It shows me how little I know about the game, even though I watch 12 games a weekend and even go through replays for teams I don’t give a damn about. 

How did you come to such an advanced knowledge of the game?

Blue Middle

September 4th, 2019 at 2:04 PM ^

The Power RPO seems like it has the potential to be a brutally effective play.  A pulling guard with a real threat to run happening right in front of a post route?  There is no good way to defend that.

Dragon XIII

September 4th, 2019 at 2:12 PM ^

Great article; I love the analysis of our new O.  Adds a much better understanding of the danger an RPO offense poses.

That said, am I the only one that notices the incorrect use of Rock, Paper, Scissors?  Lol.  If our first play is "rock" and the defense counters this, then our counter to that shouldn't be paper (that's what the defense would throw to counter our rock), it would be scissors.  I know rock, paper, scissors sounds nicer when labeling the plays, but it should go in reverse (rock, scissors, paper).  I don't know why this popped in my head and threw me in enough funk to comment on it...I guess I must play too much RPS to settle arguments lol.

Anyway, great article.  Keep up the good stuff.  I'm looking forward to future editions of these when we face some real meat in our schedule!

MGoStrength

September 4th, 2019 at 2:12 PM ^

This sounds like a long and complicated way of saying two things...one, you are only as good as your QB is at reading and reacting to the defense, and two, it's unlikely there will be so many offensive stalls because no matter what the defense does there should be a check to something else that puts it under more pressure.  Essentially, the only way to seemingly beat this style of offense on a consistent basis minus the QB choosing the wrong play or offensive players making mistakes, is the defensive players beat their guy on every play.  If they don't, someone, somewhere will be open or have a lane to run through.  This sounds promising.  I think Shea is a smart guy, Charbonnet's football IQ is well beyond his years, the o-line is experienced and pretty good, and the WRs if healthy are great.  The sky is the limit if they can learn the nuances and checks quick enough.  

Cranky Dave

September 4th, 2019 at 2:56 PM ^

For some reason I cannot get the gifs to play, maybe it's because I'm reading this at work...makes it harder to fully understand what's happening.  Frustrating because I enjoy Neck Sharpies a lot

Squash34

September 4th, 2019 at 3:01 PM ^

It really feels like the QB should be reading the split zone with the orbit motion differently. It looks like a modern triple option where the QB should be reading the end first and give to the RB if he doesnt crash. If he does crash it feels like Shea should pull and go into a speed option with the orbit player and then read the force defender to see if he should keep or pitch.