NCAA Inquiry Update Today
Press release:
---------
U-M to hold media briefing about NCAA report
ANN ARBOR, Mich. --- The University of Michigan will hold a media briefing at 1 p.m. ET Tuesday, Feb. 23, in the Regents Room at the Fleming Administration Building regarding the NCAA report about the football program.
The briefing will include U-M President Mary Sue Coleman, incoming athletic director David Brandon and football coach Rich Rodriguez. They will take questions immediately following their statements.
---------
In the months since the university launched its internal investigation I've heard a thousand things of dubious provenance that range from an asteroid hitting Ann Arbor to the NCAA taking away ten scholarships… from the Free Press. So I'm loathe to say anything definitively.
Here's the but you were waiting for: but I do have a couple of folk I trust who have proven themselves one step away from important people. These folk say the results of the investigation are "not expected to have major implications." They will report something on at least two issues:
- Michigan checks up on players to make sure they are in class, and has been doing this since Bo. (I know someone who's had football players as a TA and can confirm that polo-shirt wearing folk checked in on luminaries like Jake Long.) This has been going on during summer classes; apparently it is not kosher to do this.
- The "quality control" people at issue in the investigation have football coaching experience. One of them, for instance, is our new safeties/OLBs coach. Before his time at Michigan he had some stints at smaller schools. Someone testified that the QC people did not have coaching experience, which may have been an "honest mistake," which the NCAA will rule on. How could this be an honest mistake?
The people testifying weren't the gophers or anyone at the workouts. It sounds like they were people in compliance or elsewhere in the athletic department but not the football program who were either ignorant or deceitful, either of which would explain the rumors going around about heads rolling in the aftermath of the report.
I followed up but couldn't get any clarification as to whether not expecting "major implications" meant they didn't expect any major violations. A major violation can have a minimal effect, as we've seen consistently over the past decade, but any major violation would sully Michigan's to-date pristine record and create another totally awesome media avalanche. It would be just like Michigan to get hit by the NCAA for making sure its players are in class.
Again, I think the above is worth posting and is accurate. It may not be comprehensive and may be a positive spin on something nastier. We'll find out in about an hour.
We'll have a liveblog going at 1PM. Tim will be twittering as well.
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:00 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:13 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:00 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:04 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:25 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:47 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:01 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:20 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:02 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:03 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:05 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:10 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:10 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:12 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:12 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:15 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:14 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:15 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:23 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:29 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:26 PM ^
It would be just like Michigan to get hit by the NCAA for making sure its players are in class.Sheeyit. I hope the NCAA dings us for that. I want them to. It would be the first NCAA violation in history we could actually use as a recruiting tool. "You see, son, every school talks the talk about taking care of their players as people. We do it so well we got punished for it."
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:36 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:47 PM ^
BOOM! /claydavis'dFIFY.
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:27 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:33 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:38 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:41 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:54 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:41 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:46 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 12:52 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 1:01 PM ^
February 23rd, 2010 at 1:27 PM ^
Comments