Fall Camp Presser Transcript 8-22-13: Al Borges Comment Count

Heiko

Opening remarks:

"These high chairs are not really built for me. Hrnggh. How's my hair look?"

Great. Bad news about Amara Darboh. How do you compensate for that?

"Well, fortunately we have some pretty good kids that can fill in, but I feel probably worse for him than anybody. The kid had an excellent spring ball and capped it off with a fabulous two-a-days. He was playing good. I feel bad because I really feel like this was going to be a big, almost maybe even a coming-out season for him. But he's got a redshirt, so I guess there's a silver lining, but I just feel bad for the kid."

Does this maybe put a little more pressure on Jehu Chesson?

"Well Jehu would do it. Joe Reynolds will be out there. Jeremy Jackson. We have some capable replacements, thank goodness. All those guys, not just Jehu, but everybody."

Will you consider any position changes to try to get some depth?

"Oh I don't think so. I think we're still okay. We can't lose too many more."

Are any of the freshmen capable at this point?

"No. No. Not really."

Not yet?

"No. Not yet. But we're not completing eliminating them, either. Not yet, anyway."

Can you get more creative with Devin in the passing game as well?

"Devin Funchess? We have a couple Devins ... well yeah. We would do that anyway whether or not we had Amara. He's going to be -- he's always going to be a huge factor in our passing game. We're always thinking of different ways to utilize him just like we did a year ago. That's always a factor. That's always at the foremost on our mind. He's a weapon at tight end, and he's got to be used as a weapon."

MGoTeachersPet: In your book, Coaching The West Coast Quarterback, you delineate several receiver attributes that quarterbacks need to know. You have your "hands" guy, your "deep threat," your "guy who's almost always open." Which one of those was Amara?

"He was a little bit of all them. That's ... that's a good question, you know?"

MGo: Thanks!

"You're welcome. It's better than your jump ball question. But he was a little bit of all of them. He's a hands guy, faster than you'd think he is, although he's fast on the clock. Jumps, range, good range, he kind of had all of that stuff. He'd fit what you're looking for. I would not stereotype him as a possession guy or anything like that. He's pretty much got the whole package."

Are you going to do more with two or three-tight end packages?

"I think so. Yeah. We're more equipped for it. How much we use is going to be by game. Certain games depending on how people defend you, it could be more prominent. But we are now a little more equipped for it, where it was really wasn't a viable option the last couple of years."

What kind of camp has Jake Butt had?

"Good. He's bigger. He's stronger, he's got good hands. He's what we recruited, maybe even a little better than what we thought. He's still learning the offense. He's still got his issues on occasion, but not many. They're going away. And being here for spring ball was invaluable because he got 15 days of acclimating himself to this system."

Hoke said yesterday that Toussaint would be the starter. What have you seen about Toussaint for Hoke to say something like that?

"Well, you know, Fitz, he knows what he's doing. He hits the ground running. He was always a pretty smart player to start with. We never went through a lot of growing pains with him from a systematic perspective. But now that he's done it a lot, he knows the pickup in our passing game, he understands our run game, and now we're tracking more home-position plays, which kind of catered to the way he is anyway. And like I said before, I don't see any residuals of the injury, so he's Fitz again. We'll throw him out there and see what he does, but I have a feeling if we give him a little room, he's going to do something good."

What do you need to see out of Derrick Green?

"Well he's just got to keep learning the system. He's only been here for a couple weeks, and he's still figuring things out. But you can tell there's some talent there. As soon as he does, he's going to be a force."

MGoQuestion: How much of a running back's vision is innate vs. coached?

"Some of it's instinctive. What you do with a running back is you aim him where he needs to go in terms of landmarks in the run game. You make him aware of where his help is coming from, but at one point in time, his instincts have got to tell him where to go. Some guys are better at it than others. The one thing I will say is the more you do it, the better you get at it. Some guys never get very good vision. But generally, with a lot of repetitions, if you run the same play 25 times and see it blocked differently every time, you start getting a feel for where the creases in the defense are."

MGoFollowup: Does practicing against a defense that's as good as Greg Mattison's make it harder to coach some of those things?

"No, it's like any other defense. They're not going to sit still all the time. No. We get pretty much every look. When the game comes, there's not a lot of surprises. I mean, it can be painful sometimes if you don't block it very well, but it's good for you at the end of the day."

When will you be able to say the offense is game ready?

"We're not game ready."

Why not?

"Because we aren't close to a game yet. We still are in the process of shaving it down to the people that will play in the game, which is about to happen here soon, at which time you can really start to think about being game ready. But we still have some auditioning, I guess? That's a bad word. Guys are still being evaluated. But we know some of them, now, don't get me wrong, but there's still a few spots that are still out there. And once we get that shored up, then we can really start honing in on getting game ready."

Will that be decided at the end of this week?

"Somewhere around then. Yeah. It's getting close to that time."

Impressions from the scrimmage?

"Uh. Hrng hmm. We did some good stuff. Um. We were really run-heavy. We wanted to establish our run game, and get a look to some of our tailbacks. But in doing so, we did some good stuff, and like any scrimmage, you have some ugly plays, too. But in evaluating, I'll say this about it: it was productive. Whether there were good plays or bad plays, there was a lot of good stuff to coach from the tape. Lot of stuff to be encouraged by, a lot of stuff to fix."

What do you like about Deveon Smith?

"He hammers the ball in there. He's a no-nonsense runner. He hits it hard, and he's not easy to tackle. You're going to feel him when he gets through there. I think he's going to be a really good back. He's big, and he's strong, and he accelerates well."

Chances he'll play this year?

"Who knows? It's still too early to say."

Shane Morris didn't play in the scrimmage. Is the competition between him and Brian Cleary --

"Still going. Yup. Still going. That'll shore itself up soon, too. Just so you know."

Are you guys scrimmaging this week? Will you hammer it out then?

"By the end of the week we should have a pretty good idea what's going to happen with that."

How has Brian Cleary improved?

"Just understanding so much better. In terms of knowing where to go with the ball and timing the throws, he's improved -- he made a quantum leap [since spring]. He seldom makes an error in judgment. Now where he has to shore his game up is taking advantage of those scenarios every time they present themselves. Making a routine throw, making a routine play with consistency. He is getting there. He's getting better every day. The thing about Brian Cleary is he's a really smart kid and he's got a good arm. He seldom makes the same mistake twice."

MGoQuestion: How would you compare him to where Russell Bellomy was at this point last year?

"Well, Russ was a little further along. Russ is probably a little more athletic than Brian. He can get out of some jams. But that would be probably very similar in a lot of ways with their intellect. Russ is probably a little faster."

Does not making a decision on the offensive line sacrifice some of the chemistry?

"Oh yeah. It does a little bit, yeah. But then it's the pains that you go through to put the best five out there. It does, but the good thing about it is at one point in time, when you've established that, you've got the best five getting the chemistry, rather than rolling guys through there and there never being any chemistry. When you settle it, let them roll. There is a little bit of that."

What have you seen out of Jeremy Gallon?

"Well, I mean, he's probably our best receiver right now. He's good against bump and run coverage. As I said before, he plays taller than he is. He can win jump balls and he's about 5-8. He'll say he's taller, but he's lying. [He gets] in and out of cuts fast, reliable in the middle of the defense, and he does the dirty work, too. When somebody's bearing down on him, he'll catch the ball in traffic. He's just reliable. You know what he's going to do, and he has a big play dimension. Jeremy has very good speed, but he's not what I would classify as a burner. But he's crafty and knows how to get open."

At center, do smarts sometimes outweigh physical ability?

"As long as you're capable. I learned a long time ago that you don't necessarily play the smartest players. You play the best players. Sometimes the smartest players are the best players, and sometimes the smartest players play better than what you think the best player is. That's a roundabout answer, but center requires a certain intellect. If you don't have it, then you're going to struggle at the position. But you don't want to put a smart guy out there that can't block anybody but knows how to target the front."

MGoQuestion: Do you see a difference in the offensive line's ability to target on zone blocking schemes vs. man/power blocking?

"They all have a better feel for the whole thing, whether we're gap blocking, whether we're zone blocking. They all have a better feel for it. We still have errors. We still have things that we have to shore up. We watch the tape and we still see some things that need to be coached. I can't honestly say we've mastered any one scheme. Sometimes we mess up a power scheme, sometimes we mess up a zone scheme. Sometimes we do them both good, you know?"

Have you ever have a young offensive lineman like Kyle Kalis, who has so much confidence?

"Yeah. I've had guys like that. They think they belong, and that's good. That's what you want. You want young guys that think they belong an think they fit. If you're a young guy who's in awe of your surroundings, you're going to have a heck of a time playing here. It can be very intimidating. If you believe you're good enough and can prove that you are, usually you probably are."

Do you have to knock that guy down a little bit?

"Constantly. That's with everybody. They come here and they're five stars and four stars [Ed: High five!], but when they walk in the door they're no stars. Sometimes it's a rude awakening for some guys. Kids have to be get used to getting coached every single snap. Sometimes forcefully. So yeah. Some kids hit the ground running. It is different. This is Michigan and this is college football and the expectations are high."

What's the role of fullback these days? How much do you use them in practice?

"Quite a bit. Yeah. Our fullback is basically a blocker and an occasional receiver. His job, depending on the play, can be either to kick somebody out and eliminate somebody or cover somebody up who missed a block. That happens, too. The identity of the fullback has changed since when I first started coaching. The fullback was a runner and a receiver and a this and a that. But now the fullback is more of a blocker and a receiver. That's what we ask our kids to do, and if they're tough and willing to get their nose bloody and have a little bit to them when they hit a guy, they have a chance to play."

Who do you like there?

"Same kids. Joe Kerridge, Sione [Houma], Wyatt Shallman. They've all shown good stuff. One time or another they all look like they can play here, and some have. Joe's played quite a bit already."

Comments

M-Dog

August 22nd, 2013 at 3:11 PM ^

MGoTeachersPet: In your book, Coaching The West Coast Quarterback, you delineate several receiver attributes that quarterbacks need to know. You have your "hands" guy, your "deep threat," your "guy who's almost always open." Which one of those was Amara?

"He was a little bit of all them. That's ... that's a good question, you know?"

MGo: Thanks!

"You're welcome. It's better than your jump ball question. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

It's like a scene from "Love Story", complete with the playful bantering.

 

 

stephenrjking

August 22nd, 2013 at 3:00 PM ^

Jeremy Gallon: "Good speed... Not what I would classify as a burner."

Agree wholeheartedly with this. I think there was some excess enthusiasm about his speed early in his career, but he doesn't have the top gear of a 4.3 guy who accelerates his way out of a pretty lousy bubble screen the way that, say, DeAnthony Thomas does.

And this is to his credit: a lot of guys just rely on their athleticism, and force OCs to gameplan ways to "get them the ball in space" because they can't do it themselves. Rather than be an average-at-best slot guy, he has developed into a very good receiver who gets open.

wahooverine

August 22nd, 2013 at 3:22 PM ^

Am I reading into this, or is the staff not too impressed yet with the freshman WR's?  

"Are any of the freshmen capable at this point?

"No. No. Not really."

Not yet?

"No. Not yet. But we're not completing eliminating them, either. Not yet, anyway." "

This and previous statements and analyses I've read here seem to sum up to nil praise for this group. Or is it simpy that they are freshman?  Are they simply middling prospects who were exactly what the staff thought out of the box? On the otherhand if Drake Harris were on campus I doubt the prospect of him contributing early as a freshman would be so immediately and categorically dismissed.  

Just wanted some thoughts on it.

MGoLogan

August 22nd, 2013 at 3:51 PM ^

I think it has more to do with them being true freshman than anything else.  While there was some hype, Darboh and Chesson never really threatened to make a move up the depth chart last year.  Blocking is so important for the position under this staff, and that is probably the hardest thing for a true freshman WR to be able to do.  I wouldn't worry about it just yet, but if there is still no hype surrounding them next fall there might be reason for concern.

funkywolve

August 22nd, 2013 at 5:02 PM ^

That'd be my guess.  Also, when the coaches talk about the freshmen running backs they often mention they've missed some time due to classes.  I'd venture the freshmen wr's are in the same situation.  They're competing against guys that know the system/plays and at the same time you're not getting as many reps cause of other obligations.

GoBlue2002

August 22nd, 2013 at 10:48 PM ^

Even Aaron Burbridge didn't do much of anything for State until the fifth or sixth game last season. It take time to pick up a scheme and if you don't know how to block you won't see the field at Michigan anyway. Some of the freshman will have catches this year but likely not until a fhandful of games in or when we're steamrolling Akron.

HipsterCat

August 22nd, 2013 at 5:02 PM ^

I dont believe any of them enrolled early so they have been in camp for like 3ish weeks. It takes time to learn the playbook, get comfortable in the offense and with the quarterback and with the speed/strength of college corners and linebackers. Many times when you see freshmen contributing early especially early on in the season its simpler plays for them like running a go route or designated norfleet sweep until like the 2nd half of the season and they get comfortable and the coaches get comfortable/need them

TakeTheField

August 22nd, 2013 at 5:40 PM ^

I don't think many people thought that any of the freshmen would get more than a whiff of the field this year, if that.  It's not too common even for highly touted WR and guys who end up being stars to have much of an impact their first year, and none of these guys comes in with eye-popping physical tools.  Unless we get hit with more injuries, I wouldn't be surprised to see all three redshirt.

Harris might do something as a true freshman, but he might not.  He'll have a much better chance if he enrolls early.

DonAZ

August 22nd, 2013 at 4:09 PM ^

That was a great set of questions and some good answers as well.

I'm torn trying to decide what's really going on here ... either the team has issues and the coaches are just telling it like it is, or they're sandbagging a bit and there's a juggernaut about to be unleashed on CMU and ND.

BursleysFinest

August 22nd, 2013 at 4:53 PM ^

 

  The only positions I'm really worried about is the same one we've been obsessing over since last year and which wont be answered until at least ND, namely, the interior O-Line.

On Defense (a little OT), the secondary movement is probably because of the bowl game (one J.T. Floyd suspension throwing everything out of whack), so they're grooming a lot of people to play different positions, so if bad things happen, they can still keep the most talented players on the field doing things they've at least practiced doing before.

HipsterCat

August 22nd, 2013 at 5:39 PM ^

coaches have high standards and want everything to be perfect every time. I mean look at how pissed saban still was after they won the freakin national championship again. so having some good reps and bad reps means everybody is growing and learning. they still have a week of practice until the first game to get everything set and ready.

Space Coyote

August 22nd, 2013 at 7:35 PM ^

Any chance next time you talk to Borges you can ask him about the possibility of moving Gardner back to WR to cover up for the lose of Darboh. Make sure you get video, I want to see how red his face gets before he attacks you by swinging his chair at your head.