Dewayne Peace Decommits, And, Yes, Is "Out"
Well, at least we've been spared four years of tortured puns:
"To tell you the truth, I wanted to play wide receiver," Peace said. "I told the Michigan coaches that I wanted to play receiver. At the beginning of my commitment they said I could play cornerback or receiver. Then as time went on, I went on my visit and told them I just wanted to play receiver and if I could only play corner then I would look for another school to go to. They told me that it was fine and I could play receiver. Then something came up where they didn't land enough corners so that is where they wanted me."
And that is where he not wanted… him. Self. Or something. So he decommitted and is now favoring Kansas.
As usual, there are multiple ways to spin this:
- Michigan would rather have Travante Stallworth and Je'ron Stokes and Willie Haulstead instead of the #100 player in Texas, or
- They really really need corners.
Neither makes perfect sense, as Michigan isn't exactly overflowing with 2009 receivers of the not-slot variety and none of the receivers above look like locks or anything. But it's hard to interpret a conversation like "I know you told us if you had to play corner you would decommit, but we want you at corner" as anything other than a polite way to say goodbye.
That's fine if they replace Peace with an equivalent prospect. On the surface that shouldn't be too hard since Peace is a replacement-level Michigan recruit, but Chitownblue makes a good point when he notes that Michigan currently has no replacement-level recruits available at corner and will likely be offering a sketchy player or two at the position. The best case scenario appears to be an Adrian Witty (two star CB with KSU, FIU offers) commit that induces a Denard Robinson (big-time QB/ATH/DB recruit) commit. Then Tate Forcier becomes Colt McBabyJesus and Robinson is free to be a kickass corner.
That's a lot to ask for.
January 8th, 2009 at 1:41 PM ^
January 8th, 2009 at 1:45 PM ^
January 8th, 2009 at 3:48 PM ^
January 8th, 2009 at 2:20 PM ^
January 8th, 2009 at 3:26 PM ^
January 8th, 2009 at 1:54 PM ^
January 8th, 2009 at 2:00 PM ^
January 8th, 2009 at 2:03 PM ^
January 8th, 2009 at 2:19 PM ^
January 8th, 2009 at 3:43 PM ^
January 8th, 2009 at 5:56 PM ^
January 8th, 2009 at 7:05 PM ^
January 9th, 2009 at 1:05 AM ^
January 9th, 2009 at 11:23 AM ^
January 9th, 2009 at 10:39 AM ^
January 9th, 2009 at 10:49 AM ^
January 9th, 2009 at 1:00 PM ^
Comments