WTF is happening with the Assistant Coaching arms race?

Submitted by iawolve on
I missed this one, but happened to catch it on Dr. Saturday (whose text is below). It is bad enough USC stomps the Big Ten, do they have to eff up the coaching ranks as well? Carroll's $1M OC, Sarkisian's $900k DC and now this with Kiffin at UT? $400k for an OLB coach? Isn't that more than we will pay our new DC? "Clearly, though, UT is committed to fortifying that limb, as its final push to fill out Kiffin's coaching staff proved late last week. Consider that at the start of last season, the most expensive assistant coach in the country was Florida State's offensive coordinator/coach-in-waiting Jimbo Fisher, at a base salary of $600,000. Tennessee not only nearly doubled that for Kiffin's grizzled dad, Monte, to come on as defensive coordinator (he'll make a little more than $1 million), but also topped it for Ed Orgeron's noted recruiting prowess (Coach O will bring in $650,000 as recruiting coordinator and defensive line coach). Last week, they went for broke to lure Alabama's ace recruiter, Lance Thompson, for $400,000 -- as an outside linebackers coach who'll play second fiddle to Orgeron on the recruiting trail. That's well over $2 million for three assistants, more than most schools -- even SEC schools -- allocate for their entire staff of assistants."

Comments

chitownblue (not verified)

January 22nd, 2009 at 9:50 PM ^

1. In some cases, probably. But Michigan sells out every game, and has the largest apparell revenues in college football. I think the financial gains would be minimal. 2. I think it really varies from staff to staff. It seems like Rodriguez doesn't stress recruiting from his coordinators - others may. Every school has a "recruiting coordinator" - our is Gibson, I believe - which is sort of like a specialist. Though, our most productive this year seems to be Rod Smith.

ShockFX

January 22nd, 2009 at 11:02 PM ^

"The fact that the university may actually spend money on being an educational instituion (sic) rather than hiring a linebackers coach doesn't bother me in the least." Allow me to slightly reframe what Chitown is saying. You guys are right, since the AD has a surplus, it's not an either or choice as to hiring a LB coach or hiring a teacher. However, the general concept chitown is advancing is that if we were right at break-even, then it is a choice. Since there is no guarantee that we always have an AD surplus, the attitude of NOT spending exorbitant amounts on coaches is what chitown supports.

chitownblue (not verified)

January 23rd, 2009 at 5:07 PM ^

Well, it's a fallacy that salaries are based on value to society. Teachers don't make much, Alex Rodriguez makes more than a doctor, etc. It's market based - a garbageman provides a vital service, but anyone can become one tomorrow - there is minimal training or unique skill to the job. There are around 10 people who have established that they can build a top-5 football program. Because of that tiny club, their market value increases. I'm not saying it's right, I'm not saying it's the way it should be. I'm just sayin'.