OT: Heisman Selection
January 1st, 2017 at 9:28 AM ^
January 1st, 2017 at 9:31 AM ^
I get the idea of wanting the Heisman decided after the bowl game, but I actually think it would not be the best approach. The point of the trophy is who had the best season overall, not who played best in the bowl game. If you handed it after, though, there would be a heavy bias towards performance in the bowls - and especially in the playoffs. I prefer having it function as a whole-season award, not as a playoff MVP award, which is probably what would happen if we moved the date.
January 1st, 2017 at 9:55 AM ^
I think Jackson won because he was so far ahead of the field at the beginning of the season that people had already made their minds up, even when he faltered down the stretch.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 1st, 2017 at 10:20 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 1st, 2017 at 10:14 AM ^
The vast majority of voters are not former players but media. Something like 750 of the 900 votes are by media members. I never thought highly of the Heisman (how many have success at the next level?) but not inviting Keenan Reynolds to the 2015 ceremony was a travesty.
January 1st, 2017 at 10:30 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 1st, 2017 at 10:49 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 1st, 2017 at 10:21 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 1st, 2017 at 10:26 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 1st, 2017 at 11:40 AM ^
... and it is the reason I don't want to expand the playoff to 8 teams.
I know I am old and stodgy, but I like bowl season.
January 1st, 2017 at 11:58 AM ^
January 1st, 2017 at 12:27 PM ^
January 1st, 2017 at 1:45 PM ^