NIL Money and Income Tax

Submitted by GPCharles on July 13th, 2022 at 11:16 AM

NIL money is taxable to the recipient.  This should give states without a state income tax a 4-6% advantage in the amount that can be offered over those states that have a personal income tax.  FYI - California can go as high as 13%.

Wave83

July 13th, 2022 at 12:11 PM ^

I would bet that many home states will seek to tax college students instead of the state where the college is located.  My son had to pay income tax (or at least report it -- not sure how much tax was due) in Ohio and in our city (local income tax) when he worked part time in Ann Arbor while at UM.  If that is true, the tax laws of state where the college is located may be irrelevant.

I'm not a tax attorney, so don't take this to the bank, but I think I may be right about this.

ST3

July 13th, 2022 at 12:20 PM ^

While California’s income tax is high, the property tax is actually quite low. California schools would benefit from a Reggie Bush style NIL compensation scheme. 

potomacduc

July 13th, 2022 at 12:44 PM ^

This certainly is a concern in professional sports and definitely factors into negotiations. Of course salary caps and other collective bargaining terms factor in for professional leagues, but nonetheless it will still matter to recruits. They will need to do a little bit of math to determine what offers really mean. It's not as simple as where the school they attend is located. It will also matter where they maintain a permanent residence as well as where the NIL will be earned.

An example is if a business owner pays $1M to a kid from state X who attends his alma mater in state Y to travel to state Z and film a commercial for his business there. Depending upon the state(s) involved, the tax implications could be very different.  

potomacduc

July 13th, 2022 at 6:10 PM ^

These are 18 year old kids who have no guarantees. They could wash out or lose their football career to injury. This could be the only payday they get. Sure, the other criteria you put out there are important and maybe even more important than the total $$. Nonetheless, I have no problem with top recruits using $$ as criteria. For the top recruits, it's hundreds of thousands of dollars,. Investing just that 5% conservatively at 18 years old can have a tremendous impact on the financial security of these young athletes. 

NeverPunt

July 13th, 2022 at 1:05 PM ^

I think this is giving too much credit to NIL final number best offers. Yes there may be a couple of "best offer, bottom line" recruits out there. 

I think for the most part however, these kids are still evaluating the overall package - school, town, weather, educational opportunties, coaches, team, fellow recruits, starting opportunity/depth chart, chances of making the playoffs/title game, winning, getting NFL exposure, player development, and yes NIL will be a major final factor. 

I don't think percentage points on taxes will be heavily weighed by most recruits.

DonAZ

July 13th, 2022 at 1:27 PM ^

Related: regardless of the state income tax, the NIL money is also federally taxable.  Two things: (1) I hope sensible people are advising these young folks to put aside money for the tax bill; and (2) I wonder if, for the purpose of taxation, the NIL would be considered "self employment" income, and thus subject to FICA withholding?