Phil Steele's Strength of Schedule Rankings - Michigan No. 37

Submitted by MGoShoe on

Phil Steele has ranked all 120 FBS teams by strength of schedule.   By his formula, Michigan's sked is the 37th toughest nationally and 5th in the conference. 

Big Ten 2010 Strength of Schedule

Team

Conference Rank

National Rank

Minnesota

1

5

Penn State

2

16

Illinois

3

21

Iowa

4

35

Michigan

5

37

Michigan State

6

58

Ohio State

7

61

Indiana

8

71

Purdue

9

74

Wisconsin

10

85

Northwestern

11

94

...[H]ere are my 2010 toughest schedules, which take two major factors into account. The first is my 9 sets of Power Ratings. This ensures that an FCS team is rated much lower than Oklahoma and USC, two Top 10 teams that were just 8-5 and 9-4 last year.

The second factor is the amount of home and away games played. As an example, this year some teams will have as many as 8 home games, while others play as many as 8 on the road. 

His top 10 nationally are: Iowa State, South Carolina, UCLA, Mississippi State, Minnesota, Orgegon State, Washington, Miami, FL, Duke, LSU.

the_white_tiger

June 8th, 2010 at 10:51 PM ^

Iowa State has Texas, OU, Nebraska, and Iowa... that's just unfair. I got the mag this morning, now I just need to commit it to memory by the second. EDIT: and Utah, non-conference. Just brutal.

tenerson

June 8th, 2010 at 11:00 PM ^

Chizik leaving was likely the best thing to ever happen to ISU. Now they have coordinators that are capable and not just the HC's cronies. You will notice that not many of his assistants went to Auburn. Also, Paul Rhoads brought in a better first class that Chizik ever had. They are better off now than they were 2 years ago.

tenerson

June 8th, 2010 at 10:58 PM ^

We won't be in the MAC, probably the MWC or C-USA but not the MAC.

 

On a side not eouor schedule blows ass. Iowa away and OK, UT away in back to back weeks. It will be brutal. Looking like a 5 win season. 

 

maizenbluenc

June 9th, 2010 at 9:28 AM ^

The way I read how the rankings were derrived, it would seem part is on how competitive the team being ranked is (e.g., Iowa State), versus how strong the opponents are. I think ND may be challenged on the first part of that equation, as well as by some of the teams in the second part of the equation.