Hockey at-large bid... I'm feeling better?

Submitted by Wolverine In Exile on

Last week went about as well as you can hope for as a Michigan fan looking for some positivity regarding an at-large bid to the NCAA tourney. As discussed in last week's diary, Michigan is in a dog fight for one of the last at-large bids into the NCAA hockey tourney if they do not win the B1G Tournament, the victor of which gets an auto-bid.

Again, as detailed last week, the Pairwise Rankings (PWR) are your Harry Potter-esque sorting hat for entrance into the NCAA tournament. PWR, in basic terms, compares every team in Div-I hockey against each other based on three factors: RPI (a computer metric taking into account your record, winning % of your team, your opponents, and your opponents' opponents- bonus points are awarded for wins against Top 20 opponents and road wins), record against common opponents, and head to head record. This then gives each team a PWR "score" or how many of those indiviudal bi-lateral PWR comparisons a team has an advantage in.

The tournament accepts 16 teams: autobid conference tournament champions from Hockey East, ECAC, Atlantic Hockey, B1G, WCHA, and NCHC; at-large bids from the remaining top PWR teams until a 16 team field is created. Many many moons ago, ECAC and the predecessor to Atlantic Hockey were considered "bid stealers" since non-regular season champions of their tournaments were typically well outside the at-large bid range in PWR but thee regular season champ would still get an at-large bid because of a ridiculously high PWR. This year (and frankly the last couple), only Atlantic Hockey is a bid stealer conference-- and even then, since their regular season champ is already still low in the PWR (Robert Morris, 25th), if a team not named Robert Morris wins their tournament for the auto-bid, the conference is still only getting in one team. Consider the Atlantic Hockey autobid as slot #16 in the NCAA tournament-- so for practical purposes, there are at most 10 at-large slots left. At minimum, the last at-large team will be the 15th slot in PWR; at worst, 12-13 could be the cut-off line.

In Michigan's case, they sit tied for 15th with UMass-Lowell with 44 comparisons won. Ultimate tiebreaker between two teams tied in PWR is RPI, and Michigan leads here by a slim margin. The relevent teams around us in PWR as of Monday:

TEAM, PWR SCORE (UMich centric), RPI, comparisons won vs. Michigan

11. Minnesota,   2-4, .5435, RPI/Common opponents (tied 2-2 in head to head)

12. Quinnipiac, 1-1, .5481, RPI (overall comparison to Quinnipiac since RPI is higher)

13. Yale, 0-1, .5433, RPI (tied in common opponents)

14. Bowling Green, 0-2, .5407, RPI / Common opponents

15. Michigan, RPI = .5404

16. UMass-Lowell, 2-1, .5394, Common opponents (Mich won head to head & RPI)

17. St Cloud St Fighting Mollies, 1-0, .5369

18. Colgate, 2-0, .5339, (Mich wins RPI & common opponents)

19. Vermont, 2-0, .5357 (Mich wins RPI & common opponents)

Ok, first caveat: PWR is very volatile in this grouping. Every team from 14-19 is basically within one weekend of each other in RPI, and one RPI flip can shuffle standings around significantly. Second caveat: Atlantic, ECAC and Hockey East start their tournaments this weekend, so some teams like Vermont are on life support, and other teams like Colgate, UM-L, Yale, and Quinnipiac may only have 1 more game left before Selection Sunday.

OBSERVATIONS

- I'm surprised how well Michigan is positioned for an at-large. We essentially sit in the last at-large slot now if chalk holds in conference tourneys, and with a 4-0 finish to the regular season we probably can absorb a loss in the BTT semi and still get in as the 13 or 14 slot. We finish 4-0/3-1 in the regular season and lose in the BTT finals, we're challenging for a 3-seed. We finish 4-0/3-1 in the regular season and win the BTT, we're a high 3 seed no doubt.

- This next weekend against Penn St will bascially tell us our tourney fate. We win both, we're probably in good position for an at-large team barring a sweep by MSU. We split, we need a sweep against Sparty to keep at-large hopes alive. We drop both against PSU, we're sweating bullets and probably at a win-to-get-in situation in the BTT.

- Minnesota is probably in no matter what barring a complete collapse the next two weekends. They may slip from a 3 to a 4 seed, but they're probably feeling safe if they sweep this weekend.

- We are within a 1 game difference of flipping RPI with Bowling Green. Getting into the 14 slot at least is a HUGE difference. Atlantic Hockey has already killed the 16 slot as an at-large bid this year.  As I mentioned in a comment to another post this weekend, a non-regular season champ in the tourney from an ECAC, Hockey East, or NCHC school probably isn't a game killer since they have so many teams in the running above us in PWR now anyway, unless its a true Cinderella (team in the mid 20's in PWR) making a run. Even then, they're probably knocking out a team from their own conference who's in the 13-19 PWR slot now.

- There's an interesting scenario developing though where you could possibly get 3 B1G teams in, as crappy as the conference is. You'd need: (1) Michigan and Minnesota to sweep out the regular season  keeping Minnesota as a border 2/3 seed team in PWR going into the BTT. (2) Minnesota would lose in a semi. Pick your team, it doesn't matter. (3) Michigan would need to get to the BTT Finals and then lose to the team Minnesota dropped a semi to. This would possibley cause: (A) MSU/PSU/OSU/Wiscy to get an auto-bid as a 4-seed, (B) Minnesota would dropoff a 2 line to a 3 or 4 seed, and (C) Michigan would slip in as one of the last two at-large teams.

- You could also have the converse though where the B1G regular season champs don't make the NCAA tourney if say Michigan and Minnesota played mediocre hockey to close out the season with Michigan winning the conference by a game or tie-breakers and then losing a semi-final or final to a cinderella B1G team, essentially getting its at-large bid stolen by the B1G tourney champ. On paper if you said the conference regular season champ of a league with Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan St didn't get a NCAA tourney bid 4 years ago, Jim Delaney would have choked on his ham sandwich. But such is life in the B1G Hockey.

I'll leave the results from last week and this week's cheering primer to Canadian, who I'm sure will be chipping with his part in a day or so. SPOILER ALERT-- Cheer, cheer for Ol'... ALABAMA-HUNTSVILLE????

Comments

gwkrlghl

March 2nd, 2015 at 1:39 PM ^

I look at @PSU, @PSU, @MSU, MSU and see 2-2 unless PSU really is just collapsing right now. It also looks like Minnesota has the easier path to the regular season title. They're 3 pts behind but get two games vs OSU and then two home games vs. PSU. Much easier than ours.

Time will tell

Wolverine In Exile

March 2nd, 2015 at 2:25 PM ^

If we come out of the next two weeks 3-1 with a B1G regular season title, does this count as a "good" season? Or if we go 2-2 and then win the B1G tourney in despiration mode and be the ONLY B1G team in the tourney, does that count as a good season b/c we made the tourney? There's just a lot of screwiness this year. I mean we're feasibly looking at a year in which Hockey East and the B1G may get 4 bids... in total between the conferences. Yeesh. I'm kind of the mindset this year of an English soccer fan. Collect the trophies, no matter what they are, and call it a day. 

gwkrlghl

March 2nd, 2015 at 3:03 PM ^

I'm not sure if the NCHC deserves credit or the B1G/HEA is just that bad but it's looking like the NCHC may get 5 or 6 of 8 teams in right now. Bananas.

And I'd call it a good season if we made the tournament and won a game. That would be equivalent to a top 10 finish which is...fine I guess. A team with this talent should be able to do more than that though. If the offense lights up again we could still be in contention for a national title frankly.

Number 7

March 3rd, 2015 at 9:26 AM ^

First off, selection sunday doesn't happen until all the conference tournaments are finished.  I'm not sure about Hockey East, but I know that the ECAC format has two rounds of best-of-three series before a single-elmination final four.  The upshot is that Colgate, Yale, and Quinnipiac all have this coming weekend off, and then each hosts a best-of-three starting next Friday.  Also, watch out for St. Lawrence.  They may be 20th or 21st in the PWR, but have the chops to move quickly up the volatile mix in the rankings.

mgoblue0970

March 4th, 2015 at 9:45 PM ^

I don't believe Michigan is positioned "well" as you say for an at large bid.  I did the math of the conference tourneys and Michigan is the last team in PROVIDED there aren't any upsets in the conference tourneys. 

When you say Michigan is positioned for an at large, I'm assuming that to be they don't get the B1G auto bid.  For this exercise, I have Michigan losing to Minny in the final.

For the conference tourneys, I went with scratch brackets across the board based upon current confernece seedings.  If your definition of "well positioned" means scratch brackets in all the other conferneces -- so be it.  I've been around long enough to see that weirder things have happened.

I don't post here with any ill will but I really wish you'd quit with getting everyone's hopes up when there's still a lot of hockey to be played.