Unverified Voracity Is Now Just A Series Of David DeJulius Embeds Comment Count

Brian

hqdefault

Keith Jackson remembered by several people. At SBN:

That training meant calling everything ABC threw at him, but college football was different. One of Jackson’s gifts that made him so, so good at college football games was to make the viewer feel at home wherever the game might be. Ann Arbor became the Big House, Nebraska became the friendliest town in the world, and even beneath “the broad shoulders of the San Gabriel Mountains” you could feel at home, because ... well Keith did, didn’t he? Nowhere wasn’t home on a Saturday if Keith was calling it, because he had a map with a single line connecting everything.

This was all part of a whole to him. The things with names had definite pronunciations only Keith could nail; the things without names would be given them in time. The language of this sport — right down to the love for the great, the ugly, the undersized, the local, and the brutal — is his.

By Bob Griese:

"That big smiling face, and just the thrill and the love he had for doing college football," Bob Griese told SportsCenter when asked what he'd remember about Jackson, his longtime broadcast partner whom he started working with in 1985.

"He did it for a long, long time. ... He never intruded on the game. It was always about the kids on the field. Never, never shining the light on himself. And that was one of the things that I most admired about him."

By Andy Staples:

It was probably on some lazy Saturday afternoon or evening in 1990 when the sound burned itself into my memory. I was in seventh grade, and a Notre Dame linebacker with a previously checkered career was in the midst of an All-America season. He must have been playing on the road, because if he’d been in South Bend, Brent Musburger would have been the one saying his name. Instead, Keith Jackson was calling the game, and when that linebacker made a tackle, Jackson said…

Miiichael Stooooonebreaker.

And there it was.

From that point forward, the quintessence of college football in my mind was Keith Jackson saying the name Michael Stonebreaker as a drumline pounds out a beat between plays. I can’t think of the sport without hearing those two words uttered by that voice. I cover college football for a living, so I think about college football a lot. Consequently, my brain frequently serves up the memory of Keith Jackson identifying a 225-pound middle linebacker from Louisiana playing for a Catholic university in Indiana.

"I can't get them any more open than that." You may have had some similar frustrations midway through the Maryland game:

Bi-weekly David DeJulius hamblasting video. This one features nine(!) threes in a 49-point performance against Chicago Orr:

Sounds like fun. Next year's schedule is kind of a doozy:

@ ND, @ OSU, @ MSU plus crossover games against a couple ten win teams in Wisconsin and Northwestern will do that.

Priority one: don't pay anyone. This would be an insane way to defuse the increasing media heat on the NCAA for restricting player mobility:

The grad transfer rule already sucks out loud for lower-level schools. Creating open season on every all-conference football and basketball player turns the MAC into a collection of JUCOs, essentially. It's far worse for competitive balance than paying kids would be, because you get to swoop in on anyone you missed and yoink them. You're also inviting kids to leave whatever degree program they're in for sports, damaging your hoary claims to academic integrity.

But it would eliminate a set of arguments against amateurism, so full speed ahead. Because keeping the money is all they care about.

Frank Ragnow on Ben Herbert. Strong, detailed praise for Michigan's new S&C guy:

"He's probably one of the most detail-oriented people I've ever met," Ragnow said. He then paused. "Actually, he is the most detail-oriented person I've ever been around. The first thing he's going to do with his players is a thorough individual evaluation of them. He'll learn their tendencies, strengths and weaknesses and try to get a feel for how their body reacts to different movements and different processes. Nutrition-wise, I'm guessing the Michigan players are going to learn a lot. Coach Herb is always finding new ways to gain an edge on the nutrition side of things and it was probably the one part of how he did things that I learned and took the most out of."

In addition to being good at S&C stuff, Ragnow "wouldn't let" Steve Lorenz hang up until he'd expressed what an excellent dude he was as well.

Exit various Irish. In addition to a few NFL departures, Brian Kelly booted four dudes. Three are offensive skill guys and will be relevant for Michigan's upcoming series against the Irish:

Stepherson was arguably Notre Dame’s most explosive receiver last season, finishing with 19 catches for 359 yards and five touchdowns. However, he was held out of the season’s first four games for a suspension that Notre Dame never publicly acknowledged.

The departures of McIntosh and Holmes come after a single public rules violation and seriously dent Notre Dame’s running back depth chart. With Josh Adams off to the NFL Draft, the Irish will likely open spring ball with just three scholarship running backs in Dexter Williams, Tony Jones Jr. and early enrollee Jahmir Smith.

The fourth is a DL who wasn't going to be in the rotation anyway.

Etc.: Andrew Ebbett and Chad Kolarik make the Canadian and American Olympic hockey teams, respectively. Francis Atuahene set to go high in the MLS Superdraft. Trey Burke reunited with THJ. Minnesota reporter suggests that there should be a Red Berenson trophy. I'm in.

Comments

NateVolk

January 17th, 2018 at 9:39 PM ^

Any schedule is a lot harder when you aren't any good.  A lot easier when you have a good team. People act like Michigan will play them all in a 48 hour period. There is an art to managing a season with a lot of tough games and winning most or all of them. 

The bulk of the issue is are you a good team or are you not?

A secondary issue is the state of the teams you are playing that week. We may think we know but outside of OSU and I guess Wisconsin, we really don't know how good any other team on that schedule will be. Two of them we keep wetting our pants over combined for 7 wins just a little over a year ago. 

Michigan was a couple plays from being a 10 win team this year. But they were not good. Had they coughed up the ball 3 and not 5 times against MSU  and punched it in to go up 20 against South Carolina, the fact of not being good wouldn't have changed. 

It was a young, fragile team learning and rebuilding on the fly.  Being able to wave 10 wins and not 8 in rival fans faces held nothing for me. It proved nothing. 

Just happy it's over because being loaded with mostly 19 year olds logging every down will make for some shaky college football. 

Bring in all hard games in the world next year and let the chips fall where they may. There is enough talent here to gel and make a run for league and National playoffs.

outsidethebox

January 17th, 2018 at 9:58 PM ^

While intuitively and logically that sounds correct in reality...it's not generally how it works. Football is a very demanding game and there are tolls that are exacted from individuals and teams during the course of a season-physically, mentallyt and emotionally. And unless your coach is Belichick and your QB is Brady the sum total of these tolls puts your team at an advantage or not at he end of the season-depending upon the level of cmpetition you have played. It is surely even more difficult for these college kids.

blueloosh

January 18th, 2018 at 4:43 AM ^

This is the best perspective on Michigan football I’ve read in weeks. Absolutely correct.

Outsidethebox, no one denies some schedules are more demanding than others. The point is that we can and should be able to develop a team that can beat anyone and contend for it all. The 1997 schedule was a gauntlet; it felt like a breeze. The question is, are we getting to the level of our 1997 and 2016 (it’s true) teams that could have beat anyone, including in a playoff. Last year the answer was no way—but the key thing wasn’t the numerical W/L outcome, it was the level of play and trajectory of personnel.

JTP

January 17th, 2018 at 10:55 PM ^

That means nothing to me for next year. Those things can change quick injuries poor QB, or poor line play, we Michigan have to get better and worry about one game at a time those things will take care of themselves! Our coaching staff has to be better next year or we’ll be an average team again, been watching since 1969 the past 9 years haven’t been good yes a few bowl games a Sugar Bowl win and Orange Bowl loss but if the bar is high the Rose Bowl or the final four is the goal. The Michigan arrogance lead to the down fall we hired 2 coaches who should never have been hired but because we’re Michigan things would be ok well they haven’t been!

BlueintheLou

January 18th, 2018 at 3:38 AM ^

My Keith Jackson engrained memory was the Colorado-Nebraska, Big-12 title game where Bobby Purify ran wild on the Huskers. I just remember Jackson's calls so well, "Bobby PURIFY!" "Purrrifffyyyyyy!"

HHW

January 18th, 2018 at 9:48 AM ^

How is that possible. Is the competition less than elite in these clips? Seems like at least a 4*, maybe size actually matters here?