Ben Herbert Is The New S&C Guy
"is this a strength coach" visual test: check
Former Wisconsin and Arkansas S&C coach Ben Herbert's name has been floating around as a possible replacement for Kevin Tolbert, for fairly obvious manball related reasons, and now that hire is official:
Michigan has identified a candidate for its strength and conditioning opening.
First referenced by The Michigan Insider's Sam Webb on our premium message boards last week, the Wolverines intend to hire former Arkansas S&C coach Ben Hebert to take over the S&C opening left behind by Kevin Tolbert.
Herbert was at Wisconsin for S&C coach for 11 years, the last four of which as the head S&C guy, before leaving with Bret Bielema to go to Arkansas four years ago. That didn't work out quite as well as Herbert might have hoped, but Arkansas did have some consistently enormous offensive lines, just like Wisconsin did before him. Herbert's time at UW is probably more instructive since the Badgers aren't operating at a severe talent deficit to most of their opponents, and picking someone up from the program that makes the most out of the least recruiting in the Big Ten, and possibly the nation, seems like a good plan.
Post-Barwis I'm skeptical that there's a big difference between any reasonably up-to-date strength coaches, FWIW. I didn't think Michigan's team seemed like it had any major S&C issues—the defense was dominant and the offensive line started mashing guys about midway through the season. Harbaugh's post-OSU comment that Michigan needed to get stronger didn't really mesh with what I saw, which was a team that went toe to toe with the Buckeyes and would have won with a C- QB performance. If anything might have been an issue under Tolbert it's conditioning, not raw gert-orf-me strength.
But unleash the comments, all the same.
December 30th, 2017 at 5:40 PM ^
This seems to be the appropriate place to insert this:
December 30th, 2017 at 4:27 PM ^
December 30th, 2017 at 4:37 PM ^
2018 can't get here fast enough! Putting out those *redemption* vibes.
December 30th, 2017 at 5:22 PM ^
December 30th, 2017 at 5:34 PM ^
Wasn't anything wrong with the S&C coaching you say? Ummm, maybe not with the actualy program but obviously there were motivational issues. Tolbert was in no way getting the players to get the most from theirselves. Maybe you guys don't grasp that when you see your offensive lineman with flabby arms, soemthing is lacking. These young guys want to go pro in the NFL and get awesome contracts? You got to be fucking kidding me. It doesn't take a lot to rip yourself up and look like an NFL guy. Especially when you are young like that. Witnessed way too many d-lineman and o-lineman on this team the past however many years that don't look intimidating at all. Sure as hell aren't kicking anyones asses on the field either all throughout their schedule. Technique is great but power rules boys and girls. Hopefully this guy can take this team over the top. He looks the part.
December 30th, 2017 at 5:46 PM ^
December 30th, 2017 at 6:03 PM ^
From what I heard from a player all of this speculation is wrong and Tolbert wasn't at fault for anything, and in fact the whole thing is really bizarre at best if what I heard is true. I can't say what I heard, but I don't like seeing what seems like very wrong and defamatory speculation about Tolbert.
December 30th, 2017 at 6:35 PM ^
December 30th, 2017 at 6:10 PM ^
December 30th, 2017 at 6:25 PM ^
December 30th, 2017 at 7:05 PM ^
Michigan's OL is pretty damn big. The problem is not the size. Its' the scheme and foot speed. Either you man block or you are a zone blocking scheme period. Next, the first step means everything for pass blocking and Michigan's OL instead of moving their feet and punching are either beaten off of the ball with the first step or allow the pocket to collapse too quickly. Not having a mobile QB in today's game is the BIGGEST problem. Speight looked like a giant 250 plant standing there. O'Korn took off before a pocket could even develop and Peter's is not the most gifted runner either. Ask yourself this question. Which team out of the final four Monday night does not have a running threat as a QB?? NONE!!! That's why the Buckeyes always beat us because their damn QB is a major run threat like JT Barrett has been for the past 12 seasons he has played in Columbus. Patterson will make a HUGE difference for Michigan in this area. Harbaugh played the position long ago and the QB position has changed drastically from 1985 and the 90's. The game speed has changed so much since then (especially on the DL) Harbaugh knows this and knows that QB position is what is truly holding him back from pputting Michigan on top. If he was setlled on Peter's then why go after the 5 star Patterson? Because Patterson is very very good and has PROVEN himself against the SEC speed and athleticism. No matter what the media tries to make of it- If Patterson is eligible next year then the competetion won't even be close between him and Peter's. Patterson played high school ball in Texas and Florida. Patterson played in Indiana. Not even close
December 30th, 2017 at 7:22 PM ^
Peter's what?
December 30th, 2017 at 8:07 PM ^
Honestly, I'm kinda with Brian on this. If an S&C coach is up-to-date and understands that different positions need different programs, then my next question is what do the HC and coordinators think of him. If they're OK with him, I'm OK.
If I were in the HC position, I'd be asking (i) is this person up-to-date and (ii) will his/her schtick get old after awhile. If the answer is "yes and no", and the HC and coordinators are fine, then I'm fine. You need all of (a) a person who knows their shit, (b) works hard, and (c) can motivate the players.
I mean, this is the sort of thing that's really hard to judge from the outside, so I'm OK with it if those in the know are.
December 30th, 2017 at 8:30 PM ^
December 30th, 2017 at 9:26 PM ^
December 31st, 2017 at 10:23 AM ^
"is this a strength coach" visual test: check
December 31st, 2017 at 2:13 PM ^
December 31st, 2017 at 8:18 PM ^
Comments