Preview: Northwestern
The Essentials
WHAT | Michigan v. Northwestern |
---|---|
WHERE | Ann Arbor, MI |
WHEN | 2:30PM EST January 10th, 2010 |
THE LINE | |
TELEVISION | Big Ten Network |
*Line provided by online sports betting site Sportsbetting.com.
Michigan
Michigan is coming off yet another interesting game in terms of predictive power: a big win might make them overconfident, and the game itself was a tale of two halves, with Michigan getting dominated in the first frame, and bouncing back in the second for the win. So which Michigan team will we see against the 'Cats? It remains to be seen.
The Wolverines should continue to feed DeShawn Sims if the threes aren't falling, instead of continuing to jack up marginal looks. If the open look is available, you can't fault a guy for taking it, even if he misses. The shooting woes have come and gone, but hopefully they won't be a factor in Crisler Arena.
Northwestern
Coming into the season, Northwestern was planning to have a big year, and potentially land their first-ever(!) NCAA tournament bid. Those dreams seemed to be dashed when two of their biggest stars, Kevin Coble and Jeff Ryan, were injured at the beginning of the season. A team effort has kept NU in the hunt, and their only losses have been to Butler, Illinois, and Michigan State.
John Shurna, Drew Crawford, and Michael Thompson have seriously picked up the slack, keeping the NCAA dream alive. The 5-10 Thompson leads in shooting, assists, minutes played, and offensive rating. Shurna, however, gets the most usage on the team, taking the most shots.
Tempo-Free Breakdown
If you need an explanation of the stats, check out Ken Pomeroy.
Michigan v. Northwestern: National Ranks | |||
---|---|---|---|
Category | Michigan Rank | Northwestern Rank | Advantage |
Mich eFG% v. NU Def eFG% | 171 | 70 | NN |
Mich Def eFG% v. NU eFG% | 216 | 81 | NN |
Mich TO% v. NU Def TO% |
3 | 126 | MM |
Mich Def TO% v. NU TO% | 40 | 21 | N |
Mich OReb% v. NU DReb% |
264 | 105 | NN |
Mich DReb% v. NU OReb% | 269 | 233 | N |
Mich FTR v. NU Opp FTR |
329 | 180 | NN |
Mich Opp FTR v. NU FTR |
12 | 173 | MM |
Mich AdjO v. NU AdjD | 67 | 73 | - |
Mich AdjD v. NU AdjO | 87 | 101 | M |
Difference of more than 10 places in the national rankings get a 1-letter advantage, more than 100 gets a 2-letter advantage, more than 200 gets a 3-letter advantage, etc.
This is a pretty even statistical matchup, with neither team having more than a 2-letter advantage in a particular category. Northwestern does lead in more categories, but Michigan has advantages in overall efficiency on either side of the ball (however slight it may be when Michigan has the rock). There is something to be said for strength of schedule as well, with the Wildcats coming in ranked #249 overall, and Michigan #37. The Wolverines' numbers came against tougher units.
Michigan should be able to hold onto the ball, and keep Northwestern off the free throw line (especially since the 'Cats are a perimeter-oriented team). Michigan might have trouble coming down with rebounds, like usual, but Northwestern doesn't have great size outside of 6-11 center Luka Mirkovic, so the competition factor may play a role here.
Overall, this feels like a game that Michigan should win, especially at home. Kenpom thinks so, giving the Wolverines a 2/3 chance of coming out with a win. Northwestern has only beaten 3 opponents in the top 100 teams in the nation, with only Iowa state currently ranked ahead of Michigan by Pomeroy. I think this is a game that see-saws back and forth in the first half, but Michigan manages to maintain a lead throughout the second half, though never running away with the game.
Elsewhere
UMHoops previews the game.
January 10th, 2010 at 10:07 AM ^
January 10th, 2010 at 10:47 AM ^
January 10th, 2010 at 10:43 AM ^
January 10th, 2010 at 1:34 PM ^
January 10th, 2010 at 1:43 PM ^
January 10th, 2010 at 1:46 PM ^
January 10th, 2010 at 4:07 PM ^
January 10th, 2010 at 4:11 PM ^
January 10th, 2010 at 4:18 PM ^
January 10th, 2010 at 4:20 PM ^
January 10th, 2010 at 4:26 PM ^
January 10th, 2010 at 4:30 PM ^
January 10th, 2010 at 7:37 PM ^
January 10th, 2010 at 10:49 PM ^
Comments