Unverified Voracity Sows Chaos, Reaps The Wildcat Comment Count

Brian

Important (not important). This is a frog.

DMvRfd1[1]

I have been exhorted to call this MGoFrog and make it a thing. I'm afraid that by doing so I will give Adidas an idea for a Michigan uniform, unfortunately.

Important (important). Will Heininger features in an Outside The Lines article on mental health issues for athletes:

"I had emotional pain that was overwhelming; I would wake up, and from morning until I feel asleep -- when I was able sleep -- I had troubling thoughts that were utterly consuming," said the 2011 Michigan honors graduate. "Not a minute would go by in a day, without my depression on my mind … this, this felt impossible."

One of the things CAPA is fighting for is better treatment for these sorts of issues; read the whole thing. Both of the whole things.

image

"Please enjoy this punch in the nuts." –DJ Newbill

CHAOS! Did you happen to watch the rote blowouts in the Big Ten last night? You did not, because Ohio State and Wisconsin lost to Penn State and Northwestern, respectively. At home. As our own BISB said:

Yes. They're trying to push each other into the lava, but yes. Or Adam Jacobi:

The Big Ten Is Full of Blood and Spiders

Jacboi has a nice table that indicates the upcoming "no days off in the Big Ten"/"this conference is so deep" announcer memes are in fact on point:

Year Conf. Rating Rank Avg. B1G Worst Team Rating
2003 .7688 5 No. 56 Penn State 210
2004 .7520 5 No. 62 Penn State 218
2005 .7862 3 No. 47 Penn State 215
2006 .7831 4 No. 54 Purdue 152
2007 .8058 4 No. 51 Minnesota 170
2008 .7625 5 No. 65 Northwestern 192
2009 .8144 5 No. 46 Indiana 209
2010 .7851 4 No. 60 Indiana 198
2011 .8527 1 No. 31 Iowa 92
2012 .8263 1 No. 32 Nebraska 150
2013 .8459 1 No. 34 Penn State 148
2014 .8310 1 No. 42 Northwestern 118

The closest thing to an easy out is the Northwestern team that is a half-game out of a first round bye in the Big Ten tourney; there's not even a last year's Penn State to kick around. There's a last year's Penn State plus Tim Frazier. See cliff above.

This is good and bad for Michigan. In the Kenpom world it's good since Michigan's beaten PSU handily and has yet to play OSU, but in the NCAA seeding world you get more credit for beating 6-seed OSU and terrible PSU than you get for beating 10-seed OSU and mediocre PSU. Neither of these effects are huge, so the correct reaction is probably just to point and laugh*. (And fume at how bad Big Ten refs are.)

*[But probably not at Aaron Craft. He got crossed over for the game winner, which was Newbill rushing a wrist-flick shot because Craft was coming. Meanwhile, Tim Frazier's statline: 8 points on 9 shot attempts, 7 assists, 6 TO. No offense to Derrick Walton, but put Craft on this Michigan team and they are a juggernaut. I shouldn't have mentioned this.]

102615840-09153724[1]

Bill Carmody: gone, but not forgotten

The Wildcat conundrum. Meanwhile, we've been talking about how fascinating Northwestern is on the podcast for the last couple weeks. And boy, aren't they? Last year they were extremely bad, around 140th on both sides of the ball. The Wildcats then:

  • fired Bill Carmody
  • hired Chris Collins
  • graduated two low-usage, mediocre efficiency seniors
  • graduated a high usage, low efficiency senior
  • got Drew Crawford back
  • added a pretty terrible offensive player in freshman Sanjay Lumpkin, who they play starter's minutes

For some reason, the result is a massively unbalanced version of the team they were last year. Northwestern is 11th(!!!) in defensive efficiency on Kenpom for no discernable reason whatsoever. They have plummeted to 320th on offense. Their games are incredibly watchable for unwatchable games, because you're always trying to unravel the mystery of why the Wildcats are elite on defense. It makes no sense. No sense at all. Here's John Gasaway trying to figure it out.

Meanwhile, Northwestern is a half-game out of a first-round bye in the Big Ten Tournament and that gets BIG TENNNN, right? I think that's a BIG TENNNN.

By the way. Michigan shot 63% from two against the Wildcats and averaged 1.21 points per possession, and Alex Olah—Gasaway's best guess as to why NW is playing so much better D—was on the court for 30 minutes.

Recruiting battles past. OSU has a couple of guys on their team that Michigan pursued, and it's interesting to see their development. Or lack thereof, as the case may be.

Michigan stopped recruiting Amadeo Della Valle so they could go after Caris LeVert, who was right under OSU's nose. OSU grabs ADV; Michigan gets LeVert. In year two, Della Valle is a very poor man's LeVert: a skinny shooting guard with some ability to drive, but one who's only getting 30% of OSU's minutes as they struggle to generate anything on offense. LeVert generates a lot of assists; ADV is generating few. Hell, LeVert has replaced about 95% of Tim Hardaway's production a year after Michigan was trying to redshirt him.

The context of the team is important, but it seems like that Michigan made the right choice on that one.

The other guy on the OSU roster Michigan was involved with is Amir Williams, OSU's mercurial center. Williams has oven mitts for hands and gets pulled on the regular despite OSU's near total lack of post players to replace him with; he has seemingly not improved one whit from the absentminded freshman I remember from two years ago. Michigan was never really a consideration for Williams, but it's kind of amazing that OSU would probably trade him for Jordan Morgan without blinking.

Either way. In yesterday's post on Northwestern's prospective union I mentioned that the NLRB had flipped back and forth on the issue of student-employees being able to organize based on assertions from a 2006 paper. In that paper the most recent ruling had gone against the students trying to organize. Well, that has again flipped:

“There’s case law for the NLRB involving teaching assistants which supports their position,” Baum said. “There have been different decisions both ways. What they’re saying is that this really is a form of litigation to bring about change because they’re asking for something very similar.”

In December 2013, the American Arbitration Association announced that graduate teaching and research assistants at New York University had officially unionized. The group is the only graduate assistants’ union at a private university in the U.S.

Demonstrating the volatility of the NLRB, graduate assistants at NYU were granted the ability to negotiate a union contract and both improved health benefits and increased stipends in 2000. But in 2005 the ruling was switched following a case involving Brown graduate assistants in which the NLRB ruled that graduate assistants are students, not employees, and therefore cannot unionize.

The recent overturn of the 2005 ruling, though, is an encouraging sign for the newly formed CAPA.

One gets the sense that the NLRB tends to blow whichever way the White House does. In CAPA's case there seems to be no way to put the cat back in the bag if Northwestern does indeed get certified, so now is as good a time to strike as any.

Typical. FERPA means whatever Universities want it to mean, so the university says they will not release any details about Brendan Gibbons. This is in line with the university's general stance on releasing information—don't do it, because we have to cover our ass. Suspicious in most cases, here it verges on appalling given the fact that FERPA specifically states this:

The text of FERPA notes that the law shouldn’t “be construed to prohibit an institution of postsecondary education from disclosing the final results of any disciplinary proceeding conducted by such institution against a student who is an alleged perpetrator of any crime of violence … or a nonforcible sex offense, if the institution determines as a result of that disciplinary proceeding that the student committed a violation of the institution’s rules or policies with respect to such crime or offense.”

With lurid conspiracy theories flying back and forth, everyone would be better off if Michigan came forth and showed everyone exactly what happened to expel a student four years after the incident that got him expelled transpired. This is not an athletic department thing, but rather a larger pattern of CYA secrecy that's beneath the university. Or at least should be.

Etc.: Spilly's quest for balls. Death to the neutral site game. Penn State is discounting season tickets for recent grads. Men's basketball standings. Michigan gets a 2016 D commit.

Comments

mgobaran

January 30th, 2014 at 1:56 PM ^

When it happened the rules were set up so that the complaintant themselves had to report it, with evidence and all that jazz.

The new revisions pretty much let anyone report it. So that guy from that article a few months back (if you guys remember when that was brought up again) could build a case and present it on her behalf. Now I don't know if that guy had anything to do with it. But it may have spurred this whole thing to open up again. Can't find a link, and I don't feel like searching "rape" at work.

I don't think the university sat on this for 4 years. I think it was dismissed/given up on by the complaintant, then brought up again recently and was approached with the new rules in place. 

MGlobules

January 30th, 2014 at 2:51 PM ^

http://www.washtenawwatchdogs.com/4/post/2013/08/the-cover-up-of-the-ar…

Procedurally, I don't think the U got this very wrong. But Gibbons and Lewan should not have been allowed to keep playing. The standard has to be higher than "okay, you're not a criminal." The guy's semen and vaginal tearing--threats of more rape --should clearly be enough. 

mgobaran

January 30th, 2014 at 2:58 PM ^

Thats the article I reference. Yepp...

And idk man. I think if it paints a bad picture on anyone (and I am guessing there is a bad picture already painted) it has to go on the university more than the football program. It was brought up, looked into, and cleared. It's no different than the Jameis Winston thing. The school just decided to do something the law is unable to do. Expel a kid based on 51% sure of guilt vs. legal ramifications if 100% guilty. 

IMO, it wouldn't have been hard to kick either kid off the team. This happened in 2009, when both were RSing. And even the 2010 season, in which you had a kicker that was so bad RichRod was going for it on 4th and 10 from the 20 yard line, and a false start prone LT who was a converted DL, and no where near the status of Jake Long successor that he is now. 

Those are the type of guys you boot off a team if they do something wrong. Obvs, under Rich Rods watch, the team came to the conclusion that they didn't do anything to warrant that.

El Jeffe

January 30th, 2014 at 2:17 PM ^

This post has been up for over an hour and I still don't have in my possession a picture of that frog with shopped wings on its... cheek... thingys.

Why even bother having an internet at all?

Bodogblog

January 30th, 2014 at 2:56 PM ^

a dozen years from now when Brian is screaming to the heavens in continuous pain that the mgofrog has in fact become the officialy University of Michigan mascot, due solely to its initial appearance here on mgoblog.  He is featured on ESPN's Gameday weekly, children love him, and he wins half exactly of the faux push-up contests with ND's fighting irishfrog (they'll be back on the schedule then)

Frazier was abysmal in that game last night.  Totally choking on free throws, committing TO's.  Some of it was Craft, a lot of it was a kid shrinking in a big environment.  Newbill was stones

Come On Down

January 30th, 2014 at 2:27 PM ^

but the next paragraph of FERPA after the one quoted in the post says this:

For the purpose of this paragraph, the final results of any disciplinary proceeding- (i) shall include only the name of the student, the violation committed, and any sanction imposed by the institution on that student; and (ii) may include the name of any other student, such as a victim or witness, only with the written consent of that other student.

Could this be a basis for the university's claim to secrecy?

oldhackman

January 30th, 2014 at 2:34 PM ^

  Will Heininger is a brave young man for coming forward, and an articulate spokesman for the subject of student athletes' stress and mental health.  We all should remember him before ever posting a comment about the performance of a 20 year old juggling school, the team, and whatever else is going on in his or her life.

travesty

January 30th, 2014 at 4:35 PM ^

One of the things CAPA is fighting for is better treatment for these sorts of issues

But I don't see specifically what this has to do with athletics.  I knew a couple of classmates when I was an undergrad in Ann Arbor who struggled mightily with these sorts of issues, too.  What about them?

I think CAPA needs to do a better job of distinguishing athletic issues from more general life issues.

Ed Shuttlesworth

January 30th, 2014 at 5:37 PM ^

"For the purpose of this paragraph, the final results of any disciplinary proceeding- (i) shall include only the name of the student, the violation committed, and any sanction imposed by the institution on that student; and (ii) may include the name of any other student, such as a victim or witness, only with the written consent of that other student."

Putting on the ol' lawyer hat, "the violation committed" could be interpreted broadly to include some or all of the facts underpinning it.  It obviously would include something like, "Gibbons was expelled from the university because of the finding that he engaged in sexual contact without consent with another student so severe that it created a hostile environment."

The school and AD are using the privacy provisions as a shield here, clearly.  They are absolutely not forbidden from commenting at all.  That's ridiculous.

MarqueeView

January 30th, 2014 at 6:09 PM ^

This was about to be a real depressing post with all the Gibbons talk when... very slowly, parting the muck as he went, ascended a maize and blue amphibian, whose eye burned with the kindness and intensity of a slimy buddha. ALL HAIL MGOFROG, OUR NEW SWAMP OVERLORD!!!

brendan who?

Bando Calrissian

January 30th, 2014 at 9:12 PM ^

Speaking of who knew what and when...

http://michigandaily.com/article/gibbons-document-faxed-athletic-depart…

“December 19 is whenever the letter was sent and the kid came to talk with the Athletic Department,” said Athletic Department spokesman Dave Ablauf in a phone interview with the Daily on Wednesday.

He later added: “That could have been the time that Brendan Gibbons talked to coach Hoke.”

...

The document was sent at 4:02 p.m. on Dec.19 from a fax number associated with the football program. Gibbons signed the document, waiving his right to appeal the sanction. It’s not clear from the markings on the document who received the fax transmission.

The letter was faxed from the offices of the football program four days before Hoke told reporters at a Dec. 23 press conference that Gibbons would not travel to the Buffalo Wild Wings Bowl in Tempe, Ariz. due to a “family matter.” It’s not clear whether Hoke was involved in the Dec. 19 meeting described by Ablauf.