Rawls if he can hang onto it, I'd guesss
mikel796
History
- Member for
- 1 year 30 weeks
- Blog
- View recent blog entries
Karma
- Current value
- 1
Recent Comments
| Date | Title | Body |
|---|---|---|
| 6 weeks 5 hours ago | Weak... |
really weak. Should have led to a suspension. Period. |
| 6 weeks 5 hours ago | boy... |
I just don't get it. I live in EL...and they were giving me crap about Stonum last fall...now this? I don't know how Izzo gets away with it.... |
| 6 weeks 3 days ago | Amen! |
Hoke's, Bielien's, and Mattison's on the house! |
| 8 weeks 2 days ago | Heading to... |
Lincoln. Booked hotel in January. Visited West Lafayette and Champaign the last two years...looking forward seeing Lincoln. |
| 11 weeks 1 day ago | Where's the love? |
For Atwater Brewery? To me they have the best beer in the state! |
| 12 weeks 1 day ago | Real nice idea... |
I like the following: 1) Limit to men's basketball, football, hockey players (no teams, no plays, no mascots, no kittens, no muppets, etc. will be eligible). 2) First year of voting: All players from those sports who has used up their eligibility (starting with those who graduated/used up eligibility in fall '04/winter or spring '05) are on the ballot. Also, eligible would be any coach who no longer coaches for the university and left/was fired/retired post 2005. 3) All subsequent years of voting (maybe make May the voting/inducting month) are based on those who used their eligibility the previous fall or that winter/spring. Also eligible in subsequent years, will be all those that were previously eligible, not voted in, but were named on at least 50% of ballots in the previous year. Also, eligible would be any coach who no longer coaches for the university and left/was fired/retired post 2005 plus received at least 50% of the vote the previous year. 4) All eligible persons being named on at least 85% of ballots would be enshrined. There would be no size requirement for any class. Let's get this done. |
| 17 weeks 1 day ago | 22-9 is my guess... |
Wins: IU, @NEB, ILL, PUR, PSU Losses: @ohio Toss Ups: @MSU, ohio, @NW, @ILL I think they get one of the toss ups to get to 22-9 (12-6 in the B1G). Which I guess will get them a first round B1G tournament bye, then win their first game, and toss up on second, so I would say 23-10 overall. Probable 5th seed in Big Dance. |
| 19 weeks 6 days ago | I am loving this thread.... |
but I am not sure why? |
| 24 weeks 1 day ago | Not so fast... |
I know we lose Martin, RVB, and Molk....but still get 16/17 starters back (if you include Stonum as a starter). I'd say that's pretty good...especially when one of them is a senior quarterback! MSU has13 starters back (5 on offense...they get decimated at WR and QB...plus 8 on D). I'd say with a new QB and our senior QB...we should be in good position to break the skid against them. Alabama scares me....but after looking into it....I am not sure how much. They have 13 starters (assuming only Richardson leaves but they might have more) coming back (7 on O and 6 on D)....and 28 back from their two deep. We have (by my count) 36 back from our two deep....plus a good class coming in and last years class will have another year under their belts. If the Dline potential problems can be solved (come on, Big Will!)....I think next year has a chance to be as good record wise but better in terms of Big Ten Championship. Brian has been saying we need to get to 2013 before being back....but I am beginning to think otherwise. |
| 24 weeks 4 days ago | I would say this |
thread isn't as moronic as your tagline. |
