Who has the advantage on roster depth?

Submitted by mgoblue78 on January 5th, 2024 at 3:47 PM

This is prompted by watching ESPN's pregame coverage this afternoon which was showing all the injuries Penix incurred at IU. Amazing comeback and a formidable opponent.

But it got me thinking, who has better depth if anyone goes out during the game. I'm confident that we do. Michigan is better equipped if someone goes down on DLine, OLine, secondary, linebacker, RB, receiver. But what about QB? I think we still have a path to victory with our backups, even if that path is the PSU second half. Without Penix, I'm pretty sure the Huskies are completely lost.

That being said, I want everyone one both sides at full strength so there's no excuses explaining away our win.

Thoughts?

Go Blue.

 

BlockM

January 5th, 2024 at 3:52 PM ^

I think you're correct that we have superior depth, but depth is almost never 1 for 1. If Penix or JJ get injured, that team is in a real tough spot. Penix is *more* important for Washington, but it's not like if JJ gets hurt Penix has to leave the game too. 

Play flat out, hope no one gets hurt.

MGlobules

January 5th, 2024 at 4:00 PM ^

What if next year, Jim and co. just decide to make Orji the starter and run the triple option? Have one of the younger passing quarterbacks come in for change-of-pace downs? Have, like, a fleet of fast-footed wide-bodied backs, a complete Fritz Crisler-style circus in the backfield, freak the f out of the football fraternity once more?

Hotel Putingrad

January 5th, 2024 at 3:54 PM ^

The two most veteran teams in college football going at it. The way it should be.

I don't think Dillon will play, so that's a fairly equal trade off from losing Zinter and Benny.

It'll be hilarious when Giles Jackson catches the winning touchdown pass.

The Harbaughnger

January 5th, 2024 at 3:55 PM ^

Washington without Penix would be an insurmountable loss imo.

Dillon Johnson is supposedly still expected to play, but highly unlikely he's anywhere near 100%.

So if Penix goes down and Johnson is much less explosive, I just can't...finish this sentence.

MichFan1997

January 5th, 2024 at 4:03 PM ^

I won't pretend to be an expert on the Washington depth chart. However, I will point this out. On the game winning play, Michigan didn't have McGregor, Harrell, Jenkins, or Paige on the field because our defense is so loaded that some people have to leave the field on every play. 

GRBluefan

January 5th, 2024 at 4:05 PM ^

Not to sound overconfident, because I'm not, but given the way we play and our relative strengths as an offense, I truly believe we would be 100% fine if we had to rely on an Orji-led offense.  Lean heavily into the run game, incorporate a good dose of QB power, occasional PAP, and I think we'd move the ball just fine.

Perkis-Size Me

January 5th, 2024 at 5:58 PM ^

They absolutely have more depth at wideout. 

I’m not sure the same can be said anywhere else. They may have a better starting 5 on OL, but Michigan has A LOT of guys who can play on the line, and guys who aren’t starting here who would be starting on most teams in the Big Ten if they went there.

Maybe QB if they have some seasoned guy behind Penix, but as long as neither QB gets injured that doesn’t really matter. 

PopeLando

January 5th, 2024 at 5:58 PM ^

Washington.

If JJ goes down, I’d bet anything that our offense goes vanilla, with the passing game being largely shelved.

If Penix goes down, I’d bet anything the Washington offense stays wide open, maybe becoming a “chuck it up to Odunze”-fest.

[I’m trying hard to stay positive, and tbh I think Washington can and should be run on, but the Harbaugh Lizard Brain scares me.]