trueblueintexas

July 23rd, 2019 at 5:29 PM ^

I saw this and as I scrolled through each section the same thought kept popping into my head.."Michigan would have been top 3 on this list when I was growing up".

Yes, I'm old. Feel free to play on my lawn, I can't chase you down anymore.

Blau

July 23rd, 2019 at 5:32 PM ^

Not to be that guy but even for a two-sentence OP, that was hard to read.

In regards to the positions, RR and Hoke did not develop talent well enough that we could've stuck out at any position. A lot of regression happened there. I'd also like to see non-traditional positions posted i.e. Viper LB, dual-threat QB, H-back, etc...

Sllepy81

July 23rd, 2019 at 5:33 PM ^

They count Krenzel and Smith at OSU...well then we count Ruddock, Navarre, Henson. Pryor is a receiver so Devin Gardner WR and Denard Robinson was a RB. Leaves us with Brady, Henne, Griese vs Barrett, Haskins. 

 

Joke list is joke list.

Stringer Bell

July 23rd, 2019 at 5:36 PM ^

Their rankings are bizarre.  All of the QBs USC produced except Palmer did jack in the NFL so how does that make them QB U?  Half of OSU's QBs turn into WRs so how are they anywhere near the top 10?

 

Also definitely feel like we should be on DL and DB list.  I mean, we produced probably the greatest DB of all time

Alumnus93

July 24th, 2019 at 9:27 AM ^

STOP THE PRESS....

For those fans too young to know here... there was a time when we were QB U.   There was a stretch of seven years that contained my last few years, where we had six or so NFL QBs on the roster at one time.      If I remember right, it was the tail end of Moeller, for five years going forward.  

Grbac, Brady, Griese, Driesbach,  Henson, Henne,  and another  (Guitierrez?)  There may have been another few !   Either way, not even USC could claim this.     All of them played in the NFL, and all of them started a game maybe except one.   Match that folks...   Lloyd did a fine job getting QBs, and it have continued with Mallett, but RR spread killed it, and with RR here, USC did take the lead for a period. Now I believe it is Georgia in the top spot, and we are gaining on them with the progress Jim has made.  

WE were QB U... and Harbaugh is getting back to that.  

 

 

Harball sized HAIL

July 23rd, 2019 at 6:26 PM ^

Without investing too much time reading through all that it appears they value how many players were drafted from a school and how high they were drafted over what their success was at the next level.

Worcester Wolverine

July 23rd, 2019 at 7:13 PM ^

All caveats about the general shittiness of this list and weirdness of this OP apply. But still, how do you design a metric that takes a program that produced a number of high-profile NFL failures, one promising rookie, and Carson Palmer, to the point that "USC quarterback" became shorthand for bust potential, and calls them QBU?

 

Frank Chuck

July 23rd, 2019 at 7:24 PM ^

That article is a mess.

Granted, this was an ambitious undertaking but I'm confident some precocious middle schoolers could've churned out a better sorting approach with superior analysis.

BroadneckBlue21

July 23rd, 2019 at 8:17 PM ^

Look at how Arkansas made the list with all three players having played at the same time, same years, and years ago. Arkansas is not a RB producing team.

How do guys like Kellen Mond make part of a team justification when the player is still in college and has not done anything  to warrant inclusion on pro development? 

Michigan has Brady, Griese, and Henne—all of whom have had better careers than Louisville QBs as QBs—and add Denard as someone who spent as many years in NFL. 

And Mario Manningham and Jason Avant should be notable names over David Terrell and his failures.  

Mongo

July 23rd, 2019 at 9:12 PM ^

Team to watch for $fraud is Nebraska.  Scott Frost is a win-at-all-cost guy.  His UCF teams were too good to be clean.