HartAttack20

June 27th, 2011 at 6:45 PM ^

Is there a reason we played Lithuania's U20 team with our U19 team? I don't suspect it makes a huge difference, but I'm just wondering what the reasoning behind that is.

rockydude

June 27th, 2011 at 7:09 PM ^

Well, it sucks that we got blown out as a team, but glad to see THJ play so well.

Hang in there, Tim, you guys can snap back from this! We appreciate all of you wearing the red, white, and blue, and representing our country to the world!  :-)

jshclhn

June 27th, 2011 at 9:26 PM ^

I know the team played an opponent a whole year older, and this is not the point of the original post, but why in the world is the USA losing to Lithuania?  Let alone by 29 points?

It used to be that college players from the USA could compete with anyone in the world . . .

Michigan4Life

June 27th, 2011 at 9:45 PM ^

other countries have players to compete with the best of the best. It's not like the 80s or the 90s where USA dominates simply because they have superior athletes/players.  This longer is not the case right now.  Foreign players have professional experience and have played against successful college players in USA.

 

USA just got to oversea and went off to a slow start due to jet lag before coming back strong in the middle of the game.  They dug themselves into a deep hole that they couldn't get out of it.

oriental andrew

June 28th, 2011 at 10:14 AM ^

I think this makes the most sense. Beyond the jetlag, kids in Europe are playing in professional leagues as teenagers.  If you recall one Robin Benzing (another HT to UMHoops), he's a kid from Germany who Beilein was recruiting.  At the age of 19, he had been playing professionally for a year and was a star on Germany's U19 team.  

Raoul

June 28th, 2011 at 10:48 AM ^

If you look at the results of previous FIBA U-19 tournaments, I don't think the trend is as clearcut as you contend. In the last four tournaments, the U.S. squad finished 2nd (1999), 5th (2003) 2nd (2007), and 1st (2009). Are they expected to cakewalk to the gold this year? No. But I'm sure the U.S. team is considered one of the favorites.

Sac Fly

June 27th, 2011 at 9:57 PM ^

From a potential standpoint they can be very good, but right now they are very unproven. This isn't a superstar loaded team, you have alot of young inconsistant players like joe jackson, jeremy lamb and keith appling. It's going to be a work in progress.