UM O-line
September 3rd, 2008 at 9:37 AM ^
September 3rd, 2008 at 9:48 AM ^
September 3rd, 2008 at 11:18 AM ^
September 3rd, 2008 at 11:33 AM ^
Ferrara played on special teams, but not on regular offense. He's listed as an OR with Moosman at right guard for this week. Presumably, if he's ready, Moosman will shift to center (presumption mine).
I thought McAvoy and Molk struggled the most. They really shouldn't have, because Utah's DT's weren't very good. But Utah blitzed some up the middle, probably because we have such young guys in there.
Schilling had a couple horrible plays, but overall he and Ortmann played well on the outside. I'm not sure about Moosman. I didn't notice him playing horribly, but they were getting pressure up the middle, so I guess all three interior guys deserve some blame.
September 3rd, 2008 at 11:58 AM ^
I believe it was sometime in the 4th quarter (possible while we were rallying), but Ortman had a TE next to him with a DE playing in the gap and at the snap of the ball the OLB blitzed wide TE picked him up and Ortman blocked down to help on DT and DE came in free. I believe he thought the TE would pick up the DE but he had to get the blitzing LB. Just lack of time together and communication. Hopefully all will get worked out the more the line plays together.
Hopefully!!
September 3rd, 2008 at 1:11 PM ^
September 3rd, 2008 at 1:24 PM ^
...our offensive line had a combined 15 starts before Saturday. Against Miami they will have 33% more experience than they did before.
They are young and need to keep improving. Schilling, in particular, seemed better than last year. I'm looking forward to the UFR...
September 3rd, 2008 at 1:50 PM ^
September 3rd, 2008 at 1:58 PM ^
September 3rd, 2008 at 2:08 PM ^
September 3rd, 2008 at 2:34 PM ^
In the end I don't think the O-Line stood out particularily one way or the other. If you look at the number of freshmen playing, it is somewhat impressive that it was not much worse. They were decidedly mediocre. And likely they will get better and be aorund for a while...both good things.
September 3rd, 2008 at 3:07 PM ^
While I am waiting for the UFR's to watch cloer the plays that I replayed, and those shown spotlighted last night on BTN showed a complete lack of physicalness from these two. There were plays where they were simply run over and could not even engage their man for a half second.
With as bad as these guys were its hard to evaluate the running backs and even the scheme.
Wont shock me to see Will Campbell starting next year on the O Line, its clear to me that is the biggest weakness, greater then if we have a dual threat qb.
September 3rd, 2008 at 5:49 PM ^
I thought the LT was poor throughout the game be it run or pass. I think it was Ortmann, but I can't even remember any more. RT (presumably Schilling) was meh in the pass block but was worse than awful in the run block. I do agree the WR blocking was terrible, but when Odoms is considered a "small electron" guy, that might explain a lot of it. He's small, he's meant to be a fast guy, not a blocker. As for clemons and hemingway, I can't say I watched closely enough. Mathews put on at least one good block that I saw. Other than that I think he was going deep more often.
My only good note was Carson Butler, while his blocking wasn't particularly good, he didn't get a penalty for bear-hugging anyone.
September 3rd, 2008 at 6:20 PM ^
The only tricks that need to be brought out of hiding is more time together. Fat Chuck demonstrated the wisdom of hashing out a new scheme during a game week last year before they came to AA. They just need more time playing against real competition together.
Linemen need to develop an understanding of what each other is going to do each play given the front they are facing. It has a great deal to do with snaps played. Doing anything tricky that minimizes the number of snaps taken using their standard approach is a waste.
September 3rd, 2008 at 6:37 PM ^
September 6th, 2008 at 2:05 AM ^