Proposed banned terms for both sides of RR argument

Submitted by UMdad on

OK, I can't turn on the radio or the computer without being inundated with terms people throw out ad nauseum without really adding anything new to the discussion.  Whichever side you fall on in the RR discussion, I propose we ban the following words/ phrases.  Feel free to add your own.

Michigan Man - we get it, you still have a picture of Bo in your office.

Uninformed alumni / fanbase - You don't have any more information than everyone else who watched the games this year, I could give a shit how nice your chart looks

MGoBoard
Football

bryemye

November 27th, 2010 at 7:57 PM ^

Uninformed alumni / fanbase - You don't have any more information than everyone else who watched the games this year, I could give a shit how nice your chart looks.

The willful ignorance inherent in that statement is unworthy of this institution. But yeah asshole, I'm sure you can parse every little bit of what happened in a football game just by watching once. I'm sure you can answer the questions going through your head such as "why is our secondary so bad" just by watching the game. Never mind anything behind the scenes.

I hate you.

Joined: 09/14/2009

MGoPoints: 2692

jatlasb

November 27th, 2010 at 7:57 PM ^

The entire RR debate. None of us have any idea what DB is going to do re: Rich Rod. And frankly it's really ruining my mgoblog experience as it just encourages rampant trolling and flaming.

Joined: 08/15/2010

MGoPoints: 811