Michigan Wisconsin Game thread

Submitted by the_big_house 500th on
Alright great second possession and a tied game in Madison! Great throw by Forcier to complete on 3rd and long! 7-7 GO BLUE! LET'S KEEP THIS UP OFFENSE! Defense needs to keep the momentum by making some big stops here!

NOLA Wolverine

November 14th, 2009 at 12:34 PM ^

They need to stop running read plays. Isn't it amazing? Rich rod goes for it, it's the wrong decision. He kicks the field goal, and its the wrong decision. Very lucky block, didn't even get penetration.

PSALM 23 Rod N…

November 14th, 2009 at 12:44 PM ^

Our D is playing well (knock on wood) ...We will knock out their QB, he is playing soft/scared. (Knock on wood). Agreed on the Read Option comment. Run between the tackles, out of the I-Formation.

4godkingandwol…

November 14th, 2009 at 1:01 PM ^

There is this page: http://www.mgoblue.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/coaches-m-footbl.html But it only says their is a quality control person -- which in the case of today it means they are controlling how good our special teams is allowed to play. Edit: did some more digging and found this article: http://www.annarbor.com/sports/michigan-manages-special-teams-the-best-… Interesting.

UM Fan NY

November 14th, 2009 at 12:53 PM ^

just continues to kill themselves. 2 possessions deep in wisconsin territory and we only get 3 points and now we hand them a 1st down on the roughing the punter penalty. we should be up 21-7 with the ball. jesus christ.

Maize and Blue…

November 14th, 2009 at 12:58 PM ^

why give a player a chance to make an aggresive mistake by trying to block the punt. This kids are trying so hard to get that sixth win. Nice hold on BSmith on the TE around with no call leading up to that TD.

PSALM 23 Rod N…

November 14th, 2009 at 1:01 PM ^

I do like us throwing hte ball down field with moderate success. How bout a bootleg or roll out pass, short, high percentage with Denard? Way to go Vincent, we used to have a freshman #2 RB, what was his name? (sarcasm)

4godkingandwol…

November 14th, 2009 at 1:22 PM ^

... I don't like the "conclusive video evidence" stipulation. I find it hard to believe that a human being, at full speed, with extremely limited time to make a hair line decision has better decision making criteria simply because they were "closer" to the action. With multiple video angles, hi definition replay, slow motion, I really think judgement calls should go in favor of the video judge not the onfield one.