Michigan Monday is up

Submitted by Hab on November 18th, 2019 at 10:25 PM

tl; dr  Credit where credit is due, but the jury's still out on whether or how it translates to The Game.

The intro:

Last week I insisted that if Michigan football wants to develop any kind of offensive identity or consistency, they need to take the ball out of Shea Patterson's wee porcelain doll hands and at least try and conjure a reasonable facsimile of a Running Team. My reasoning for this was that Patterson has been overall disappointing as Michigan's signal-caller, and given that the most functional part of their offense had been the running game, it might be smart for Harbaugh and Gattis to stick with what works. This turned out to be extremely dumb.

naters113

November 18th, 2019 at 10:38 PM ^

Yeah I was reading it thinking this is much more biased and snarky than usual without the more intelligent puns used by Gerdman.  He hasn’t posted it yet for this week, I just checked...

MGlobules

November 19th, 2019 at 7:45 AM ^

Well, we've now got a truly multifaceted offense that the team has looked comfortable in running over a four-five week period, and that likely bodes very well for IU and suggests we may be able to give OSU by far their biggest challenge so far this season. 

What bugs me about the Shae criticism from our local overlords is that it's so like the crap criticisms of screechy fans: when the guy isn't godlike on your demand or whim you start popping bponers. This when the guy's basic competency, godlike dimensions or no, is there in black and white in the stats. You guys are supposed to BE the cool heads who notice that despite criticism the guy has been largely successful, despite three systems in three years, etc. Instead you enlist with the screechers. . . and in my view have lost considerable credibility.

You know who you are.