Michigan Is The Better Team: A Group-by-Group Analysis

Submitted by Blake Forum on November 28th, 2021 at 5:28 PM

Coming into this game, every informed Michigan fan or analyst considered Ohio State the better team. There were such stats as S+P-plus and FEI, sure, but there was also, shall we say, the recent history of the rivalry and the fact that the past several years of college football have been dominated and defined by the troika of Bama/Clemson/OSU. The consensus was that beating Ohio State would be a clear upset and might even require luck to the point of flukiness.

You don't need me to tell you that the game itself was neither lucky nor fluky. The snow may have been a bit of luck favoring Michigan, but that was it. The officiating was strikingly fair, with most flags being obvious upon review, and most of OSU's penalties being false starts. And more importantly, Michigan simply flattened Ohio State.

I'm not a stats guy, but I am an experienced college football watcher, and it was clear that the best team won. I challenge anyone to disagree with this head-to-head breakdown of the different units of these two teams at this point in the season. Think of it as "which unit/phase would you want on your team":

Passing offense: Ohio State

Rushing offense: Michigan

Passing defense: Michigan

Rushing defense: Michigan

Special teams: Michigan

In a lot of these cases, the stats backed me up before the game began--i.e., Michigan's FEI special teams score or our superior fancystats and counting stats on defense. That Michigan's rushing attack was so much better than OSU's was perhaps a bit of a surprise, but even OSU partisans in the media (many of whose takes I've gleefully checked in on over the last 24 hours) wouldn't sit here and say that Michigan's rushing attack is anything other than clearly superior to Ohio State's.

The one thing about Ohio State that was believed to be true before kickoff and wasn't called into question during the game is that their passing offense is for real. In particular, their receivers are cyborgs whose absurd catches at key moments kept Ohio State from losing by as many as 40. On that note, let's compare position groups. I'm taking the whole year into account to an extent, but with a massive dose of recency bias. I think that's deserved in this case since this was by far the most significant and revealing game either team has played.

Quarterback: Ohio State

I will always, always, always love Cade McNamara after yesterday. I loved him all season, in fact. He brings a special element as a leader and a cold-blooded assassin who may be the single best quarterback in college football in purely mental terms. Won't get as much credit as he deserves for helping to change the entire culture of a snake-bitten program.

However, Stroud is much more talented, is still a deserving Heisman finalist, and did his best to win this game. He faced a level of pressure and physicality he hadn't seen in his young career, and came away with a nice stat line. It wasn't his fault that his team lost, and a randomly picked neutral coach would almost certainly take him over Cade (unless, perhaps, that coach had the wiring of Jim Harbaugh and valued Cade's intangibles, which are indeed invaluable).

Running back: Michigan

TreVeyon Henderson is very good but is neither the one-man offense that Kenneth Walker III is nor the breaker of spirits that Hassan Haskins is. Haskins alone will go down in myth for this game, and this season, but Corum and Edwards are also special rising stars. Every other OSU back is Just A Guy, if that. Haskins forever.

Receiver: Ohio State

I love our guys but OSU has maybe the best group in CFB history. No exaggeration to say they saved their team from utter humiliation, which is hard to do at a position group so reliant on other players. Michigan *might* be able to compete with their group next year, maybe, if things break our way, but this is the position where OSU excels more than any other program, and this might be their best ever group.

Tight End: Michigan

Does Ohio State even have tight ends? We sure do. One of them is from Ohio. He and his buddy shoved Ohio State into the dirt all game long. Or perhaps All game long. Bet you wish you'd offered him a scholarship, you arrogant losing scarlet and gray losers who lost.

Safety: Michigan

Ohio State's defensive backs are Just Guys. Ours made a bunch of key plays, from freshmen Rod Moore (another Ohio guy the losing team of losers that lost should've offered) to super-senior Brad Hawkins. Though Dax didn't always win his matchup with Smith-Njigba, he was a key part of a gameplan designed to prevent big plays. Even without Dax and Hawkins, I'm excited for this position next year.

Cornerback: Michigan

It feels impossible that Michigan has better corners than OSU, after what we saw last season and what we know of our rival's recruiting chops. But we do. Ohio State's guys are Just Guys, and the best of them lost his cool and earned two completely valid flags at big moments in the game.

Meanwhile, Gray and Turner II were phenomenal in this game. They forced the best WRs in the country to make circus catch after circus catch, made crucial tackles in space, and had some hard-fought PBUs. Pay Steve Clinkscale his damn money and get these guys some NIL deals with Subway or whatever.

Linebacker: Michigan

Our guys still have a lot to learn--aside from Josh Ross, who turned in a great game that you know felt especially good for a Michigan guy with family ties to the program. The disastrous mistakes we feared didn't come to pass. This group was solid.

Meanwhile Ohio State's linebackers, um. They sure do have some guys who nominally play linebacker, and curiously, their 247 profiles suggest that lots of other teams wanted them to play linebacker. I'm as shocked as you are. Look, you guys. You're allowed to recruit linebackers. You don't have to play 7 defensive backs. Also you're allowed to tell them where to go and what to do. Though it must be said: Hats off to Maize and Blue mole Al Washington for playing the long game and helping us get a dub in a season where we were in conference title contention.

Defensive line: Michigan

If you include edge/OLBs as defensive line... I mean, in that case, Michigan has easily one of the best units in the country. So I'll do that. But our tackles also out-played their tackles and embarrassed the vaunted OSU offensive line. The whole unit got better all year, crescendoing to a convincing domination of the best offense in the country. 2.1 yards rushing, 4 sacks, a seemingly infinite succession of quarterback pressures speak for themselves. Aidan for Heisman, Ojabo for Prime Minister of Scotland.

Again, it feels absurd that I'd rather have Michigan's defensive line than Ohio State's, coming off a total defensive collapse last year, but that's the state of play. Ohio State's front is as soft as tissue paper. Move to the Big 12 if you wanna play like that, you wine and cheese goofballs. 

Special teams: Michigan

Henning is one of the unsung heroes of this game, routinely giving us good field position. Robbins and Moody were money all year but hilariously weren't really needed in this game. Meanwhile Ohio State seems to struggle with fielding kickoffs despite having a five-star WR back there.

Conclusion:

This game, and this chaotic season across college football, should lead to a winding down of the idea that the top recruiting powers are simply too good to be touched by teams even one step below them in terms of recruiting rankings. We've had a few years now of top spread passing attacks being dominant and looking unstoppable, but we saw Mike MacDonald--a first-time coordinator--slow this year's best iteration down to the point of looking mortal and uncertain. Meanwhile, perhaps due to recruiting and developing guys to stop Bama and Clemson passing attacks, Ohio State's defense is full of soft, dainty, confused guys who got shoved into the dirt by an elite, old-school running attack. 

Yes, it's just one game. Yes, my analysis is littered with recency bias and eye test and blah blah blah. But we all saw what we saw. It wasn't a fluke. It wasn't luck. It wasn't even lesser players playing out of their minds while better ones had an off game. A lot of Michigan's 3-stars or low 4-stars--such as Ojabo, All, Moore, Zinter, etc.--are simply better football players than many of Ohio State's high 4-stars and 5-stars. That's a testament to evals and development and in-game coaching and locker room culture and everything else, and it led to the game we just watched. Michigan went out there and shoved Ohio State's defense around while throwing a series of monkey wrenches into their defense. We had the better team on Saturday, and that should give hope to every team that can't simply plug in highly rated recruits and roll the ball out there. 

Blake Forum

November 28th, 2021 at 5:34 PM ^

Ahhhh I forgot to add offensive line! Sorry, fellas. You deserve better than that. So, obviously:

Michigan. By a country mile. Ohio State got dominated by our front, and you shoved their front into the dirt. I wish I could edit my post to reflect this sinful error, but you have my eternal gratitude. #SlabFive forever

UWSBlue

November 28th, 2021 at 5:58 PM ^

While the OSU glow is still upon us, I just want to point out that Brad Hawkins had offers from OSU, Florida & Auburn but committed to UofM in 2015, busted his ass to get his grades up at a prep school in 2016 and enrolled in 2017. Kid worked like crazy, got into the school and onto the field and Saturday in his final home game, played perhaps the best game of his career.

End of rant.

kehnonymous

November 28th, 2021 at 6:14 PM ^

Let’s also not lose sight of him likely literally singlehandedly saving at least one TD when he tripped up Henderson on (I think?) a screen run.  That possibly goes for six, and although you might think it might not have mattered in a 15 pt win, them getting a home run instead of working for their scores probably changes the tenor of that game big time.

PeteM

November 28th, 2021 at 6:00 PM ^

I think the reason for the skepticism about Michigan's chances before the game was that Ohio State was better in every or most areas, but that they were good enough in most areas and their passing game was elite. I'm sure the weather helped, but our pass rush (and overall defense) were incredible yesterday as was our ability to hold serve whenever they scored.

Blake Forum

November 28th, 2021 at 6:02 PM ^

Fair enough regarding things like defensive backs and some other groups. But I'd say most informed neutral observers would've said that, for instance, Ohio State had the better offensive line. And they seem to almost always have the better defensive line than us, even given how good we know our edge guys to be. It was eye-opening to see Michigan simply smash them in the trenches on both sides of the ball. Eye-opening and oh-so-sweet

Blue Vet

November 28th, 2021 at 6:17 PM ^

"I'm not a stats guy, but I am an experienced college football watcher"

Tomorrow this is going on my resume —

Other skills: Experienced college football watcher

Bo Harbaugh

November 28th, 2021 at 6:17 PM ^

Great analysis.

Per your points on recruiting, 1 game does not a trend make...as much as I'd love this to be the beginning of a UM streak against OSU and dominance in the B1G.

We need as many 4 and 5 stars as we can get, given the staff likes them. There's a reason OSU and BAMA have are in the playoff almost every year, and it's not because of Xs and Os.

Blake Forum

November 28th, 2021 at 6:19 PM ^

To be clear, I'd love to see Michigan pull in more top 100 and even top 10 recruits. But I also want them to trust their own evals when they believe guys are underrated, because wow did we see a lot of those pay off this year. Haskins and Ojabo lead the way, but also Zinter, Moore, All, Anthony...

WolverineMan1988

November 28th, 2021 at 6:26 PM ^

I’m as thrilled about the win as anybody, but this post is littered with recency bias. The only fact that matters is that Michigan was very clearly better than OSU yesterday. You put that game on a neutral field or in Columbus on a different day and the outcome COULD be different. It doesn’t matter. We were better yesterday and that’s what counts. OSU has been better in The Game for far too long. For the first time in a long time, we outplayed and outcoached them. Now let’s use that confidence of knowing that we CAN do it to build something truly special. As Harbaugh said and I hope everyone within the program believes, this is just the beginning. You know OSU ain’t going anywhere, so let’s all strap in and prepare for war. We all want OSU to truly respect and fear us again. So I hope this team is already mentally preparing for 2022 in the Shoe. We haven’t beaten OSU at their place since 2000. That needs to change. End of rant.

Vote_Crisler_1937

November 28th, 2021 at 6:54 PM ^

I suspect the weather is part of the reason Harbaugh wants the offense as he does. It’s not crazy to think the Fall in Michigan, or anywhere a Big Ten team plays, could have weather that inhibits a spread passing attack. 

Shirley, Ryan Day knows that too and OSU’s rushing offense is no slouch! 
 

I’m just saying “luck” of weather isn’t as much “luck” as say a fumble bounce. 

BlueInGreenville

November 28th, 2021 at 7:08 PM ^

Oddly, this analysis would be common sense to national commentators at this point (who all seem to think Michigan is the better team) but will be hard for Michigan fans to fathom.  We're so scarred by the 2018 game and the losses in recruiting battles that we can't see the reality in the moment.  Michigan has always had the athletes to hang with OSU, we've just been held back by coaching and mental mistakes.  Something changed this year, and *poof* we're title contenders.  

The game on Saturday was never David vs. Goliath, it was Goliath in a blue shirt versus a Goliath in a red shirt that is an inch taller, 7 pounds heavier and has a recent history of better execution.  The Blue Goliath moves on, maybe with championships on the way.

UMForLife

November 28th, 2021 at 7:18 PM ^

Very good analysis by the way. I really enjoyed it.

I personally thought OSU was given way too much credit because of two things, after they lost to Oregon: 1) Their turnaround on Defense, 2) Their dismantling of MSU. Against Michigan, they were given the added benefit of not losing to Michigan in a while and transitive property of how we lost to MSU.

Alex was objective in his analysis before The Game. I can't say the same about many.

It was clear we had the better running game but everyone worried about our Tackles not holding up even though there was evidence that OSU DEs we're not the best.

It was also clear that our secondary is way better and probably better than PSU's. Look what we did to Dotson. Yet, everyone wanted to believe that we were not as good as PSU's secondary. Evidence was there but BPONE happened. OSU WRs earned it and they were who we thought they were. But I think they got lucky with one TD that should have been reviewed. Shitty refs and shitty coverage by Fox. Regardless, we had the best defense they would have faced because of our two DEs, but everyone was worried our DTs (who played well by the way). 

It is hard to get over the hump but we did. I think the narrative before the game was too much because of the history but not necessarily an objective one based on this season.

 

 

DetroitDan

November 28th, 2021 at 7:44 PM ^

This game was comparable to the Michigan v Northern Illinois game earlier in the year.  Ohio State's offense was better, but defensively neither could stop Michigan on drive after drive after drive after drive after drive.  Northern Illinois came back from their shellacking at the hands of Michigan and stands atop the MAC West.  OSU - NIU would be a good bowl matchup, doncha think?

CWood2

November 28th, 2021 at 9:25 PM ^

What year has OSU had a better WR room? They have 3 guys that will likely go in the first round of the NFL draft. They had another guy transfer due to playing time that is now the best WR on Alabama. And their highest rated recruit of them all (Fleming) is still on deck, and could conceivably have the highest overall upside. When did they have it better than that? When did anyone have it better than that? 

Nemesis

November 29th, 2021 at 10:24 AM ^

I am delighted with the win.  But if we played OSU 10 times in the next 10 weeks, we might win 1 or 2 of those games.  OSU is still on another level. 

 

They are far more likely to have a solution to our run game than we are to have a solution for their pass game.