Farnn

July 24th, 2009 at 9:49 PM ^

I'd say lending a house about to be torn down to a local fire department should be grounds for some form of deduction. Nothing in this world is free, and I'd say this service provided to a government institution should result in some form of payment. The $200k or so he got seems a bit much though, it should be a flat rate rather than basing it on the value of the house to be burned.

ZooWolverine

July 24th, 2009 at 10:05 PM ^

I'm no tax attorney (nor any other form of lawyer) but I wonder if the value of the deduction shouldn't be whatever the fire department would have paid to practice on something else. It's at least pretty obvious that he got some value out of it, it's probably not cheap to hire someone to knock your house down. I must admit it's a creative way to take your house down and help someone else at the same time.

tricks574

July 25th, 2009 at 3:52 AM ^

He could have sold the house right? If he could have sold it, and instead donated it...it would be a pretty dick move on the irs's part, especially if it has been a common practice to offer a deduction for it. Even if he couldn't sell it, he deserves at least some amount of compensation for donating a house, at least a duffel bag or commemorative t-shirt.

Farnn

July 25th, 2009 at 7:54 AM ^

I got the impression he was building a new house on the property and so it was going to be demolished anyway. Instead of paying to have it taken down he was, in essence, getting paid to have it taken down for him by the fire department. $200k seems like a large sum for allowing the fire department to burn down a building that was going to be destroyed anyway.

Farnn

July 25th, 2009 at 1:29 AM ^

I'm not stating that he shouldn't get a deduction, just that $200k seems over the top. The value of the deduction should be relative to the value the fire department gets out of it as those above had said. I somehow think that value isn't in the hundreds of thousands.

In reply to by MrVociferous

mejunglechop

July 24th, 2009 at 11:47 PM ^

Whatever happened to Big Ten solidarity? Q: If you were to discover that the IRS is actually the diabolical invention of a football coach who would you first suspect? A: Nick Saban. I rest my case.

VAWolverine

July 24th, 2009 at 10:46 PM ^

that Les Miles was in line to purchase Kirk Herstreit's house if he did not burn it down. Also planning to live in the same neighborhood was Jon Tenuta, who was interested in working with Miles in the Department of Defense. Miles eventually turned down Herbstreit's offer by saying "I'm staying in Louisiana and will live in my damn strong house here."

Jeffro

July 25th, 2009 at 2:57 AM ^

"the real question is whether Lee Corso is getting to the age where he’s burning down houses just because he’s totally gone senile."

5150

July 25th, 2009 at 11:17 AM ^

I'm not entirely convinced that this was not in fact the case with Herbie's house. Foreclosed and condemned. I believe this is quite common in Buckeye circles. Not sayin', just sayin'. I kid, I kid. I know ESPN is watching the internet like a hawk right now and wish to avoid any appearance of impropriety.

Brodie

July 25th, 2009 at 3:15 PM ^

For one, I imagine Herbie lives in one of the many McMansion filled suburbs of Columbus... so is it reasonable to expect his local fire department to have many condemned or foreclosed homes to practice on? And would a small, old brick and mortar house really be good practice for a fire department who would routinely need to enter bigger, newer houses?