Iowa Snowflakes: The Coaching

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on October 2nd, 2022 at 4:00 AM

This will be the thread for hot takes regarding the overall coaching performance. 

bamf_16

October 2nd, 2022 at 7:41 AM ^

Kinnick and Camp Randall… two B1G West locations where you don’t complain about how you won.

 

Though as mentioned elsewhere, I think the coaching and playcalling was great for 2.5 quarters. I wasn’t a fan of the pass on the 2nd to last drive, nor the Corum dive on 3rd and 1. Though to be fair, I wanted that play when they broke the huddle, but seeing the Iowa defense, wanted to shift out of it.

 

Other than that, I thought the coaching was great. I’d like more of a pass rush, but I don’t blame Minter for not dialing up more and more complex blitzes. 

 

(And I thought the 2008 Michigan offense was bad…)

rc90

October 2nd, 2022 at 8:40 AM ^

wanted that play when they broke the huddle, but seeing the Iowa defense, wanted to shift out of it.

Yes. i wonder if JJ has that kind of freedom. If he does, then that's a misread, because it was pretty clear the Iowa defense was only concerned with one play.

TheCube

October 1st, 2022 at 3:18 PM ^

Individual talents of JJ, Donovan and Mike are keeping these coaches employed. Game could have easily been a loss running Corum 30 million times. 

TheCube

October 1st, 2022 at 3:43 PM ^

JJ and Edwards making something out of nothing got Michigan the 2nd touchdown. We’d be sweating bullets if not for that. 
 

Corum is a brilliant talent, yet all that domination yielded 13 points in the first half. 
 

Maybe this is 2021 redux where they keep it simple for much of the year until MSU/PSU. 

stephenrjking

October 1st, 2022 at 3:28 PM ^

They were gaining 5 basically every time they handed the ball off through three quarters. Not handing the ball off would be *insane*. 

Honestly, people are totally losing perspective here because Michigan had two rough fourth-quarter drives (one of which started in the shadow of their own end zone) when they were trying to run clock out. I don't like the call to run Corum into a stacked LOS on 3rd-and-1 either, but that doesn't nullify three quarters of playcalling that was not only adequate, but exceptional. 

stephenrjking

October 1st, 2022 at 3:51 PM ^

It was really only an issue a couple of times; most of the time Michigan was humming at at the LOS with plenty of time. 

That one time was during the 2-minute drill. Then there was one occurance in the second half.

This is a lot better than the pre-Gattis days. Michigan actively runs hurry-up-to-the-line now and I like it. 

bamf_16

October 2nd, 2022 at 7:48 AM ^

Serious question…

 

Why do people write stuff like this, assuming that if the game were going differently the coaching and play-calling wouldn’t reflect it? Like if running Corum 30 million times wasn’t working they wouldn’t do something else?

 

We saw this same nonsense after the Washington win last year. We all went into the game nervous, then somehow bitched that they ran too much.

Buy Bushwood

October 2nd, 2022 at 9:18 AM ^

WTF?  There was almost no chance at any point after 20-0 that this game was a loss. And it was good coaching to get to 20-0.  A loss at that point would have required Spencer the Rock Petras to drive his team 3x in 20 minutes for touchdowns.  When is the last time Iowa did that against anyone with a pulse, much less with Petras and no receivers or good running backs?  The coaches played the high-percent scenario that Petras simply couldn't do that, and in the end it wasn't even close. If they had employed this strategy against OSU, then sure, be pissed.  But it was played calmly and perfectly, and Iowa, as any betting person would have predicted, wasn't up to it.  

wildbackdunesman

October 1st, 2022 at 5:29 PM ^

I get that, but there is a good chance Iowa misses 1 of the 2 point conversions or even Ferentz kicks the PAT knowing him.

I'd still prefer to get up by 21 if possible. I thought that Harbaugh made a mistake to kick the PAT at the time, but definitely thought it was the wrong choice with Iowa down just 13 and having a first and goal with plenty of time left.

wildbackdunesman

October 2nd, 2022 at 9:33 AM ^

I don't know.

If we went for 2 and got it when Iowa scored their TD we'd be up 14 with basically a whole quarter left in the game.

If we went for 2 and missed it when Iowa scored their TD we'd be up 12 with basically a whole quarter left in the game if Iowa kicked a PAT. 11 or 13 if they went for 2.

If we kicked the PAT, which we did, we'd be up 13 with basically a whole quarter left.

With that much time remaining, being up 13 instead of 12 has a negligible advantage.

Being up 14 has a massive advantage over 13.