Indiana parkinggod highlights are up (including McCaffrey 2pt conversion)

Submitted by Chris of Dange… on November 23rd, 2019 at 8:05 PM

If you're just looking for the McCaffrey two-point conversion, it's at 5:18.

https://youtu.be/1x6d4f3Bxxs

 

MGOTokyo

November 23rd, 2019 at 11:02 PM ^

I'm not sure why Dylan hasn't gotten some decent time in these recent blowouts. If he is healthy, it makes no sense. He and the family can't be pleased.

Last year, my (sophomore) daughter (and 2 others) were called up to the Varsity BB squad (still playing in the JV game) and got a few garbage minutes during the season. The final game, the team was losing by about 30 (50-20) and none of the 3 were put in the the game.  I had no answer when she asked me why she didn't play, other than to say that her coach (OF A TEAM THAT FINISHED 3-20!) was an ass. I lost all respect for her after that. 

A Lot of Milk

November 23rd, 2019 at 8:15 PM ^

Looks like it was a direct snap to McCaffrey from the one man in front of him with the bulk of the o-lined up to his left with their being some frippery motion behind the line suggesting he was going to throw it over to that side, which would explain the misstep by the IU player. But obviously it's a designed keep all the way. Works great when you know your QB can beat the defender matched on him. Would not recommend running this play against OSU

MaizeBlueA2

November 23rd, 2019 at 8:19 PM ^

Lol how is it "obviously" a designed keep when there's a guy right in front of McCaffrey going out for a passes and he completely misses an obviously block any one of us could've made DIRECTLY in front of him. He's not even looking to block.

Even if it was a pass option, I was rewinding trying to figure out why he wouldn't block the only person on that side of the field anyway. 

Regardless. Nice call. Nice execution. 

A Lot of Milk

November 23rd, 2019 at 8:34 PM ^

Oh I just meant it was obvious based on the way the play was executed. Like there was no way to tell it was a designed keep before or during the play, but once he grabbed the snap he made his cut right away, meaning that there wasn't a read for Dylan, it was just a straight keep. I think it's a very well designed play, much like the fake xp against Ruggers in 16

Gobluecheese

November 23rd, 2019 at 10:52 PM ^

I don’t think it was necessarily a designed run only. Indiana had 4 defenders right of center, and UM had 4 eligible receivers including the snapper. As Dylan takes the snap and runs to his right, the defender to the left of center takes himself out of the play by rushing up field, leaving the 4 defenders to cover 4 receivers plus the qb. Had one of those defenders come off the receiver to make the tackle, Dylan can just flip it to the receiver for the score

I also would not be surprised if there was a secondary call set up if IU had an additional defender to the right of center, but we’ll probably never know that. 

A Lot of Milk

November 23rd, 2019 at 8:11 PM ^

Well

That was kinda the same shot we got before. Was hoping for a different angle or at least the full play itself

Hard to ask ESPN to have one of their 100 cameras rolling on the game they're broadcasting, I know

TruBluMich

November 23rd, 2019 at 8:12 PM ^

Just shows what they showed during the game, McCaffrey running the ball.  I thought for sure an official had to of blown the whistle because everyone was just looking at him.

jmblue

November 23rd, 2019 at 8:12 PM ^

Was that the "swinging gate" that Oregon likes to run, or did under Chip Kelly, anyway?

You put most of your guys on one hash but the center, holder and one blocker are on the other.  If the numbers work out, you snap it.  If not, the three go back to the other hash and just kick a PAT.

spider-sal

November 23rd, 2019 at 8:44 PM ^

There were about 10 things I wanted to see a replay on but apparently espn had more important shit to do. Sounds like the LT was hurt really bad, and that sucks, but I really wanted to see want happened despite how bad they said it was. Anyone have a description?

vanarbor

November 23rd, 2019 at 8:48 PM ^

Yeah I was pretty furious that they didn't replay the Dax INT. Not just because it was an interception, but because I wasn't sure if the ball hit the ground.

Apparently showing a minor injury on the replay multiple times was more important.