Enjoy Life

December 29th, 2009 at 11:33 AM ^

"About $130,000 of the $1.02 billion came from federal stimulus-package awards. U-M researchers have been awarded more than $90 million in stimulus grants so far, but the bulk of those funds will be spent in the current and next fiscal years."

Hemlock Philosopher

December 29th, 2009 at 12:03 PM ^

It's sad to see the state having such issues, but it's great to see UM can continue to expand research efforts despite the negative environment in Michigan right now. Strong research and development is a great source of wealth; hopefully the U can turn the state around soon. I very much want to come home.

MaizeSombrero

December 29th, 2009 at 12:12 PM ^

1. Not OT. 2. If you post a link, please provide context to what you are linking to. For example, in this case, you would write about how much Michigan spends on research. Then, you would provide a link.

hokiewolf

December 29th, 2009 at 7:04 PM ^

That survey doesn't get a lot of attention (except from schools whose position it improves). Most research rankings are based off the NSF survey. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/showsrvy.cfm?srvy_CatID=4&srvy_Seri=12#av… The 2008 numbers are late, but the 2007 data is available, sliced and diced, here: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf09303/content.cfm?pub_id=3871&id=2 Probably table 33 is the most useful. John Hopkins crushes everyone, but all Big10 members are in the top 44. MSU is last. For the purposes of expansion, Pitt looks the best. Rutgers is #57.

jb5O4

December 29th, 2009 at 1:36 PM ^

That has alot to do with the state as a whole hurting with government funding. This past year the state proposed the idea of cutting UofM off completely and making them go private. That is the case at all schools across the country. I went to another school for a semester a while back and they gave me $0 in financial aid. I had to borrow everything to cover expenses.

WolverineEagle

December 29th, 2009 at 9:39 PM ^

A firm hired by the state mentioned the privation of UM as a option. Granholm quickly dismissed the idea as it would require a constitutional amendment and would be immensely unpopular among the residents of the state.