CC: Matt Entz (or Matt Entz Type)

Submitted by Mercury Hayes on November 8th, 2020 at 1:38 PM

I've long been curious if Michigan would be able to find success from the lower ranks - and I'm not talking about the risky practice of plucking a MAC coach.. We've seen that play out over the years with the Purdue's of the world and more recently Minnesota and PJ Fleck.

Instead, I've noticed success rivals have had with their coaches from lower levels of football. Ohio State did well with Jim Tressel after he won at Youngstown State, and ND brought consistency back to its program with Brian Kelly who climbed the ranks quickly after GVSU. Kelly has been up and down at Notre Dame but a level above Weiss and Willingham and has even been to a national title game - not to mention yesterday's win.

Matt Entz was the defensive coordinator for NDSU from 2014-2018 where the Bison won four national titles and lost in the semifinals once (2015). They went 69-6 and 36-4 in that time span, never losing more than one game in conference, or two in a season (which are a few games longer than FBS due to playoffs). 

When head coach Chris Klieman left for Kansas State before the 2019 season, Entz took over as the head coach and the Bison repeated as National Champions going 8-0 in conference and 16-0 overall. They are 1-0 this year after beating Central Arkansas and will play the rest of their games in the Spring.

Pros: Proven success as a defensive coach which requires consistency and discipline. Part of a winning culture that has seen last two coaches go D1.  Is 48 years old and his teams run a "smashmouth spread offense". QB Trey Lance is an NFL prospect.

Cons: Only one year as a head coach at a small school, could have been a Wylie Coyote year, but they did go undefeated. Bohl has been okay at Wyoming, and Kleiman has been good not great at KSU.  However it is worth noting, there was no drop off in performance when Bohl left Kleiman in charge and so far, no drop off when Klieman left Entz in charge. In their current roles, the verdict is still out for both of them. Recruiting could be a question mark. 2021 season is in Spring and would likely only work for a 2022 hire, not 2021 - although this could be another barometer for success. Farm kid who may have culture shock in Ann Arbor.

This type of hire, would be risky for sure, but in my mind is the type of thinking the search committee needs to eventually have. I feel strongly that highly-motivated, successful coaches can make that jump as they can sell recruits on their past success. 

jdib

November 8th, 2020 at 1:50 PM ^

They just need to get a spread guy.  Someone that can run it and understands it's inefficiencies/ways to defend it. I want to beat OSU before I die an untimely death and I never get to see it again.

KC Wolve

November 8th, 2020 at 2:25 PM ^

Eh, KSU grad here. Seems to be an OK fit for KSU and showing some promise, but I don’t think he would be the best fit at UM. Honestly, I’m not sure he would leave. He seems like a guy content at a smaller school and his buddy is the AD. Maybe he would, but I doubt he’d want the extra stuff that goes with a job like Michigan. 

KC Wolve

November 8th, 2020 at 3:07 PM ^

I mean sure, but there is a negative % chance he even takes an interview though. He’s getting whatever open NFL job he wants next year and didn’t take the job at his Alma Mater last year. 
 

Brady may be the same, but he’s got to be the first call in this magical universe where JH isn’t coaching at UM next year. 

NeverPunt

November 8th, 2020 at 2:24 PM ^

Have we thought about just letting the football program slip into oblivion? I know but hear me out. It’s clear Michigan won’t cheat as hard as the other schools. So what do we have to look forward to? Best case scenario a win every couple years vs OSU and getting worked in the playoffs? Maybe we should just hang our hats on the historical aspects of the program, hang up the cleats, and take up a new major sport like curling or synchronized poetry?

Phaedrus

November 8th, 2020 at 7:38 PM ^

That would be like hiring Harbaugh now. He’s a good coach who is past his prime. Lincoln Riley was an upgrade not because of Xs and Os, but because of his youth and motivation.

Old coaches who can provide the type of motivation our players need are crazy (think Bo). Other old coaches who are successful tend to have an established machine (Saban). Harbaugh was pretty effective when he first got here because he was crazy. As he has toned the crazy down the past few years, our players have appeared less motivated.

Bob Stoops would not motivate our players to punch above their weight, which is what we need if we’re ever going to beat OSU in the near future. 

Ghost of North Hall

November 8th, 2020 at 3:43 PM ^

He obviously comes with baggage but I think Steve Sarkisian would be a good hire. Lots of experience on offense and in the HC role. Assuming he has beaten the demons that haunted him at USC, he could be a guy that can change the culture of the program. 

Short of that, I say we pay TB12 $100M to come save the program. 

Phaedrus

November 8th, 2020 at 7:45 PM ^

Sarkisian was given an opportunity similar to the Michigan job and he failed spectacularly even though he recruited much better than Harbaugh has.

Tom Brady would probably make a terrible coach. He knows so much about football it’s insane, but can he effectively communicate it? If he wanted to be our QB coach I would give him a shot because he would be a 5-star QB magnet.

If you’re thinking Brady, Josh McDaniels would be the guy to hire. 

bama north

November 8th, 2020 at 3:48 PM ^

I’m looking for one of, or both of, these two things:

1) Big time offensive mind.  Like a Ryan Day.  Defense isn’t coming back to football anytime soon.

2) One of the best recruiters of modern college football history.  Talent is everything.