You're right, it's BTN's
Obviously, its the only
Obviously, its the only possible explanation.
If this game was on espn, Brown takes the pick to the house, zoltan runs the fake punt for a touchdown, stonum doesn't fumble, and OT never happens
Au revoir, Shoshanna!
I for one, have never seen an
I for one, have never seen an unsettling loss on the ESPN family of networks (including ABC)
successfully achieved 1 year self-imposed posting ban 4/10/13
If the Indiana game was on
If the Indiana game was on BTN, we probably lose, and tate is out for the year instead of being able to finish the game and come back this week
Au revoir, Shoshanna!
bad karma
their broadcasts are just distracting. I'm in the middle of praying to the football gods when they put "2nd and 4" when its really 2nd and 14. How can xenu and yahweh, and buddah change the game for my favor when I'm busy cussing out the stupid announcers??!?
http://ttifi.blogspot.com/ for interesting vids
http://ttifiblog.tumblr.com/ for interesting pics
I think we lost
Because State had more points at the end of the game.
You can't compare the Horror
You can't compare the Horror and Toledo to today.
BTN is generally poor
I was listening to the radio and watching BTN w/ the sound off, and I'm pretty sure the BTN missed a play entirely and missed one of the kickoffs. Those Ro-tel commercials are more important than the F-n game, apparently.
And why in the world was the UM v MSU game even on the BTN and not ABC or at least ESPN? I realize one team wasn't ranked and the other was ranked 20-something, but still...
You're right, it's BTN's fault. Eff them.
@pnbloem | Ultra-MGoBoard