BBall Recruiting - EM 5* Nimari Burnett Update

Submitted by Matt EM on August 9th, 2019 at 11:35 AM
https://mobile.twitter.com/endless_motor/status/1159849907374743553

https://mobile.twitter.com/endless_motor/status/1159849907374743553

Wolverine Devotee

August 9th, 2019 at 11:45 AM ^

Lance Were is also visiting that day. High 4 star. 

I assume they’ll visit for the Michigan-Army West Point game on Saturday. 

outsidethebox

August 9th, 2019 at 4:29 PM ^

I upvoted you because Zeb in a very good player. But here, understand that Nimari is at a different altitude-this kid is a true difference-maker in every way. Zeb will be a solid point-Nimari is the consummate point. Nimari can play the 2 but he would be most dynamic at the point. I've watched the clips of most of the top kids in this class...if you are building a basketball team you start with Nimari-he makes everyone else better. He's likely a one-and-done but here (Michigan) you take that one and build upon it.

True Blue Grit

August 9th, 2019 at 11:55 AM ^

Excellent.  I'd think the duration of that visit is probably a very good thing.  Taking a longer look at the campus, program facilities, living situation, etc. likely indicates strong interest on his part.  

Blue in Paradise

August 9th, 2019 at 12:09 PM ^

it is especially key for Juwan to get a big-time guard.

Juwan has such a tremendous credibility in terms of his work with NBA big-men (not to mention Saadi’s track record) that you have to figure he is going to recruit big men well.

Jasper

August 9th, 2019 at 1:26 PM ^

Question for Matt (optional, of course): Assuming that Michigan (in a Beilein sort of way) won't play dirty like Kansas and other such schools, how much will that matter with this particular recruit?

Matt EM

August 9th, 2019 at 4:06 PM ^

The good folks at UMHoops seem to think Illinois is a threat/contender for Nimari. I’m not a betting man, but if I were, I don’t think Illinois is a factor here.

Matt EM

August 9th, 2019 at 6:08 PM ^

Nope. Oats is an outstanding recruiter that maintains relationships and has frequent contact. I think the Beilein tenure may have influenced some to think that approach was the standard/normal. Each approach has its pros/cons but the approach under Coach Beilein wasn’t necessarily the most frequently used.

Mr Miggle

August 9th, 2019 at 7:08 PM ^

Beilein's approach to recruiting probably didn't lead to his landing all of the best players he might have. On the other hand, he was here for 12 years and I can't remember any off-court problems with any of his recruits. It's hard not to think there was some correlation. It's hard to isolate different parts of his approach and say which helped and which didn't.

Bottom line is that he had a lot of success on the court. There's a strong correlation to his recruiting results.