Al Borges on Cade vs. JJ: “I don’t see any real discernible difference”

Submitted by MMBbones on November 15th, 2022 at 3:39 PM

Yeah, the subject is clickbait, true but out of context. I need some negbang to keep from receiving that OMG pantsless poster of Brian everyone receives when hitting 5k MGoPoints. I am perilously close.

Al Borges and Sam Webb can be found here: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHJn7TSOOno

Most of their conversation has already been held elsewhere, but Sam and Al are still always fun. Here’s some summary:

Tidbits:  Al has published a book: https://www.amazon.com/Al-Borges/e/B0BL8D56W5/ref=zg_bs_2449_bl_sccl_12/000-0000000-0000000

Al about the Nebraska defense:

(4:00ff) “What jumped out at me…was the second half….12 consecutive snaps of cover one… What is the only conclusion you can draw? They were convinced they could cover the Michigan receivers by locking onto them man to man…. They did stop the pass.”

 

On to the M offense:

“Good news: they ran 13 duo plays…at will….wonderful job of gaming the 3-4 defense.”

(8:00ff) “The loss of Luke Schoonmaker made a difference”

(11:00ff)“What Michigan does….in college football the whole idea now is to spread the field…Michigan’s game more is NFL Titan football…provide more gaps to defend…with Michigan you have to defend D gap and sometimes even E gap….unique to college football…”

(13:30ff) Michigan has a unique “ability to consistently get plays started…because of those multiple looks.”   Credits Sherrone Moore.

(17:30ff) Regarding play calling:  “Success is intoxicating…If you’re running the ball down people’s throats, the first thing that comes to your mind is a run play…if you’re gonna pass you almost have to talk yourself into it.”

 

They continue, but that’s some of the more interesting stuff.

Gameboy

November 15th, 2022 at 3:43 PM ^

I wonder what many of those fanboys who were calling for JJ to start over Cade all throughout last year and beginning of this year would be saying if Cade was still healthy...

MMBbones

November 15th, 2022 at 5:04 PM ^

Yes, I quoted Al, but context is key... I'll edit this to give the time when he says it.

I apologize for excessive complexity in the OP. I figured it was a boring week of football so simple posts weren't worth posting. I miscalulated.

Edit:  My quote is from 1:03:30

Also: around 54:00 Al discusses playing Corum and Edwards at the same time. Interesting thought.

BrightonB

November 15th, 2022 at 8:15 PM ^

Ha ... maybe so.  My only dig on JJ currently is (and it baffles me that it has not improved) the amount of deep balls he has missed this year when I always felt before this year that is what he was good at along with his mobility.  Because of our run game I think we most likely would be at the same place we are now (record wise) with either to be honest.  I feel comfortable with either of them at this point but I do hope the long ball improves asap.

ThadMattasagoblin

November 15th, 2022 at 3:53 PM ^

JJ still opens up the offense on the ground. It is maddening that the coaches can't scheme and coach up something better than the 95th best passing offense in the country no matter who is the quarterback. If we had like the 40th best passing offense and the 3rd best rushing offense, we would probably win the national championship. 

Midukman

November 17th, 2022 at 7:13 AM ^

I have no regrets with JJ over Cade. The kids having a little trouble getting his fastball in on the inside corner, aka the deep ball. But when we play OSU, make no mistake we’re gonna see a lot more qb runs then we’ve seen all year. Or OSU is gonna sell out to defend JJ which will open up play action. Either way those are things that Cade just didn’t have in his arsenal. Cade wasn’t winning a national championship, maybe JJ can’t either but it’s not for lack of ability. 

WestQuad

November 15th, 2022 at 3:44 PM ^

I've seen and heard multiple people say that our receivers aren't getting any seperation this year.  Even if JJ is a better thrower, it doesn't matter if no one is open.   Need to scheme some guys open.  Got to have a couple of tricks up our sleave for OSU.   

UM_Ftown

November 15th, 2022 at 3:46 PM ^

Can anyone do a side by side comparison of the numbers? 
 

I feel like the identity of the offense hasn’t changed, it’s a run first pass second type of team. When they do pass it’s to help open up the run, or play action. More RPO this year but not nearly as much as people likely assumed.

So I kinda see what he’s saying. 

Watching From Afar

November 15th, 2022 at 4:22 PM ^

Someone did on Twitter last weekend, though I cannot remember who.

It basically boiled down to the passing offense being slightly below last year and the rushing offense being slightly better.

The rushing offense improvement is, in some part, due to the threat of JJs legs. Even though they still run no read zone reads, they run enough live ones to make defenses respect the threat of JJ running. Also, Corum is probably slightly better than Haskins overall, though not quite the moose he was.

Passing wise, Cade's downfield shots last year were a little squirrly (think of the Sainristil grab against Nebraska) but from just memory, he gave his guys a better shot at making catches than JJ has. While the passing game this year might not be any worse, be honest, who thought it wouldn't be massively improved? And that's the point. It's still ok, but we were all expecting it to be significantly better and since it's not, it's a disappointment.

Rupert Bear

November 16th, 2022 at 8:05 AM ^

This is one of the few rational thoughts in this thread. Like you said, strictly from memory but I don't think I'm imagining it, I remember Cade being pretty money on deep shots last year including those deadly flea-flickers. JJ seems like he's been pretty much 0-fer this year and that seems so inexplicable because that wasn't the case for him last year either. That being said, last year Cade never keeping on read options was a limiting factor in the run game and JJ fixes that. None of this is dragging either guy it just is what it's been and, yea, it's been disappointing to keep seeing those shots go long every time. If they could pair hitting one of those occasionally with their run game they'd be even harder to stop, and not for nothing, more fun to watch.

JonnyHintz

November 15th, 2022 at 8:45 PM ^

Through 10 games: 

 

Cade: 149/237 (62.8%) 1,883 yards. 12 TDs 2 INT. Offense scoring 34.7 PPG

 

JJ: 147/213 (69.0%) 1,744 yards. 14 TDs 2 INT. Offense scoring 41.4 PPG

 

Note: Though the stats are through 10 games, important to acknowledge that JJ only started 9 of them. In starts only, Cade averaged 188.3 YPG and JJ has averaged 190.4 YPG. Also not listed are the 195 rushing yards and 3 TDs for JJ, and the 4 rushing yards and 1 TD for Cade. 

JonnyHintz

November 15th, 2022 at 9:37 PM ^

A lot of that is similarities in how conservative the offenses were. Both offenses relied heavily on the short stuff and receivers getting YAC. So the numbers aren’t really going to jump up despite JJ being a bit more accurate. 
 

JJ has the edge in TDs as well 14-12 despite one less start, in addition to what you’re getting on the ground. Overall, JJ has been an upgrade. Maybe not as significant as hoped but the flashes are there. If he connects on a couple of those deep balls, thats where you’d really see the statline difference. 

ldevon1

November 15th, 2022 at 3:47 PM ^

The reason Al isn't an offensive coordinator anywhere. The threat of the run from JJ is the biggest and most discernable difference. Not to mention the throws Cade can't make, that we watch JJ do every week. 

Carcajou

November 15th, 2022 at 5:43 PM ^

the throws Cade can't make, that we watch JJ do every week

That is actually the problem - the throws that Cade couldn't make (especially deep balls to WRs) JJ can't seem to make either.

And so rather than celebrating the joy of a 10-0 start, we spend a large amount of time worrying what may happen versus better quality teams like Ohio State and other teams Michigan will likely face in the post-season.