Academic PR Fumble at the Goal Line

Submitted by CMHCFB on October 1st, 2019 at 11:19 PM

The Toledo Blade publishes a snarky article about UM’s academic standards and if they put UM at a recruiting disadvantage compared to other schools as Harbaugh has eluded.  

Their FOIA request for the SAT/ACT scores for athletes (rollup, not individual) was denied, essentially because they are not required to provide this info.  Ohio State provided the information and went into further detail about exemptions/leeway given to athletics.   Either there is no higher standard or this was a poorly conceived response.  If UM has Stanford like requirements it could have been a recruiting win.  IMO it comes off as being less  transparent than needed and they squandered an opportunity to boost the university’s profile.  If the test score are higher than the competitors, publicize that....seems simple.   I’d love to know what input the AD had on this decision, every opportunity for a competitive advantage should be publicized.  Instead, the snarky little article eludes there is more to hide that the General Studies major that was previously brought to light.

It was a well publicized story that Justin Fields takes online classes.  When jokes were made a professor made it clear that these courses are no joke.   The way it was handled was a PR win for OSU, why can’t we respond in any other manner than “you can’t make us tell you that”.  

 

https://www.toledoblade.com/sports/michigan/2019/10/01/Briggs-Do-Michigan-s-academic-standards-put-it-at-a-disadvantage/stories/20191001103

CMHCFB

October 1st, 2019 at 11:53 PM ^

I generally think not giving more information than required is a good thing, heck almost always.  However, when being more transparent is a win for the school, you take it every time.   It would not set a precedent, you can still refuse all future requests you are not required to give,  even if you made an exception to this one.    

To me it’s the equivalent of missing a layup, big it did make me curious what the decision making process was.  They requested an extension so I am assuming it was discussed internally, but who had the final say?  An administrator? The AD? I could see the AD pushing to release it but being overruled by an administrator looking at it through a different lens. It it happened, it would  have been a fun exchange to listen to.  Any impact regardless of the response would be negligible at best, but take the opportunity for even the smallest W any time you can get it. 

Indy Pete - Go Blue

October 1st, 2019 at 11:25 PM ^

This is not high on the totem pole of priorities for Michigan football.  Beating Ohio State on the field would do wonders for the reputation of the athletic department. Besides, everybody assumes that Michigan’s standards are higher, so why release information that may not support this as strongly as we would like?  

CMHCFB

October 2nd, 2019 at 12:15 AM ^

Good point, I hadn’t considered the results may be less supportive than the already strong academic perception.  Makes total sense tho if there is less to gain.  I was thinking more along the lines of the legal team not seeing the big picture and not responding to non required data based on policy. 

MGoBlue2k16

October 2nd, 2019 at 12:58 AM ^

Because lets hypothetically say Michigan Football's average ACT were a 26 - an average that would be 2.8 points higher than OSU. 

Articles would be FAR more likely produced talking about how awful it is that Michigan Football team's average ACT is a full 7 points below the average for the university (2019 class has a mid 50 percentile of 32 - 35). 

It would have a much higher chance of being used to portray the University negatively than positively. People love outrage articles about Michigan football and this would just add the the pile of content. 

Mi Sooner

October 1st, 2019 at 11:28 PM ^

So you were the one who read today’s Toledo Blade.  No one in their right mind reads that mess.  It isn’t even large enough to paper a rabbit cage.

yeah, I’m from metro Toledo.

4godkingandwol…

October 1st, 2019 at 11:38 PM ^

Thanks for the article, troll. Your asocial behavior is a text book example of an inferiority complex. Please turn off your computer, get out of your moms basement, and go to your job delivering pizzas. 

CMHCFB

October 2nd, 2019 at 1:21 AM ^

Atticus you may want to google subtle, it doesn’t mean what you think it means.  

Would DTW mean Detroit? insanely hidden and “subtle”.   CFB is the literal acronym for college football.  You cracked the code, Einstein, go grab a participation trophy, but you can’t call it subtle, it’s literally my username lol.  

Read my post history, all of it, not just the last week when I referenced the Speilman post or Cooper record.  I’m not a troll and never ha e been, that’s just a lazy take.  Take any post I have, posts about the recruits from Chicago and how UM had made great inroads building relationships there, posts arguing the receivers are playing well, it’s Shea who isn’t finding them, posts about recruiting news and visitors to UM and show where I’m a troll.  You’re mad I disagree that UM could have got better PR by responding to the FOIA request?  

Given you think a username LITERALLY showing where I am from AND reference college football is like deciphering the Dead Sea Scrolls I’d love to hear an original thought from you on how you’d have handled the request and why.  Or since this is a football blog, let’s hear a single original thought from you on this year’s team, the program in general, how YOU would handle crossing routes.  I’d love to hear insight from the amazing mind who cracked the code. Lol wow.  

Robbie Moore

October 2nd, 2019 at 12:36 AM ^

Antisocial personality? Look here fella...

Vlad Putin is a bare chested man of the people. A statesman on horseback. The world's wealthiest human and has two girlfriends whose combined ages do not equal his. He can speak Russian in five other languages. He always runs with scissors. Never waits 30 minutes to get in the pool after eating.

 

Gucci Mane

October 1st, 2019 at 11:49 PM ^

Hey OP, soon it will be legal for Michigan to pay players, like your buckeyes have for a long time. The talent gap won’t be able to be bought anymore.  

bronxblue

October 1st, 2019 at 11:58 PM ^

UM's FOIA office (and they approach toward compliance) is notorious for being awful.  Brain chronicled how ridiculous it was some time ago during the great David Brandon Email Debacle.  It's shitty how they responded but, I'll be honest, the Blade shouldn't have been surprised.

Harball sized HAIL

October 2nd, 2019 at 12:13 AM ^

If you have ears, that are capable of capturing sound, and those sounds are words of other humans, and your brain is able to process those words into thought, you might understand the difference between Michigan athletes and Theee OS joke of a U paid temps.  

rob f

October 2nd, 2019 at 12:26 AM ^

I don't recall Harbaugh alluding to Michigan's academic standards putting U of M at a recruiting disadvantage.  Because of this misrepresentation (intentional or not) on your part, OP, you get my negvote.

I do recall Harbaugh (while Stanford's HC) expressing concerns about Michigan funneling football student-athletes toward general studies. The column the OP linked makes mention of it.

Gordon Gee was one of those quoted by the columnist. Gordon Gee as judge of Michigan's academics?  Geez.  A whole lot of shit happened on his watch at OSU, as I recall.  Not at all credible, IMO.

footballguy

October 2nd, 2019 at 12:40 AM ^

Digging up all of the academic information, averaging it out, then giving that to a couple OSU fans is probably something Michigan does not want to do. And it doesn't matter if the info is good, either. Do those douches even publish the article if it doesn't confirm their hypothesis?

There's really no point or way for Michigan to win this situation, so them declining is incredibly fair.

Serth

October 2nd, 2019 at 1:30 AM ^

A non story. Gene Smith's horseshit, tone-deaf take on California's latest bill passed "an uneven playing field" is the story that everyone is eating up.